Ploidy and DNA content of cape gooseberry populations grown in southern Brazil

References

• Bennett MD, Bhandol P, Leitch IJ. 2000. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms and their modern uses—807 new estimates. Ann Bot. 86:859–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betancourt EPS Level of ploidy of uchuva plants from anther culture. Thesis. Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Birchler JA. 2013. Genetic rules of heterosis in plants. John Wiley Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781118552872.ch19
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho CR, Saraiva LS. 1993. An air drying technique for maize chromosomes without enzymatic maceration. Biothecnic Histochem. 68:142–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallini A, Natali L. 1990. Nuclear DNA variability within Pisum sativum (Leguminosae): cytophotometric analyses. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 173:179–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criollo H, Lagos TC, Fischer G, Mora L, Zamudio L. 2014. Comportamiento de tres genotipos de uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) bajo diferentes sistemas de poda. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Hortícolas. 8:34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dhooghe E, Van Laere K, Eeckhaut T, Leus L, Van Huylenbroeck J. 2011. Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 104:359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer G, Almanza-Merchán PJ, Miranda D. 2014. Importance and cultivation of the uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.). Revista Brasileira De Fruticultura. 36:00– 015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemes-Juhasz A, Balogh P, Ferenczy A, Kristof Z. 2002. Effect of optimal stage of female gametophyte and heat treatment on in vitro gynogenesis induction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Cell Rep. 21:105–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera AM, Fischer G, Chácon MI. 2012. Agronomical evaluation of cape gosseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) from central and north-eastern Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana. 30:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1997. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Implications Genetic Basis Inbreeding Depression Evolution. 51:737–746.
   Google Scholar
• Lagos T, Vallejo F, Criollo H. 2007. Analysis of the combinatorial aptitude of some characteristics of the fruit of Physalis peruviana L. Agronomía Colombiana. 25:36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lagos TC, Vallejo FA, Caetano CM, Muñoz JE, Criollo EH. 2005. Comportamiento meiótico de algunos genotipos de Physalis peruviana L. Fitotecnia Colombiana. 5:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lagos TC, Vallejo FA, Criollo H, Muñoz JE. 2008. Biología reproductiva de la uchuva. Acta Agronómica. 57:81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Leiva-Brondo M, Prohens J, Nuez F. 2001. Genetic analysis indicate superiority of performance of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) hybrids. Journal of New Seeds. 3:71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Liberato SA, Sánchez-Betancourt E, Argüelles JH, González C, Núñez VM, Barrero LS. 2014. Citogenética de genotipos de uchuva, Physalis peruviana L., y Physalis floridana Rydb., con respuesta diferencial a Fusarium oxysporum. Corpoica. Ciencia Y Tecnología Agropecuaria. 15:51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Mapa – Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Serviço Nacional de Proteção de Cultivares – SNPC. 2014. Available in: http://extranet.agricultura.gov.br/php/snpc/cultivarweb/cultivares_protegidas.php. Accessed Jan 15, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Martel E, De Nay D, Siljak-Yakoviev S, Brown S, Sarr A. 1997. Genome size variation and basic chromosome number in pearl millet and fourteen related Pennisetum species. J Hered. 88:139–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel MY 1951. The cytotaxonomy and genetics of Physalis. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 95, 132–183.
   Google Scholar
• Ochatt SJ. 2008. Flow cytometry in plant breeding. Cytometry Part A. 73:581–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkan H, Tuna M, Kilian B, Mori N, Ohta S. 2010. Genome size variation in diploid and tetraploid wild wheats. AoB Plants. 2010:plq015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochatt SJ, Patat-Ochatt EM, Moessner A. 2011. Ploidy level determination within the context of in vitro breeding. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 104, 329–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.007/s11240-011-9918-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivares-Tenorio ML, Dekker M, Verkerk R, Van Boekel MA. 2016. Health-promoting compounds in cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.): review from a supply chain perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol. 57:83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiros CF. 1984. Overview of the genetics and breeding of husk tomato. HortScience (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez N, Bueno M. 2006. Study of the cytogenetic diversity of Physalis peruviana L. (Solanaceae). Acta Biológica Colombiana. 11:75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Santana G, Angarita A 1999. Adventitious regeneration of uchuva somaclones. Available in: <http://www.agronomia.unal.edu.co/biblioteca/public/revista/artic/Fuchuv.htm>. Accessed Mar 21, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schifino-Wittmann M. 2012. Polyploidy and its impact on the origin and evolution of wild and cultivated plants. Curr Agric Sci Technol. 10:2.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds NW. 1980. Polyploidy in plant breeding. Span. 23:73–75.
   Google Scholar
• Soltis DE, Visger CJ, Marchant DB, Soltis PS. 2016. Polyploidy: pitfalls and paths to a paradigm. American Journal of Botany. 7:1146–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevisani N, Schmit R, De Melo RC, Meirelles Coimbra JL, Guidolin AF. 2016. Growth variation in reproductive structures of physalis populations. Interciencia. 41:470–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trillos González O, Cotes Torres JM, Medina Cano CI, Lobo Arias M, Navas Arboleda AA. 2008. Morphologic characterization of forty six accessions of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.), in Antioquia (Colombia). Revista Brasileira De Fruticultura. 30:708–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilmorin R, Simonet M. 1928. Recherches sur le nombre des chromosomes chez les solanées. Internatl. Kong. Vererbungswiss, Verhandl. 2:1520–1536.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn JD, Birchler JA. 2014. Polyploids as a “model system” for the study of heterosis. Plant Reprod. 27:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto K, Sakai KI. 1932. On the chromosome number in some Solanaceae. Jpn J Genet. 8:27–33.
   Google Scholar