Improving concepts, reshaping values: pragmatism and ameliorative projects

References

• Anderson, E. 2004. “Uses of Values Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 19: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, J. M. 1998. Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bettcher, T. 2013. “Trans Women and the Meaning of “Woman.” In The Philosophy of Sex, edited by N. Power, R. Halwani, and A. Soble, 233–249. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Brigandt, I. 2011. “Natural Kinds and Concepts: A Pragmatist and Methodologically Naturalistic Account.” In Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism, edited by J. Knowles and H. Rydenfelt, 171–196. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, A., and D. Plunkett. 2013. “Conceptual Ethics II.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1102–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H., and D. Plunkett. 2020. “Introduction: A Guided Tour of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2004. Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Congdon, M. 2022. Moral Articulation: On the Formation of New Moral Universals. Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1896. The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. In the Early Works, 1882-1898. Vol. 5. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1939. Theory of Valuation. The Later Works. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-León, E. 2016. “Woman as a Politically Significant Term: A Solution to the Puzzle.” Hypatia 31 (2): 245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-León, E. 2020. “Descriptive vs. Ameliorative Projects: The Role of Normative Considerations.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 170–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C. 2012. “Epistemic and Methodological Iteration in Scientific Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 376–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frega, R. 2009. “Expressive Inquiry and Practical Reasoning.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 23 (4): 307–327.
   Google Scholar
• Gascoigne, N. 2016. “Changing Minds: Pragmatism and Feminism.” Political Studies Review 14 (1): 50–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascoigne, N. 2021. Pragmatism, Conceptual Engineering and the Ethics of Controversy: A Fragment. Intervention at the Online Conference “Traditional Entanglements of Conceptual Engineering: American and Cambridge Pragmatism”, July 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoratto, F. 2020. “Reality and Resistance: Habermas and Haslanger on Objectivity, Social Critique, and the Possibility of Change.” In Critique in German Philosophy, edited by M. del Rosario Acosta and J. C. McQuillan, 357–375. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Nous (Detroit, Mich ) 34 (1): 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2005. “What Are We Talking About? The Semantics and Politics of Social Kinds.” Hypatia 20 (4): 10–26.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2020. “Going On, Not in the Same Way.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 230–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2021a. “Methods of Social Critique.” In Crisis and Critique: Philosophical Analysis and Current Events: Proceedings of the 42nd International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium, edited by A. Siegetsleitner, A. Oberprantacher, M. Frick, and U. Metschl, 139–156. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2021b. “Political Epistemology and Social Critique.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Vol. 7, edited by D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, and S. Wall. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192897480.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Huetter-Almerigi, Y. 2020. Two Forms of Realism”. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], XII-1, Online since June 16, 2020, connection on June 20, 2022. http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/1868. doi:10.4000/ejpap.1868.
   Google Scholar
• Huetter-Almerigi, Y. 2022. “Rorty on Realism, Antirealism,and Antirepresentationalism.” In Handbuch Richard Rorty, edited by M. Müller. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-16260-3_49-1
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, P., and G. Kemp. 2020. “Willard Van Orman Quine.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/quine/
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1891. “The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life. Reprinted in The Works of William James, Vol. 6.” In The Will to Believe: And Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, Introduction by E. H. Madden, edited by F. H. Burkhardt, F. Bowers, and I. K. Skrupskelis, 1979. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. 2016. “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman.” Ethics 126 (2): 394–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joas, H. 2000. The Genesis of Values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, H. 2008. “The Cultural Values of Europe: An Introduction.” In The Cultural Values of Europe, edited by H. Joas and K. Wiegandt, 1–21. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jorem, S. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering and the Implementation Problem.” Inquiry 64 (1–2): 186–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, M. 2009. Der Bewusste Ausdruck. Anthropologie der Artikulation. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobe, J., S. Prasada, and G. E. Newman. 2013. “Dual Character Concepts and the Normative Dimension of Conceptual Representation.” Cognition 127 (2): 242–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, S. 2020. “There Is no Dilemma for Conceptual Engineering. Reply to Max Deutsch.” Philosophical Studies 178: 2279–2291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, A. 1935. “Values and Imperatives.” In American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow, edited by H. M. Kallen and S. Hook, 313–336. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maddalena, G. 2015. The Philosophy of Gesture. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkola, M. 2008. “Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender.” In Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Summer ed., edited by E. N. Zelna. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2008/entries/feminism-gender/.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, C. 2022. “A New History and Underpinning for Conceptual Engineering.” Inquiry. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2021.2021982.
   Google Scholar
• Queloz, M., and F. Bieber. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering and the Politics of Implementation.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. doi:10.1111/papq.12394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railton, P. 2003. Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saul, J. 2012. “Politically Significant Terms and Philosophy of Language: Methodological Issues.” In Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy, edited by S. Crasnow and A. Superson, 195–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano Zamora, J. 2017. “Articulating a Sense of Powers: An Expressivist Reading of John Dewey’s Theory of Social Movements.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (1): 53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano Zamora, J. 2021. Democratization and Struggles Against Injustice. A Pragmatist Approach to the Epistemic Practices of Social Movements. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano Zamora, J., and M. Santarelli. 2021. “Populism or Pragmatism? Two Ways of Understanding Political Articulation.” Constellations (Oxford, England) 28 (4): 496–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A., A. Copeland, N. Chester, J. Malley, and N. Barenbaum. 1997. Separating Together: How Divorce Transforms Families. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1985. Philosophical Papers I: Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiercelin, C. 2019. Pragmatism and Vagueness. The Venetian Lectures. Edited by G. Tuzet. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.
   Google Scholar
• Viola, T. 2019. “From Vague Symbols to Contested Concepts: Peirce, W.B. Gallie, and History.” History and Theory 58 (2): 233–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola, T. 2022. Jane Addams, Folkloric Transmission, and Social Critique. Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar