Normative standards and the epistemology of conceptual ethics

References

• Ayer, A. J. 1952 (1936). Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Karen. 2009. “Composition, Colocation, and Metaontology.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman, 38–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Simon. 1993. Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett. 2020. Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2013a. “Conceptual Ethics I.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1091–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2013b. “Conceptual Ethics II.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1102–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2020. “On the Relation Between Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.” Ratio 33 (4): 281–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2020. “Conceptual Engineering: The Master Argument.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 132–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. Manuscript. “The Concept of Democracy: An Essay on Conceptual Amelioration and Abandonment.”
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman, and David Plunkett. 2020. “A Guided Tour of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darwall, Stephen L. 1998. Philosophical Ethics. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorr, Cian, and John Hawthorne. 2013. “Naturalness.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 8, edited by K. Bennett and D. Zimmerman, 3–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreier, Jamie. 2012. “Quasi-Realism and the Problem of Unexplained Coincidence.” Analytic Philosophy 53 (3): 269–287.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. “Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (2): 87–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, Matti. 2017. Choosing Normative Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, David. 2011. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Kit. 2001. “The Question of Realism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 1: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, Stephen. 2014. Confusion of Tongues: A Theory of Normative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, William. 2008. “Robust Ethical Realism, Non-Naturalism, and Normativity.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 3: 159–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan. 2003. Thinking How to Live. Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan. 2011. “How Much Realism? Evolved Thinkers and Moral Concepts.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 33–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Noûs 34 (1): 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally. 2020. “Going On, Not in the Same Way.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 230–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Frank. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, Richard. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, Sebastian. 2021. “How to Have Your Quasi-Cake and Quasi-Eat It Too.” The Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51: 204–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and Conditionals: New and Revised Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenman, James. 2000. “Consequentialism and Cluelessness.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (4): 342–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1983. “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1989. “Dispositional Theories of Value.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 63: 113–137.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, Dustin. 2017. “The Epistemic Significant of Moral Disagreement.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, edited by T. McPherson and D. Plunkett, 499–518. New York City: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, Sarah. 2011. “Skepticism about Moral Expertise as a Puzzle for Moral Realism.” Journal of Philosophy 108 (3): 111–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2012. “Unifying Moral Methodology.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (4): 523–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2015a. “The Methodological Irrelevance of Reflective Equilibrium.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, edited by C. Daly, 652–674. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2015b. “What is at Stake in Debates among Normative Realists?” Noûs 49 (1): 123–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2018a. “Authoritatively Normative Concepts.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 13, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 253–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2018b. “Naturalistic Moral Realism, Moral Rationalism, and Non-Fundamental Epistemology.” In The Many Moral Rationalisms, edited by K. Jones and F. Schroeter, 187–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2020. Epistemology and Methodology in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2022. “Expressivism Without Minimalism.” In Meaning, Decision, and Norms: Themes from the Work of Allan Gibbard, edited by B. Dunaway and D. Plunkett, 147–170. Ann Arbor, MI: Maize Books, University of Michigan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. 2017. “The Nature and Explanatory Ambitions of Metaethics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, edited by T. McPherson and D. Plunkett, 1–25. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. 2020. “Conceptual Ethics and the Methodology of Normative Inquiry.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 274–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. 2021a. “Conceptual Ethics, Metaepistemology, and Normative Epistemology.” Inquiry: 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. 2021b. “Evaluation Turned on Itself: The Vindicatory Circularity Challenge to the Conceptual Ethics of Normativity.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 16, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 207–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. 2021c. “Metaethics and the Conceptual Ethics of Normativity.” Inquiry: 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. 2021d. “Topic Continuity in Conceptual Engineering and Beyond.” Inquiry: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. Forthcoming. “Ground, Essence, and the Metaphysics of Metanormative Non-Naturalism.” Ergo.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. Manuscript-a. “Conceptual Ethics and the Categories of ‘Ideal Theory’ and ‘Non-Ideal Theory’ in Political Philosophy: A Proposal for Abandonment.”
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. Manuscript-b. “Strong AI and the Foundations of Ethics.”
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. E. 1993 (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Carballo, Alejandro. 2020. “Conceptual Evaluation: Epistemic.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 304–332. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David. 2015. “Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy.” Inquiry 58 (7-8): 828–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David, and Tim Sundell. 2013. “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (23): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David, and Tim Sundell. 2021. “Metalinguistic Negotiation and Matters of Language: A Response to Cappelen.” Inquiry: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, Willard V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60 (1): 20–43.
   Google Scholar
• Railton, Peter. 1986. “Moral Realism.” The Philosophical Review 95: 163–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railton, Peter. 2003. Facts, Values, and Norms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1980. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 2014. Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharp, Kevin. 2020. “Philosophy as the Study of Defective Concepts.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 396–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schechter, Joshua. 2017. “Explanatory Challenges in Metaethics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, edited by T. McPherson and D. Plunkett, 443–458. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schechter, Joshua. Manuscript. “Does Expressivism Enjoy an Epistemological Advantage Over Realism?”
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark. 2007. Slaves of the Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark. 2014. “Does Expressivism Have Subjectivist Consequences?” Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1): 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer-Landau, Russ. 2003. Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sider, Theodore. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silk, Alex. 2016. Discourse Contextualism: A Framework for Contextualist Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Michael. 2012. “Agents and Patients, or: What We Learn about Reasons for Action by Reflecting on Our Choices in Process of Thought Cases.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (3): 309–331.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Michael. 2013. “A Constitutivist Theory of Reasons: Its Promise and Parts.” LEAP: Law, Ethics, and Philosophy 1: 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Stich, Stephen. 2011. Collected Philosophical Papers Volume 1: Mind and Language, 1972–2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, Sharon. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, Sharon. 2011. “Mind-Independence Without the Mystery: Why Quasi-Realists Can’t Have It Both Ways.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 6, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, Sharon. 2012. “Coming to Terms with Contingency: Humean Constructivism about Practical Reason.” In Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, edited by J. Lenman and Y. Shemmer, 40–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2015. Ontology Made Easy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2016. “Metaphysical Disputes and Metalinguistic Negotiation.” Analytic Philosophy 57 (4): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 2020. “A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 435–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, Manuel. 2013. Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vavova, Katia. 2018. “Irrelevant Influences.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1): 134–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigner, Eugene. 1960. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences.” Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1991 (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar