Whose rights to the city? Parklets, parking, and university engagement in urban placemaking

References

• Addie, J. P. D. 2017. “From the Urban University to Universities in Urban Society.” Regional Studies 51 (7): 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1224334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addie, J.-P. D. 2020. “Anchoring (in) the Region: The Dynamics of University-Engaged Urban Development in Newark, NJ, USA.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 102 (2): 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2020.1729663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althorpe, C., and M. Horak. 2023. “The end of the Right to the City: A Radical-Cooperative View.” Urban Affairs Review 59 (1): 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arancibia, D., S. Farber, B. Savan, Y. Verlinden, N. Smith Lea, J. Allen, and L. Vernich. 2019. “Measuring the Local Economic Impacts of Replacing on-Street Parking with Bike Lanes.” Journal of the American Planning Association 85 (4): 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1638816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arango-Kure, M., M. Garz, and A. Rott. 2014. “Bad News Sells: The Demand for News Magazines and the Tone of Their Covers.” Journal of Media Economics 27 (4): 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2014.963230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustine, J. 2021a. “‘You Get Rid of a Car, you Get Rid of a Customer’: Parklet Plan Causes Parking Panic.” The Mercury, 17 November, accessed November 17, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine, J. 2021b. “‘Taking Over’: Traders Voice Fears as UTAS Moves to CBD.” The Mercury, published 18 November, accessed May 17 2022, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine, J. 2021c. “Opposition Growing to Proposed UTAS Parklet as Petition Exceeds 500 Signatures.” The Mercury, published 23 November, accessed May 17 2022, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine, J. 2021d. “UTAS Hits Pause on its Push for a Parklet.” The Mercury, published 26 November, accessed June 2 2022, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine, J. 2021e. “Parklet Designer Defends Fewer Cars.” The Mercury, published 2 December, accessed December 3, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. 2020. “From ‘Streets for Traffic’ to ‘Streets for People’: Can Street Experiments Transform Urban Mobility?” Transport Reviews 40 (6): 734–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragaglia, F., and C. Rossignolo. 2021. “Temporary Urbanism as a New Policy Strategy: A Contemporary Panacea or a Trojan Horse?” International Planning Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1882963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carl, J., and M. Menter. 2021. “The Social Impact of Universities: Assessing the Effects of the Three University Missions on Social Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (5): 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Change.org. 2014. “Save Melville Street, Hobart from UTAS Takeover.” 21 November. https://www.change.org/p/hobart-city-council-save-melville-street-hobart-from-utas-takeover.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. 2010. “The Student City: An Ongoing Story of Neoliberalism, Gentrification, and Commodification.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (3): 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. S. 2020. “Collective Versus Self-Interests: What is Behind NIMBY?” Land and Housing Controversies in Hong Kong, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5266-3_8.
   Google Scholar
• City of Hobart. 2018a. “Public Spaces (By-Law No.4 of 2018)”. https://www.hobartcity.com.au/Council/Legislation-and-by-laws.
   Google Scholar
• City of Hobart. 2018b. “Parking (By-Law No.5 of 2018)”. https://www.hobartcity.com.au/Council/Legislation-and-by-laws.
   Google Scholar
• City of Hobart. 2019. “Elizabeth Street Retail Precinct Streetscape Upgrade Project.” https://www.hobartcity.com.au/Projects/Current-projects/Elizabeth-Street-Midtown-retail-precinct-upgrade.
   Google Scholar
• City of Hobart. 2021. “Elizabeth Street (Midtown) Streetscape Project.” https://yoursay.hobartcity.com.au/midtown.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, K. J., K. M. Currans, C. D. Muhs, C. Ritter, S. Morrissey, and C. Roughton. 2012. Consumer Behavior and Travel Choices: A Focus on Cyclists and Pedestrians. New York: National Association of City Transportation Officials. https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/consumer_behavior_and_travel_choices_clifton.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, K. J., C. D. Muhs, S. Morrissey, T. Morrissey, K. M. Currans, and C. Ritter. 2013. Examining Consumer Behavior and Travel Choices (OTREC-RR-12-15). Portland: Transportation Research and Education Center.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, G. 2009. “Carlton and the Campus: The University and the Gentrification of Inner Melbourne 1958–75.” Urban Policy and Research 27 (3): 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140903118365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear, M. 1992. “Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (3): 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of State Growth. 2022. Tasmanian Road Rules. https://www.transport.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/358278/413398_-_Tasmanian_Road_Rules_2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DeVerteuil, G. 2013. “Where has NIMBY Gone in Urban Social Geography?” Social & Cultural Geography 14 (6): 599–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2013.800224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Masso, A. 2012. “Grounding Citizenship: Toward a Political Psychology of Public Space.” Political Psychology 33 (1): 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00866.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djerf-Pierre, M., and A. Shehata. 2017. “Still an Agenda Setter: Traditional News Media and Public Opinion During the Transition from low to High Choice Media Environments.” Journal of Communication 67 (5): 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. 2021. “Save Melville Street from UTAS takeover.” 17 November. https://www.louiseelliot.org/post/savemelville.
   Google Scholar
• Eranti, V. 2017. “Re-visiting NIMBY: From Conflicting Interests to Conflicting Valuations.” The Sociological Review 65 (2): 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026116675554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P. 2014. “NIMBYism – A Re-Examination of the Phenomenon.” Social Science Research 48: 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faroldi, E., and M. Vettori. 2020. “University is City. The Infrastructure of Education and Research as an Engine of Urban Regeneration.” EAAE-ARCC International Conference 2nd Valencia International Biennial of research in architecture, 1. The Architect and the City, València, 1–14 November. https://re.public.polimi.it/handle/11311/1162455.
   Google Scholar
• Ferman, B., M. Greenberg, T. Le, and S. C. McKay. 2021. “The Right to the City and to the University: Forging Solidary Beyond the Town/Gown Divide.” The Assembly: A Journal for Public Scholarship on Education 3: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.33011/assembly.v3i1.1003.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Esquinas, M., and H. Pinto. 2014. “The Role of Universities in Urban Regeneration: Reframing the Analytical Approach.” European Planning Studies 22 (7): 1462–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.791967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., and K. Shaw. 2007. “Recognising Tertiary Students in Place-Making for Urban Spaces.” 3rd State of Australian Cities National Conference, 28–30 November, Adelaide, Australia. https://apo.org.au/node/60282.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., and K. Shaw. 2009. “The Unintended Segregation of Transnational Students in Central Melbourne.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (8): 1884–1902. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, D., and J. Warren. 2022. “The NIMBY Problem.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 34 (1): 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/09516298211044852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, C. F. S. 2019. “Insurgent Planning? Insights from Two Decades of the Right to the City in Fortaleza, Brazil.” City 23 (3): 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2019.1648030.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, T. A. 2005. “NIMBY and the Civic Good.” City & Community 4 (4): 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2005.00144.x.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., F. Martin, and T. Dwyer. 2018. “Locative News: Mobile Media, Place Informatics, and Digital News.” In The Places and Spaces of News Audiences, edited by C. Peters, 53–71. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, K., P. Hess, J. Brody, and A. James. 2022. “North American Street Design for the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Typology of Emerging Interventions.” Journal of Urbanism, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2071970.
   Google Scholar
• Grigolo, M. 2019. “Understanding the Right to the City as the Right to Difference.” In Advancing Urban Rights: Equality and Diversity in the City, edited by E. Garcia-Chueca, and L. Vidal, 23–31. Barcelona: CIDOB.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 2006. “Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” In Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, edited by M. van den Brink, and T. Metze, 65–74. Netherlands Geographical Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., H. Rainie, W. Lu, M. Dwyer, I. Shin, and K. Purcell. 2014. “Social Media and the ‘Spiral of Silence’.” Pew Research Center, Washington DC, accessed August 10 2022, available at https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/.
