Inferentialist conceptual engineering

References

• Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert. 2000. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brigandt, Ingo. 2010. “The Epistemic Goal of a Concept: Accounting for the Rationality of Semantic Change and Variation.” ” Synthese 177 (1): 19–40. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9623-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2013. “Conceptual Ethics I.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1091–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2020. “On the Relation between Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.” Ratio 33 (4): 281–294. doi:10.1111/rati.12265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2020. “Conceptual Engineering: The Master Argument.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett, 132–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman, and David Plunkett. 2020. “Introduction - A Guided Tour of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett, 1–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, Rudolf. 1956. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, Rudolf. 1962. Logical Foundations of Probability. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, Max. 2020. “Speaker’s Reference, Stipulation, and a Dilemma for Conceptual Engineers.” Philosophical Studies 177 (12): 3935–3957. doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01416-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. (1879) 1972. Conceptual Notation: And Related Articles. Oxford Scholarly Classics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. 1979. Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?” Noûs 34 (1): 31–55. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, Manuel Gustavo. 2020. “How to Conceptually Engineer Conceptual Engineering?” Inquiry, January, 1–24. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2020.1719881.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Steffen. 2021a. “Engineering What? On Concepts in Conceptual Engineering.” Synthese 199 (1): 1955–1975. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02868-w.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Steffen. 2021b. “There is no Dilemma for Conceptual Engineering. Reply to Max Deutsch.” Philosophical Studies 178 (7): 2279–2291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitgeb, Hannes, and André Carus. 2020. “Rudolf Carnap.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2021 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/carnap/
   Google Scholar
• Löhr, Guido. 2020. “Concepts and Categorization: Do Philosophers and Psychologists Theorize About Different Things?” Synthese 197 (5): 2171–2191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löhr, Guido. 2021. “Commitment Engineering: Conceptual Engineering without Representations.” Synthese, August, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03365-4.
   Google Scholar
• Machery, Edouard. 2009. Doing Without Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machery, Edouard. 2017. Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nado, Jennifer. 2020. “Taking Control: Conceptual Engineering without (Much) Metasemantics.” Inquiry, November, 1–27. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2020.1850342.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Huw. 2011. Naturalism Without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, Jared. 2019. “Conceptual Engineers Shouldn’t Worry about Semantic Externalism.” Inquiry, October, 1–22. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1675534.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, Eleanor, and Caroline B. Mervis. 1975. “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories.” Cognitive Psychology 7 (4): 573–605. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Sarah. 2020. “Truth and Objectivity in Conceptual Engineering.” Inquiry 63 (9–10): 1001–1022. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2020.1805708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, Kevin. 2013. Replacing Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1953. “Inference and Meaning.” Mind 62 (247): 313–338.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, with an Introduction by Richard Rorty and a Study Guide by Robert Brandom. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sider, Theodore. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simion, Mona. 2018. “The ‘Should’ in Conceptual Engineering.” Inquiry 61 (8): 914–928. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2017.1392894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2020a. Norms and Necessity. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190098193.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2020b. “A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett, 435–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering: When Do We Need It? How Can We Do It?” Inquiry, November, 1–27. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2021.2000118.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, Jonathan M. 2006. “What’s Epistemology For? The Case for Neopragmatism in Normative Metaepistemology.” In Epistemological Futures, edited by Stephen Hetherington, 26–47. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar