1,682
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

What is the Source of Hypnotic Responses?

ORCID Icon
Pages 64-83 | Received 21 May 2023, Accepted 04 Jul 2023, Published online: 07 Dec 2023

References

  • Baker, S. L., & Kirsch, I. (1993). Hypnotic and placebo analgesia: Order effects and the placebo label. Contemporary Hypnosis, 10(3), 117–126.
  • Barber, T. X. (1965). Measuring “hypnotic-like” suggestibility with and without “hypnotic induction”; Psychometric properties, norms, and variables influencing response to the Barber Suggestibility Scale (BSS). Psychological Reports, 16(3), 809–844. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.16.3.809
  • Barber, T. X. (1979). Suggested (“hypnotic”) behavior: The trance paradigm versus an alternative paradigm. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 217–271). Aldine Publishing Company.
  • Barber, T. X. (2000). A deeper understanding of hypnosis: Its secrets, its nature, its essence. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 42(3–4), 208–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2000.10734361
  • Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1962). “Hypnotic behavior” as a function of task motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1962.9713126
  • Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1963a). The relative effectiveness of task-motivating instructions and trance-induction procedure in the production of “hypnotic-like” behaviors. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 137(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196308000-00001
  • Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1963b). Toward a theory of “hypnotic” behavior: Effects on suggestibility of task motivating instructions and attitudes toward hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(6), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047040
  • Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1968). Toward a theory of “hypnotic” behavior: Replication and extension of experiments by Barber and co-workers (1962–65) and Hilgard and Tart (1966). International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146808410589
  • Barber, T. X., & Glass, L. B. (1962). Significant factors in hypnotic behavior. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041347
  • Barnier, A. J., Dienes, Z., & Mitchell, C. (2008). How hypnosis happens: New cognitive theories of hypnotic responding. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 141–177). Oxford University Press.
  • Barnier, A. J., Terhune, D. B., Polito, V., & Woody, E. (2022). A componential approach to individual differences in hypnotizability. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research & Practice, 9(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000267
  • Bernheim, H. (1886/1947). Suggestive therapeutics: A treatise on the nature and uses of hypnotism. London Book Company.
  • Bernheim, H. (1917). Automatisme et suggestion [Automatism and suggestion]. Félix Alcan.
  • Bertrand, A. (1823). Traité du somnambulisme [Treatise on sleepwalking]. Dentu.
  • Bowers, K. S. (1966). Hypnotic behavior: The differentiation of trance and demand variables. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022825
  • Bowers, K. S. (1967). The effect of demands for honesty on reports of visual and auditory hallucinations. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 15(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146708407503
  • Braffman, W., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 578–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.578
  • Braid, J. (1843). Neurypnology: Or the rationale of nervous sleep considered in relation with animal magnetism. John Churchill.
  • Braid, J. (1846). The power of the mind over the body: An experimental inquiry into the nature and cause of the phenomena attributed by Baron Reichenbach and others to a “new imponderable.” John Churchill.
  • Braid, J. (1855/1970). The physiology of fascination and the critics criticized. In M. M. Tinterow (Ed.), Foundations of hypnosis: From Mesmer to Freud (pp. 365–389). Charles C. Thomas. (Original work published 1855).
  • Bryant, R. A., Moulds, M. L., Guthrie, R. M., & Nixon, R. D. V. (2005). The additive benefit of hypnosis and cognitive-behavioral therapy in treating acute stress disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(2), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.334
  • Christensen, C. C. (2005). Preferences for descriptors of hypnosis: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140590961358
  • Claparède, E., & Baade, W. (1909). Recherches experimental sur quelques phenomenes simple dans un cas d’hypnose [Experimental research on simple phenomena in a case of hypnosis]. Archives de Psychologie, 297–394.
  • Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., Vickery, A. R., & Carlson, D. (1983). “Trance” versus “skill” hypnotic inductions: The effects of credibility, expectancy, and experimenter modeling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.432
  • Crabtree, A. (1993). From Mesmer to Freud: Magnetic sleep and the roots of psychological healing. Yale University Press.
  • Damer, T. E. (1994). Attacking faulty reasoning: A practical guide to fallacy-free arguments (3rd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Delboeuf, J. (1891–1892). Comme quoi il n’y a pas d’hypnotisme [So it turns out there is no hypnotism]. Revue de l’hypnotisme, 6, 129–135.
  • Dell, P. F. (1985). Understanding Bateson and Maturana: Toward a biological foundation for the social sciences. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1985.tb00587.x
  • Dell, P. F. (2017). What is the essence of hypnosis? The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 65(2), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2017.1276360
  • Dell, P. F. (2019). Reconsidering the autohypnotic model of the dissociative disorders. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 20(1), 48–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2018.1451806
  • Dell, P. F. (2021). Hypnotizability and the natural human ability to alter experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 69(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.1834859
  • Dell, P. F. (2022). Clarifying the etiology of the dissociative disorders: It’s not all about trauma. In M. Dorahy & S. Gold (Eds.), Dissociation and the dissociative disorders: Past, present, future (pp. 238–260). Routledge.
  • Dienes, Z., Lush, P., Palfi, B., Roseboom, W., Scott, R., Parris, B., Seth, A., & Lovell, M. (2022). Phenomenological control as cold control. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research & Practice, 9(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000230
  • Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. R., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2015.1011465
  • Ellenberger, H. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious. Basic Books.
  • Erickson, M. H. (1932). Possible detrimental effects of experimental hypnosis. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27(3), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072519
  • Faria, J. C. (1819). De la cause du sommeil lucide: ou etude de la nature de l’homme [On the cause of lucid sleep: Or study of the nature of man]. Mme. Horiac.
  • Flammer, E., & Bongartz, W. (2003). On the efficacy of hypnosis: A meta-analytic study. Contemporary Hypnosis, 20(4), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.277
  • Gandhi, B., & Oakley, D. A. (2005). Does ‘hypnosis’ by any other name smell as sweet? The efficacy of ‘hypnotic’ inductions depends on the label ‘hypnosis’. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.12.004
  • Gauld, A. (1992). A history of hypnotism. Cambridge University Press.
  • Glass, L. B., & Barber, T. X. (1961). A note on hypnotic behavior, the definition of the situation, and the placebo effect. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 132(6), 539–541. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196106000-00009
  • Green, J. P., Barabasz, A. F., Barrett, D., & Montgomery, G. H. (2005). Forging ahead: The 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140590961321
  • Halligan, P. W., & Oakley, D. A. (2014). Hypnosis and beyond: Exploring the broader domain of suggestion. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research & Practice, 1(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000019
  • Harrington, A. (2016). Thinking about trance over a century: The making of a set of impasses. In A. Raz & M. Lifshitz (Eds.), Hypnosis and meditation: Towards an integrative science of conscious planes (pp. 19–30). Oxford University Press.
  • Hilgard, E. R. (1964). Profiles of hypnotizability. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 7(2), 136–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1964.10402407
  • Hilgard, E. R. (1973). The domain of hypnosis: With some comments on alternative paradigms. American Psychologist, 28(11), 972–982. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035452
  • Hilgard, E. R. (1977/1986). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hilgard, E. R., & Tart, C. T. (1966). Responsiveness to suggestions following waking and imagination instructions and following induction of hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71(3), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023323
  • Holroyd, J. (2003). The science of meditation and the state of hypnosis. The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 46(2), 109–128.
  • Hope, A. E., & Sugarman, L. I. (2015). Orienting hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(3), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.976787
  • Hull, C. L. (1929). Hypnotism in scientific perspective. Scientific Monthly, 29(2), 154–162.
  • Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility: An experimental approach. Appleton-Century Crofts.
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company.
  • Janet, P. (1925). Psychological healing. Allen & Unwin.
  • Jensen, M. P., Jamieson, G. A., Lutz, A., Mazzoni, G., McGeown, W. J., Santarcangelo, E. L., Demertzi, A., De Pascalis, V., Bányai, É. I., Rominger, C., Vuilleumier, P., Faymonville, M. E., & Terhune, D. B. (2017). New directions in hypnosis research: Strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix004
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
  • Kallio, S., & Revonsuo, A. (2003). Hypnotic phenomena and altered states of consciousness: A multilevel framework of description and explanation. Contemporary Hypnosis, 20(3), 111–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.273
  • Kihlstrom, J. F. (2001). Hypnosis and the psychological unconscious. Assessment and Therapy, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012267806-6/50052-4
  • Kihlstrom, J. F. (2008). The domain of hypnosis, revisited. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 21–52). Oxford University Press.
  • Kihlstrom, J. F. (2013). Neuro-hypnotism: Prospects for hypnosis and neuroscience. Cortex, 49(2), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.016
  • Kirsch, I. (1985). Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior. American Psychologist, 40(11), 1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.11.1189
  • Kirsch, I. (1990). Changing expectations: A key to effective psychotherapy. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  • Kirsch, I. (1991). The social learning theory of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 439–465). Guilford Press.
  • Kirsch, I. (1993). Professional opinions about hypnosis: Results of the APA Division 30 survey. Psychological Hypnosis, 2(3), 4–5.
  • Kirsch, I., Cardeña, E., Derbyshire, S., Dienes, Z., Heap, M., Kallio, S., Mazzoni, G., Naish, P., Oakley, D., Potter, C., & Whalley, M. (2011). Definitions of hypnosis and hypnotizability and their relation to suggestion and suggestibility: A consensus statement. Contemporary Hypnosis and Integrative Therapy, 28(9), 107–115.
  • Kirsch, I., Council, J. R., & Mobayed, C. (1987). Imagery and response expectancy as determinants of hypnotic behavior. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 4, 25–31.
  • Kirsch, I., Mazzoni, G., & Montgomery, G. (2007). Remembrance of hypnosis past. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 49(3), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2007.10401574
  • Kirsch, I., Mazzoni, G., Roberts, K., Dienes, Z., Hallquist, M. N., Williams, J., & Lynn, S. J. (2008). Slipping into trance. Contemporary Hypnosis, 25(3–4), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.361
  • Kirsch, I., Montgomery, G., & Sapirstein, G. (1995a). Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive- behavioral psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.2.214
  • Kirsch, I., Silva, C. E., Comey, G., & Reed, S. (1995b). A spectral analysis of cognitive and personality variables in hypnosis: Empirical disconfirmation of the two-factor model of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.167
  • Laurence, J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., & du Chéné, T. (2008). Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–253). Oxford University Press.
  • Laurence, J.-R., & Perry, C. (1988). Hypnosis, will, and memory: A psycho-legal history. Guilford Press.
  • Liébault, A. A. (1866). Du Sommeil et des États analogues surtout au point de vue de l’ action du moral sur le physique [Sleep and related states, especially from the point of view of moral action on the body]. V. Masson et Fils.
  • Lush, P., Botan, V., Scott, R. B., Seth, A. K., Ward, J., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Trait phenomenological control predicts experience of mirror synaesthesia and the rubber hand illusion. Nature Communications, 11(1), 4853. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18591-6
  • Lush, P., Roseboom, W., Cleeremans, A., Scott, R. B., Seth, A. K., & Dienes, Z. (2019). Intentional binding as bayesian cue combination: Testing predictions with trait individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(9), 1206–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000661
  • Lynn, S. J., Green, J. P., Kirsch, I., Capafons, A., Lilienfeld, S. O., Laurence, J.-R., & Montgomery, G. H. (2015a). Grounding hypnosis in science: The “new” APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis as a step backward. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(4), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2015.1011472
  • Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., & Hallquist, M. N. (2008). Social cognitive theories of hypnosis. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 111–139). Oxford University Press.
  • Lynn, S. J., Laurence, J.-R., & Kirsch, I. (2015b). Hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility: An integrative model. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(3), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.976783
  • Maturana, H. R. (1990). Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In W. Krohn, G. Küppers, & H. Nowotny (Eds.), Self-organization: Portrait of a scientific revolution (pp. 12–35). Kluwer.
  • Meyer, E. C., & Lynn, S. J. (2011). Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: Performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2011.570660
  • Milling, L. S., Coursen, E. L., Shores, J. S., & Waszkiewicz, J. A. (2010). The predictive utility of hypnotizability: The change in suggestibility produced by hypnosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(1), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017388
  • Mohl, J. C. (2013). Are highly hypnotizable people naturally aware of their hypnotic talents? Implications for human potentialities. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 61(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2013.784066
  • Montgomery, G. H., David, D., Winkel, G., Silverstein, J. H., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2002). The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: A meta-analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 94(6), 1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-200206000-00052
  • Montgomery, G. H., Duhamel, K. N., & Redd, W. H. (2000). A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: How effective is hypnosis? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140008410045
  • Munson, S. O., Trenkle, B., & Gallawa, R. (2015). Preferences for descriptors of hypnosis: The international point of view. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(3), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2015.1031536
  • Nadon, R. (1997). What this field needs is a good nomological network. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45(3), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149708416132
  • Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2009). Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(6), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.004
  • Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2013). Hypnotic suggestion: Opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3538
  • Oakley, D. A., Walsh, E., Mehta, M. A., Halligan, P. W., & Deeley, Q. (2021). Direct verbal suggestibility: Measurement and significance. Consciousness and Cognition, 89, 103036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.103036
  • Orne, M. T. (1959). The nature of hypnosis: Artifact and essence. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046128
  • Pattie, F. A. (1994). Mesmer and animal magnetism: A chapter in the history of medicine. Edmonston.
  • Pintar, J. (2010). Il n’y a pas d’hypnotisme: A history of hypnosis in theory and practice. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (2nd ed., pp. 19–46). American Psychological Association.
  • Pintar, J., & Lynn, S. J. (2008). Hypnosis: A brief history. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Puységur, A. M. J. (1784). Memoires pour servir a l’establissement du magnetism animal [Experiences with animal magnetism]. Cellot.
  • Reid, D. B. (2016). Hypnotic induction: Enhancing trance or mostly myth? American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 59(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2016.1190310
  • Santarcangelo, E. L., & Scattina, E. (2016). Complementing the latest APA definition of hypnosis: Sensory-motor and vascular peculiarities involved in hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 64(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2016.1171093
  • Sarbin, T. R. (1950). Contributions to role-taking theory: I. Hypnotic behavior. Psychological Review, 57(5), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062218
  • Schoenberger, N. E. (2000). Research on hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140008410046
  • Spanos, N. P. (1982). Hypnotic behavior: A cognitive social psychological perspective. Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavior, 7(2), 199–213.
  • Spanos, N. P. (1986). Hypnotic behavior: A social-psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and “trance logic”. The Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 9(3), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00046537
  • Spanos, N. P., & Gottlieb, D. R. (1979). Demonic possession, mesmerism, and hysteria: A social psychological perspective on their historical interrelations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88(5), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.88.5.527
  • Stam, H. J., & Spanos, N. P. (1980). Experimental designs, expectancy effects, and hypnotic analgesia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89(6), 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.89.6.751
  • Sutcliffe, J. P. (1960). “Credulous” and “sceptical” views of hypnotic phenomena: A review of certain evidence and methodology. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 8(2), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146008415837
  • Sutcliffe, J. P. (1961). ”Credulous” and “skeptical” views of hypnotic phenomena: Experiments on esthesia, hallucination, and delusion. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 189–endash200. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046745 2
  • Tart, C. T., & Hilgard, E. R. (1966). Responsiveness to suggestions under “hypnosis” and “waking-imaginations” conditions: A methodological observation. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 14(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207146608412967
  • Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(A), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002
  • Terhune, D. B., & Oakley, D. A. (2020). Hypnosis and imagination. In A. Abraham (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 711–727). Cambridge University Press.
  • Wagstaff, G. F. (1981). Hypnosis, compliance, and belief. St. Martin’s Press.
  • Wagstaff, G. F. (1986). Hypnosis as compliance and belief. In P. L. N. Naish (Ed.), What is hypnosis? Current theories and research (pp. 37–58). Open University Press.
  • Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1978a). Hypnotism and altered states. In A. A. Sugerman & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Expanding dimensions of consciousness (pp. 183–225). Springer.
  • Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1978b). What did he (Bernheim) say? In F. H. Frankel & H. S. Zamansky (Eds.), Hypnosis at its bicentennial (pp. 47–56). Plenum.
  • Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1980). Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22(3), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1980.10403217
  • Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1989). The practice of hypnotism: Vol. 1. Traditional and semi-traditional techniques and phenomenology. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Sjöberg, B. M., Jr. (1961). Suggestibility with and without “induction of hypnosis”. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 132(3), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196103000-00002
  • White, R. W. (1941). A preface to the theory of hypnotism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36(4), 477–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053844
  • Yeates, L. B. (2016). Émile Coué and his method (III): Every day in every way. Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy & Hypnosis, 38(1), 55–79.
  • Young, P. C. (1925). An experimental study of mental and physical functions in the normal and hypnotic states. The American Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/1413859
  • Young, P. C. (1927). Is rapport an essential characteristic of hypnosis? The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 22(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075791
  • Zamansky, H. S., Scharf, B., & Brightbill, R. (1964). The effect of expectancy for hypnosis on prehypnotic performance. Journal of Personality, 32(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1964.tb01338.x