   Google Scholar
• Holleran, M. 2021. “Millennial ‘YIMBYs’ and Boomer ‘NIMBYs’: Generational Views on Housing Affordability in the United States.” The Sociological Review 69 (4): 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120916121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, M., and C. M. Mouat. 2021. “The Rise (and Rise) of Vertical Studentification: Exploring the Drivers of Studentification in Australia.” Urban Studies 58 (9): 1866–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020925246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, E. 2016. “Welcome to Mid-Town as Business Booms on Hobart’s Northern City Fringe.” The Mercury, published 30 May, accessed June 9 2022, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P. 2008. “Regulating the Social Impacts of Studentification: A Loughborough Case Study.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (2): 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1068/a396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iveson, K. 2013. “Cities Within the City: Do-it-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (3): 941–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarman, N., and E. Stratford. 2023a. “Against the Grain: Public Interests, the Parklet, and the University.” Australian Planner 59 (1): 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2023.2188234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarman, N., and E. Stratford. 2023b. “Proxy Wars, the Parklet, and the University: Challenges for Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design, https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2023.2255148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimpton, A., D. Pojani, C. Ryan, L. Ouyang, N. Sipe, and J. Corcoran. 2021. “Contemporary Parking Policy, Practice, and Outcomes in Three Large Australian Cities.” Progress in Planning 153: 100506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2020.100506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinton, C., D. P. Smith, J. Harrison, and A. Culora. 2018. “New Frontiers of Studentification: The Commodification of Student Housing as a Driver of Urban Change.” The Geographical Journal 184 (3): 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. W. 2021. “Public-Public Partnerships: Expanding Higher Education Capacity Through Economic Redevelopment.” In Re-envisioning Higher Education’s Public Mission, edited by A. Papadimitriou, and M. Boboc, 35–57. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koekkoek, A., M. Van Ham, and R. Kleinhans. 2021. “Unravelling University-Community Engagement: A Literature Review.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 25 (1): 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1996. Writings on Cities, edited by E. Kofman, and E. Lebas. Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. A., and M. B. Salwen. 1997. “Predicting the Spiral of Silence on a Controversial Public Issue.” Howard Journal of Communications 8 (1): 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646179709361747.
   Google Scholar
• Lydon, M., and A. Garcia. 2015. Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action for Long-Term Change. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 2009. “From Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City.” City 13 (2-3): 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, N., and H. Rahmat. 2019. “Web 2.0 Social Media: Supporting People–Place Relationships.” In The Routledge Handbook of People and Place in the 21st-Century City, edited by K. Bishop, and N. Marshall, 229–239. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mautner, G. 2008. “Analyzing Newspapers, Magazines and Other Print Media.” Semantic Scholar https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:157672433.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, A. 2019. “Popular Hobart Barber Shop Fostering Community Spirit Moves to New Location.” The Mercury, published 2nd December, accessed June 9 2022, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M., and S. Valenzuela. 2020. Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and Public Opinion. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, M. 2019. “From Activism to Collaborative City Making: PARK(ing) Day as a Case Study in Tactical Urbanism.” (Masters of Planning thesis). School of Technology, Environment and Design, University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D., M. Mossman, D. Rogers, and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 2022. “The University and the City: Spaces of Risk, Decolonisation, and Civic Disruption.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54 (1): 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211053019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Mercury. 2023. https://www.themercury.com.au/help/about.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A. M., and T. Ukai. 2022. “University Campuses as Agents for Urban Change.” Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies 10 (1): 22–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2022-0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, C. B. 2021. “O’Donnell and Tuomey’s University Architecture: Informal Learning Spaces That Enhance User Engagement.” Architecture and Culture 9 (1): 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1794711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahar Lata, L. 2021. “To Whom Does the City Belong? Obstacles to Right to the City for the Urban Poor in Bangladesh.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 51 (4): 638–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2020.1791934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Transport Commission. no date. Australian Road Rules. https://www.ntc.gov.au/laws-and-regulations/australian-road-rules.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. 1974. “The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion.” Journal of Communication 24 (2): 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. 1997. “The News Media: An Effective Political Actor?” Political Communication 14 (4): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. 1998. “Time and News: The Media’s Limitations as an Instrument of Democracy.” International Political Science Review 19 (1): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251298019001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, J. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluative Methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. D. 1997. “Seeing Bifocally: Media, Place, Culture.” In Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology, edited by A. Gupta, and J. Ferguson, 75–92. Duke University Press. https://iro.uiowa.edu/esploro/outputs/bookChapter/Seeing-Bifocally-Media-Place-Culture/998355732540
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, J. A. 2018. “Bicycle Lanes and Business Success: A San Francisco Examination.” Transportation Research Record 2672 (7): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0361198118792321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pojani, D., and N. Sipe. 2021. “Emerging Narratives of Parking Supply and Demand in Contemporary Cities.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 14: 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1762112.
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, T., and M. Montilla. 2022. “Learning to Share: Outdoor Commercial Spaces on San Francisco’s Valencia Street.” Berkeley Planning Journal 32 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5070/BP332054155.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2002. “Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the City and its Urban Politics of the Inhabitant.” GeoJournal 58 (2–3): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2014. “Possible Worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the Right to the City.” Journal of Urban Affairs 36 (1): 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramayana, B., and S. Batel. 2022. “The ‘Urban Village’ Versus the ‘City for Profit’.” OBETS 17 (1): 47–62. https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2022.17.1.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REALMstudios. 2021. Melville Street Temporary Parklet Development Application. Prepared for The City of Hobart.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, J., M. Häring, W. Loosen, W. Maalej, and L. Merten. 2021. “Content Analyses of User Comments in Journalism: A Systematic Literature Review Spanning Communication Studies and Computer Science.” Digital Journalism, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1882868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, H. 2013. “Smarter Ways to Change: Learning from Innovative Practice in Road Space Reallocation.” 6th State of Australian Cities Conference, 26–29 November, Sydney, accessed August 10 2022, available at: https://soacconference.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Rowe-Movement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman, R. 2020. Pop-up Civics in 21st Century America: Understanding the Political Potential of Placemaking. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 1997. “From Main Street to Fortress: The Future of Malls as Public Spaces, or ‘Shut up and Shop’.” Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy 9 (Mar): 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Saniga, A., and R. Freestone. 2017. “The Rise of the Australian University City Campus: RMIT and Transformative Design in Melbourne’s CBD.” 8th State of Australian Cities National Conference, 28–30 November, Adelaide, accessed June 29 2022, available at: https://apo.org.au/node/178326.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, K. 2022. “Pro Parklet Mid-Town Businesses Hit back at UTAS Opposition” The Mercury, published 1 January, accessed August 9 2022, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, K., and J. Augustine. 2021. “Hobart City Council Considers Selling Carpark Spaces to Hospital.” The Mercury, published 11 December, accessed June 2 2022, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., and M. Marquez. 2000. “The Other Side of the NIMBY Syndrome.” Society & Natural Resources 13 (3): 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200279108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A., and L. Sagaris. 2010. “From Participation to the Right to the City: Democratic Place Management at the Neighbourhood Scale in Comparative Perspective.” Planning Practice & Research 25 (3): 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2010.503424.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., L. Vanik, and L. K. Bates. 2022. “Disability Justice and Urban Planning.” Planning Theory and Practice 23 (1): 101–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2035545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, Q., F. Awepuga, and K. Dovey. 2021. “Temporary and Tactical Urbanism in Australia: Perspectives from Practice.” Urban Policy and Research 39 (3): 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2021.1963225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, Q., D. Leorke, T. Innocent, and C. Tolentino. 2022. The Playful Parklet: A Research Report for the City of Stonnington. City of Stonnington. https://apo.org.au/node/318295.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Q., D. Leorke, H. M. H. Thai, T. Innocent, and C. Tolentino. 2023. “Playful, Portable, Pliable Interventions Into Street Spaces: Deploying a ‘Playful Parklet’ Across Melbourne’s Suburbs.” Journal of Urban Design, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2023.2227099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford, E., and J. Byrne. 2023. “Im/Mobilising Bus Travel as an Infrastructure of Care: Student Experiences in a Mid-Size City.” Mobilities, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2244683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford, E., and N. Jarman. 2021. “Parklets Play Valuable Role.” Talking Point, The Mercury, 23 December, pp. 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Tasmanian Parliament. 2022–2023. Legislative Council Select Committee Inquiry into the Provisions of the University of Tasmania Act 1992. https://bit.ly/3ntsneW.
   Google Scholar
• Tasmanian Vehicle and Traffic Act. 1999. https://www.legislation.tas.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1999-070#HP7AEN.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. 2014. “‘Fight the Towers! or Kiss Your Car Park Goodbye’: How Often do Residents Assert Car Parking Rights in Melbourne Planning Appeals?” Planning Theory & Practice 15 (3): 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.929727.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. 2020. “Parking Policy: The Politics and Uneven Use of Residential Parking Space in Melbourne.” Land Use Policy 91: 103706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teresa, B. F. 2022. “Planners’ Alchemy Achieved? How NIMBY and YIMBY Reproduce the Housing Question.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 46 (2): 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A. 2020. Owning the Street: The Everyday Life of Property. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, P. M. 2023. “Agent Models of Customer Journeys on Retail High Streets.” Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 18 (1): 87–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-022-00350-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussler, M., and S. Soroka. 2014. “Consumer Demand for Cynical and Negative News Frames.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 19 (3): 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1940161214524832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Tasmania. 2019. Strategic Plan 2019–2024. https://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/1255234/UTAS-Strategy-Document-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• University of Tasmania. 2019–2024. Strategy. https://www.utas.edu.au/about/governance-leadership-and-strategy/strategy.
   Google Scholar
• University of Tasmania. 2021a. “Bringing Life to Melville Street with Parklet Trial.” Published 9 September 2021, accessed May 17 2022, available at: https://www.media.utas.edu.au/general-news/all-news/bringing-life-to-melville-st-with-parklet-trial.
   Google Scholar
• University of Tasmania. 2021b. “Southern Campus Transformation Preliminary Urban Design Framework.” Accessed July 14 2022, available at: https://online.flippingbook.com/view/401588173/.
   Google Scholar
• University of Tasmania. 2022. “Transforming Our Southern Campus.” https://www.utas.edu.au/about/campuses/southern-transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Synergies Group. 2016. Shaping Healthy Communities. Perspective Statement. Right to the City. https://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/file_58322.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vallis, A. 2019. “Tas Weekend: Hip Hobart Eatery Grinners Adds Cool Factor to Funky Hobart Mid-Town strip.” The Mercury, published 22 November, accessed June 9 2022, available by subscription only.
   Google Scholar
• VanHoose, K., A. R. de Gante, L. Bertolini, J. Kinigadner, and B. Büttner. 2022. “From Temporary Arrangements to Permanent Change: Assessing the Transitional Capacity of City Street Experiments.” Journal of Urban Mobility 2 (Dec): 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100015.
   Google Scholar
• Volker, J. M. B., and S. Handy. 2021. “Economic Impacts on Local Businesses of Investments in Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure: A Review of the Evidence.” Transport Reviews 41 (4): 401–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1912849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., H. Li, J. Zuo, and Z. Wang. 2019. “Evolution of Online Public Opinions on Social Impact Induced by NIMBY Facility.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 78: 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., L. Zheng, and J. Zuo. 2021. “Online Rumor Propagation of Social Media on NIMBY Conflict: Temporal Patterns, Frameworks and Rumor-Mongers.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 91: 106647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlund, O. 2015. “News Consumption in an Age of Mobile Media: Patterns, People, Place, and Participation.” Mobile Media & Communication 3 (2): 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914563369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. 2014. “Cities in the City: Street Art, Enchantment, and the Urban Commons.” Law & Literature 26 (2): 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2014.888208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Y. Zhu, and L. Xu. 2022. “Information Dissemination and Control of NIMBY Projects Under Stigmatization.” Complexity 2022: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4383202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., Y. Ge, and J. Zhang. 2022. “Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Public Participation in the Decision-Making of NIMBY Facilities.” Plos One 17 (2): e0263842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar