Why co-present groups? Affective processing to produce meaningfulness

References

• Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. (2000). What can we learn from a theory of complexity? Emergence, 2(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327000EM0201_03
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. (2002). Why we cannot know complex things completely. Emergence, 4(1/2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327000EM041&2-07
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. (2006). The importance of a certain slowness. Emergence: complexity and Organizations, 8(3), 106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949/1989). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works 1949–1952 (Vol. 16, pp. 100–103). Southern Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional ‘trans-action’: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8(4), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0804_02
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J., & Watson, B. (2005). Food from thought. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 19(4), 242–256.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (2020). How we understand ‘complexity’ makes a difference: Lessons from critical systems thinking and the covid-19 pandemic in the UK. Systems, 8, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8040052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, M. (2017). Perspectives on complexity, its definition and applications the field. Complicity, 14(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct27611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, J. (2012). The complex systems of practice. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change (pp. 119–131). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, J. (2013). Complexity and relations. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(12), 1264–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.763595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, J., Prager, S., Nash, L., & Karageorge, A. (2020). Psychiatry peer review groups in Australia: A mixed methods exploration of structure and function. BMJ Open, 10(11), e040039. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowles, C. (2014). Complex, but not quite complex enough: The turn to the complexity sciences in evaluation scholarship. Evaluation, 20(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014527885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser, R. (2019). Identifying general trends and patterns in complex system research: An overview of theoretical and practical implications. System Research and Behavioural Science, 36(1/2). https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2619
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. A., & Cilliers, P. (2001). What is complexity science? A view from different directions. Emergence, 3(1), 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Schore, A. (2001). Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 7–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0355(200101/04)22:1<7::AID-IMHJ2>3.0.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schore, A. N. (2021). The interpersonal neurobiology of intersubjectivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegenfeld, A. F., & Bar-yam, Y. (2020). An introduction to complex systems science and its applications. Complexity, 2020, 6105872. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6105872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76, 467–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, F. (1997). Chaos and social science. In R. Eve, S. Horsfall, & M. Lee (Eds.), Chaos, Complexity and social science (pp. xix–xxi) Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. R., & Baker, R. M. (2019). Complexity theory: An overview with potential applications for the social sciences. Systems, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar