Lessons from pragmatism: Organizational learning as resolving tensions at work

References

• Abbott, A. (2009). Organizations and the Chicago school. In P. S. Adler (Ed.), Sociology and organization studies (pp. 399–420). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1970). Sociological work: Method and substance. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. (2006). The pragmatic century. In S. G. Davaney & W. G. Frisina (Eds.), The pragmatic century: Conversations with Richard J. Bernstein (pp. 1–14). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyles, D. (2012). Dewey, ecology, and education: Historical and contemporary debates over Dewey’s naturalism and (transactional) realism. Educational Theory, 62(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00440.x
   Google Scholar
• Brandi, U., & Elkjaer, B. (2011). Organizational learning viewed from a social learning perspective. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2nd ed., pp. 23–41). John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brandi, U., & Elkjaer, B. (2013). Organisational learning: knowing in organising. In M. Kelemen & N. Rumens (Eds.), American pragmatism and organization. Issues and controversies (pp. 147–161). Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Brandi, U., & Elkjaer, B. (2016). Management education in a pragmatist perspective after Dewey’s experimentalism. In C. Steyaert, T. Beyes, & M. Parker (Eds.), The Routledge companion to reinventing management education (pp. 193–205). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (1991). Social worlds/arenas theory as organizational theory. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process. Essays in the Honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 119–158). Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609356938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963 [1992]) A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F. (2015). Relational sociology, pragmatism, transactions and social fields. International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1917 [1980]) The need for a recovery of philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924 (Vol. 10: 1916–1917, pp. 3–48). Carbondale and Edwardsville.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1922 [1988]). Human nature and conduct. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924 (Vol. 14: 1922, pp. 1–230). Carbondale and Edwardsville.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1929 [1984]). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. Gifford lectures. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953 (Vol. 4: 1929, pp. 1–250). Carbondale and Edwardsville.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933 [1986]). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953 (Vol. 8: 1933, pp. 105–352). Carbondale and Edwardsville.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938 [1986]). Logic. The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. (Vol. 12: 1938, pp. 1–539) Carbondale and Edwardsville.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938 [1988]). Experience and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953 (Vol. 13: 1938–1939, pp. 1–62).Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949 [1991]). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953 (Vol. 16: 1949–1952, pp. 1–294). Carbondale and Edwardsville.
   Google Scholar
• Elkjaer, B. (2012). Organisational learning won’t be turned off. In P. Jarvis & M. Watts (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of learning (pp. 237–245). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elkjaer, B. (2022a). The future is in the present. Learning and organizing in the field of organizational learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O'Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of learning and work (pp. 208–222). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Elkjaer, B. (2022b). Taking stock of “organizational learning”: Looking back and moving forward. Management Learning, 53(3), 582–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076211049599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkjaer, B., & Brandi, U. (2014). An organisational perspective on professionals’ learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (Vol. 2, pp. 835–856). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elkjaer, B., & Huysman, M. (2008). Social worlds theory and the power of tension. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organisation (pp. 170–177). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2010). Re-thinking the "thing": Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1–2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621011012898
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1978). The Chicago tradition and social change: Thomas, Park and their successors. Symbolic Interaction, 1(2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1978.1.2.5
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. (1994). Realism, Deweyan pragmatism, and educational research. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023001005
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations. The notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning, 29(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507698293002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilead, T., & Dishon, G. (2021). Rethinking future uncertainty in the shadow of COVID 19: Education, change, complexity and adaptability. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(6), 822–833.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P. (2004). Conceptions of learning and understanding learning at work. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P., & Beckett, D. (2019). The emergence of complexity: Rethinking education as a social science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P., & Beckett, D. (2022). Refurbishing learning via complexity theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2105696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00605.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2008). Epilogue: Situated learning and changing practice. In A. Amin & J. Roberts (Eds.), Community, economic creativity, and organization (pp. 283–296). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2019a). Introduction. The long life of learning in practice. In J. Lave (Ed.), Learning and everyday life. Access, participation, and changing practice (pp. 1–9). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2019b). Learning and everyday life. Access, participation, and changing practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2019c). Situated learning: Historical process and practice. In J. Lave (Ed.), Learning and everyday life. Access, participation, and changing practice (pp. 133–157). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934) [1967]. Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2008). Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00394.x
   Google Scholar
• Osberg, D., Biesta, G., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00407.x
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1995). Words and life. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1999). The threefold cord: Mind, body, and world. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. V. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. (2008). On the creative logic of education, or: Re‐reading Dewey through the lens of complexity science. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00409.x
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1978). A social world perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54(8), 979–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701548001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar