Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale in a Clinical Population

References

• BalthazardC. G. (1993). The hypnosis scales at their centenary: Some fundamental issues still unresolved. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149308414537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1985). The“stuff” of hypnotic performance: A review of psychometric approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2004). Defining and identifying the highly hypnotizable person. In M. Heap, R. Brown, & D. Oakley (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues (pp. 30–60). Brunner- Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487822-5
   Google Scholar
• Bates, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in response to hypnosis. In J. W. Rhue, S. J. Lynn, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (pp. 23–54). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10274-002
   Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, W. C., & Sarbin, T. R. (1971). An alternative interpretation to the multiple composition of hypnotic scales: A single role-relevant skill. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506
   Google Scholar
• Council, J. R. (2002). A historical overview of hypnotizability assessment. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44(3–4), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2002.10403480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R. (2014). Hypnotic relaxation therapy: Principles and applications. Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R. (2022). Introduction to clinical hypnosis: The basics and beyond. Mountain Pine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R., Fisher, W. I., Johnson, A. K., Carpenter, J. S., & Keith, T. Z. (2013). Clinical hypnosis in the treatment of post-menopausal hot flashes: A randomized controlled trial. Menopause, 20(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b013e31826ce3ed
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015a). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2015.1011465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. R., Johnson, A. K., Johnson, A. J., & Sliwinski, J. (2015b). Factor analysis of the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 63(3), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2015.1031550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, E., & Nash, M. R. (Eds.). (1992). Contemporary hypnosis research. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kekecs, Z., Bowers, J., Johnson, A., Kendrick, C., & Elkins, G. (2016). The Elkins Hypnotizability Scale: Assessment of reliability and validity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 64(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2016.1171089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kekecs, Z., Roberts, L., Na, H., Yek, M. H., Slonena, E. E., Racelis, E., Voor, T. A., Johansson, R., Rizzo, P., Csikos, E., Vizkievicz, V., & Elkins, G. (2021). Test-retest reliability of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C and the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 69(1), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.1834858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (1999). Conscious versus unconscious cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 173–203). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4877.003.0009
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2011). Equivalence of reading and listening comprehension across test media. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(5), 849–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410391468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Consulting Psychologists Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/t02246-000
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1997). Hypnotic susceptibility: A personal and historical note regarding the development and naming of the Stanford Scales. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149708416114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, forms A and B. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility, form C. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1963). Stanford profile scales of hypnotic susceptibility, forms I and II. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need and how should we use them. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 255–282). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198570097.013.0010
   Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2005). Multiple hypnotizabilities: Differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Vol. 30). University of California.
   Google Scholar