599
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports

Examining the Situative Progression of Teachers’ Novice-To-Expert Development in Education Policy

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 151-169 | Received 19 Oct 2022, Accepted 21 Jan 2023, Published online: 26 Jul 2023

References

  • Anyan, F. (2013). The influence of power shifts in data collection and analysis stages: A focus on qualitative research interview. Qualitative Report, 18(18), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1525
  • Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029004011
  • Aydarova, E., Rigney, J., & Dana, N. F. (2022). Playing chess when you only have a couple of pawns: Policy advocacy in teacher education. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 124(9), 199–227. 227. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221134762
  • Baker-Doyle, K. J. (2017). How can community organizations support urban transformative teacher leadership? Lessons from three successful alliances. The Educational Forum, 81(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2017.1350242
  • Billingsley, B. S. (2007). Recognizing and supporting the critical roles of teachers in special education leadership. Exceptionality, 15(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830701503503
  • Bradley-Levine, J. (2018). Advocacy as a practice of critical teacher leadership. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 9(1), 47–62.
  • Bond, N. (2019). Effective legislative advocacy: Policy experts’ advice for educators. The Educational Forum, 83(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1505992
  • Bundy, B., Dahl, J., Guiñals-Kupperman, S., Martino, K., Hengesbach, J., Metzler, J., Smith, T., Spencer, N., Whitehurst, A., Vargas, M., & Vieyra, R. (2019). Aspiring to lead: Physics teacher leaders influencing science education policy. The Physics Teacher, 57(3), 186–189. 189. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5092483
  • Crowther, F., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2009). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Corwin Press.
  • Dagen, A. S., Morewood, A., & Smith, M. L. (2017). Teacher leader model standards and the functions assumed by national board-certified teachers. The Educational Forum, 81(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2017.1314572
  • Derrington, M. L., & Anderson, L. S. (2020). Expanding the role of teacher leaders: Professional learning for policy advocacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(68), 68. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4850
  • Durning, S. J., & Artino, A. R. (2011). Situativity theory: A perspective on how participants and the environment can interact: AMEE Guide no. 52. Medical Teacher, 33(3), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.550965
  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
  • Gessler, M. (2009). Situated learning and cognitive apprenticeship. In R. Maclean & D. Wilson (Eds.), International handbook of education for the changing world of work (pp. 1611–1625). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1X.3
  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2016). The practice of qualitative research: Engaging students in the research process (3rd ed.). Sage Publishing.
  • Hill, H. C. (2009). Fixing teacher professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000705
  • Hite, R., & Milbourne, J. (2018). A proposed conceptual framework for K–12 STEM Master Teacher (STEMMaTe) development. Education Sciences, 8(4), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040218
  • Hite, R., & Milbourne, J. (2022). Divining the professional development experiences of K–12 STEM master teacher leaders in the United States. Professional Development in Education, 48(3), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1955733
  • Hite, R., Vieyra, R., Milbourne, J., Dou, R., Spuck, T., & Smith, J. F. (2020). Chapter 37: STEM Teacher Leadership in Policy. In C. Johnson, M. Mohr-Schroeder, T. Moore & L. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 470–480). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  • Honig, M. I. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation: Challenges and opportunities for the field. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 1–23). State University of New York Press.
  • Horsford, S. D., Scott, J. T., & Anderson, G. L. (2019). The politics of education policy in an era of inequality: Possibilities for democratic schooling. Routledge.
  • Inman, M. (2009). Learning to lead: Development for middle‐level leaders in higher education in England and Wales. Professional Development in Education, 35(3), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580802532654
  • Jin, X., Li, T., Meirink, J., van der Want, A., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Learning from novice–expert interaction in teachers’ continuing professional development. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 745–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1651752
  • Jin, X., Tigelaar, D., van der Want, A., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Novice teachers’ appraisal of expert feedback in a teacher professional development programme in Chinese vocational education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103652
  • Kenjarski, M. (2015). Defining teacher leadership: Elementary teachers’ perceptions of teacher leadership and the conditions which influence its development. [Doctoral dissertation]. North Carolina State University. http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/10097/1/etd.pdf
  • Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Al Hashmi, W., Kim, L. E., Longden, K., Metsäpelto, R. L., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Györi, J. G. (2018). National context and teacher characteristics: Exploring the critical non-cognitive attributes of novice teachers in four countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.001
  • Koskela, R., & Ganser, T. (1998). The cooperating teacher role and career development. Education, 119(1), 106–107.
  • Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership redefined: An evocative context for teacher leadership. School Leadership & Management, 23(4), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000150953
  • Lamont, M., & Swidler, A. (2014). Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing. Qualitative Sociology, 37(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103652
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2000). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In R. L. Cross & S. B. Israelit (Eds.), Strategic learning in a knowledge economy (pp. 167–182). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50010-1
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publishing.
  • Liu, P. (2022). Understanding the roles of expert teacher workshops in building teachers’ capacity in Shanghai turnaround primary schools: A teacher’s perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103574
  • Lynch, M. (2020, August 17). Teachers must be partners in shaping education policies. The Edvocate. https://www.theedadvocate.org/teachers-must-be-partners-in-shaping-education-policies/
  • Mangin, M. M., & Stoelinga, S. R. (2009). The future of instructional teacher leader roles. The Educational Forum, 74(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720903389208
  • Miller, L. (2015). School–university partnerships and teacher leadership: Doing it right. The Educational Forum, 79(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720903389208
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Changing expectations for the K-12 teacher workforce: Policies, preservice education, professional development, and the workplace. National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2014). Exploring opportunities for STEM teacher leadership: Summary of a convocation. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18984
  • Kirsten, N. (2020). A systematic research review of teachers’ professional development as a policy instrument. Educational Research Review, 31, 100366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100366
  • Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., & Horn, I. S. (2012). Methods for taking a situative approach to studying the development of motivation, identity, and learning in multiple social contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(2), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0086-1
  • Pennington, K. (2013). New organizations, new voices: The landscape of today’s teachers shaping policy Center for American Progress. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED561062).
  • Poekert, P. E. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.657824
  • Poekert, P., Alexandrou, A., & Shannon, D. (2016). How teachers become leaders: An internationally validated theoretical model of teacher leadership development. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(4), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2016.1226559
  • Rasberry, M. A., & Mahajan, G. (2008). From isolation to collaboration: Promoting teacher leadership through PLCs. Center for Teaching Quality.
  • Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357
  • Smit, B. (2005). Teachers, local knowledge, and policy implementation: A qualitative policy-practice inquiry. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124505275426
  • Smylie, M. A. (1995). New perspectives on teacher leadership. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 3–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1001662 https://doi.org/10.1086/461811
  • Smylie, M. A., & Eckert, J. (2018). Beyond superheroes and advocacy: The pathway of teacher leadership development. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217694893
  • Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26. 28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45381095
  • Tabacbnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1984). The impact of the student teaching experience on the development of teacher perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718403500608
  • Texas Education Policy Fellowship Program. (2022). Home. Texasepfp.org
  • Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
  • Velasco, R., & Hite, R. (2022). Advocacy interrupted: Exploring K-12 STEM teacher leaders’ conceptions of STEM education advocacy before and during COVID-19. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 26(1), 56–83.
  • Velasco, R. C. L., Hite, R., & Milbourne, J. (2022). Exploring advocacy self-efficacy among K-12 STEM teacher leaders. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10176-z
  • Velasco, R. C. L., Hite, R. L., Milbourne, J. D., & Gottlieb, J. J. (2023). Stand out and speak up: Exploring empowerment perspectives among advocacy activities of STEM teachers in the US. Teacher Development., 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2207095
  • Vienni-Baptista, B., Goñi Mazzitelli, M., García Bravo, M. H., Rivas Fauré, I., Marín-Vanegas, D. F., & Hidalgo, C. (2022). Situated expertise in integration and implementation processes in Latin America. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01203-7
  • Vieyra, R. E., & Hite, R. (2023). Conceptualizing secondary science teachers as strategic leaders. Teaching Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2023.2189234
  • Vieyra, R., Smith, J. F., & Hite, R. (2021, August) Bold actors in policy spaces: Supporting teachers as change agents through a fellowship for science educators. The Learning Professional, 42(4), 60–64.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
  • Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
  • Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200407
  • Yow, J. A., Criswell, B. A., Lotter, C., Smith, W. M., Rushton, G. T., Adams, P., Ahrens, S., Hutchinson, A., & Irdam, G. (2021). Program attributes for developing and supporting STEM teacher leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2006794
  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255