Conceptual engineering and pragmatism: historical and theoretical perspectives

References

• Blackburn, Simon. 1999. Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert B. 2000. “Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism and Historicism.” In Rorty and His Critics, edited by Robert B. Brandom, 156–182. Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.4159/9780674270572-006.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert. 2001. “Modality, Normativity, and Intentionality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3): 587–609. https://doi.org/10.2307/3071157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Matthew J. 2020. Science and Moral Imagination: A New Ideal for Values in Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2013. “Conceptual Ethics I.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1091–1101. doi:10.1111/phc3.12086.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2020. “On the Relation between Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.” Ratio 33 (4): 281–294. doi:10.1111/rati.12265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198814719.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, Rudolf. 1947. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David J. 2011. “Revisability and Conceptual Change in ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’.” The Journal of Philosophy 108 (8): 387–415. doi:10.5840/jphil2011108821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creath, Richard. 1990. Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work: Edited and with an Introduction by Richard Creath. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1920. Reconstruction in Philosophy. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1925. Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1934. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. London: G. Allen & Unwin Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-León, Esa. 2020. “Descriptive vs. Ameliorative Projects: The Role of Normative Considerations.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett, 170–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0009
   Google Scholar
• Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2020. “Carnapian Explication and Ameliorative Analysis: A Systematic Comparison.” Synthese 197 (3): 1011–1034. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1732-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, Matti. 2015. “Intuitions, Conceptual Engineering, and Conceptual Fixed Points.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, edited by Christopher Daly, 363–385. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, Luciani. 2011. “A Defence of Constructionism: Philosophy as Conceptual Engineering.” Metaphilosophy 42 (3): 282–304. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01693.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronda, Roberto. 2020. Dewey’s Philosophy of Science. Synthese Library. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37562-1
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?” Noûs 34 (1): 31–55. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892631.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally. 2020. “Going On, Not in the Same Way.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Sally Haslanger, 230–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally, and Jennifer Saul. 2006. “Philosophical Analysis and Social Kinds.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80: 89–143. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8349.2006.00139.x.
   Google Scholar
• Huetter-Almerigi, Yvonne. 2020. “Two Forms of Realism.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy XII (1). doi:10.4000/ejpap.1868.
   Google Scholar
• Huetter-Almerigi, Yvonne. 2022. “Rorty on realism, antirealism, and antirepresentationalism.” In Handbuch Richard Rorty, edited by Martin Müller. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-16260-3_49-1.
   Google Scholar
• Huetter-Almerigi, Yvonne, and Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg. 2022. “Analytic Philosophy of Language Wittgenstein, Sellars, Quine, Davidson, Kuhn.” In Handbuch Richard Rorty, edited by Martin Müller. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-16260-3_67-1.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, Manuel Gustavo. 2021. “Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?” Erkenntnis, doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00447-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llanera, Tracy. 2019. “‘The Law of the Land Has God’s Anointing’ – Rorty on Religion, Language, and Politics.” Pragmatism Today 10 (1): 46–61.
   Google Scholar
• Löhr, Guido. 2021. ““Commitment Engineering: Conceptual Engineering without Representations.” Synthese, doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03365-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder, Mark. 2020. “On Strawson’s Critique of Explication as a Method in Philosophy.” Synthese 197 (3): 955–981. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1614-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Huw. 2011. Naturalism Without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prinzing, Michael. 2018. “The Revisionist’s Rubric: Conceptual Engineering and the Discontinuity Objection.” Inquiry 61 (8): 854–880. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2017.1385522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625398
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary, and Emeritus Hilary Putnam. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Queloz, Matthieu. 2021. The Practical Origins of Ideas: Genealogy as Conceptual Reverse-Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramberg, Bjørn. 2000. “Post-Ontological Philosophy of Mind: Rorty versus Davidson.” In Rorty and His Critics, edited by Robert B. Brandom, 351–370. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1980. “Pragmatism, Relativism, and Irrationalism.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 53 (6): 717–738. doi:10.2307/3131427.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 2000a. “Response to Ramberg.” In Rorty and His Critics, edited by Robert Brandom, 370–377. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 2000b. “Response to Brandom.” In Rorty and His Critics, edited by Robert Brandom, 183–190. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Sarah. 2018. “The Importance of Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (2): 127–147. doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoy008.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Sarah. 2020. “Talk and Thought.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett, 379–395. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0018
   Google Scholar
• Scharp, Kevin. 2013. Replacing Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653850.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Simion, Mona, and Christoph Kelp. 2020. “Conceptual Innovation, Function First.” Noûs 54 (4): 985–1002. doi:10.1111/nous.12302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie. 2015. Ontology Made Easy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199385119.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie. 2020. “A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, and David Plunkett, 435–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0021.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering: When Do We Need It? How Can We Do It?” Inquiry 0 (0): 1–26. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2021.2000118.
   Google Scholar
• Tirrell, Lynne. 2012. “Genocidal Language Games.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, edited by Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 174–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar