A heterogeneous picture fuzzy SWARA-MARCOS evaluation framework based on a novel cross-entropy measure

References

• Aleksandar, M., Adis, P., Branka, S. B., & Zoran, G. (2021). A model for supporting the decision of plum variety selection based on fuzzy logic. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 22(2), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/22.2.2946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, J. (2021). A novel score function based CRITIC-MARCOS method with spherical fuzzy information. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 40(8), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Atagün, A. O., & Kamacı, H. (2023). Strait fuzzy sets, strait fuzzy rough sets and their similarity measures-based decision making systems. International Journal of Systems Science, 54(12), 2519–2535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2023.2233971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaouki, G., Mona, A., & Maamar, B. (2020). Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method. Renewable Energy, 146, 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. X., Lin, M. W., He, Z., Polat, K., Alhudhaif, A., & Alenezi, F. (2023). Consistency- and dependence-guided knowledge distillation for object detection in remote sensing images. Expert Systems with Applications, 229, 120519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Y. F., Liu, W., Pratibha, R., & Melfi, A. (2021). Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 120951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuong, B. C., & Kreinovich, V. (2014). Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, 30(4), 409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Dalkılıç, O. (2022). A decision-making approach to reduce the margin of error of decision makers for bipolar soft set theory. International Journal of Systems Science, 53(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2021.1949644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2021). MARCOS technique under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for determining the COVID-19 pandemic performance of insurance companies in terms of healthcare services. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 104, 107199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, E. D. (2021). Picture fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method with unknown attribute weights and its application. Application Research of Computers, 38(12), 3657–3672.
   Google Scholar
• Han, E. D., Guo, P., & Zhao, J. (2018). Decision-making of mixed evaluation information supplier selection based on distance measure and support degree. Operations Research and Management Science, 27(9), 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Wang, M. Q. (2024). Heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making based on a fuzzy data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency model. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 121914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. R., Aziz, M. T., Alauddin, M., Kader, Z., & Islam, M. R. (2023). Sites suitability assessment for solar power plants in Bangladesh: A GIS-based analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. Renewable Energy, 220(119595).
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Y., Huang, G. H., & Sun, W. (2015). Risk assessment of hydropower stations through an integrated fuzzy entropy-weight multiple criteria decision-making method: a case study of the Xiangxi river. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(12), 5380–5389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, Y. B., Ju, D., Gonzalez, E. D. S., Giannakis, M., & Wang, A. (2019). Study of site selection of electric vehicle charging station based on extended GRP method under picture fuzzy environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 1271–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y. Y., Qin, J. D., Martínez, L., & Liu, J. (2020). A heterogeneous QUALIFLEX method with criteria interaction for multi-criteria group decision making. Information Sciences, 512, 1481–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M. W., Chen, Z. Y., Liao, H. C., & Xu, Z. S. (2019). ELECTRE II method to deal with probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application to edge computing. Nonlinear Dynamics, 96(3), 2125–2143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-04910-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. C., You, J. X., & Lin, Q. L. (2015). Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28(7), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2014.900865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miomir, S., Željko, S., Dillip, K. D., Marko, S., & Dragan, P. (2020). A new fuzzy MARCOS method for road traffic risk analysis. Mathematics, 8(457).
   Google Scholar
• Morente-Molinera, J. A., Wang, Y., Gong, Z. W., Morfeq, A., Al-Hmouz, R., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Reducing criteria in multicriteria group decision-making methods using hierarchical clustering methods and fuzzy ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(6), 1585–1598. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3062145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., & Deveci, M. (2021). Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. Science of the Total Environment, 788, 147763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J. J., Chen, X. G., Long, Q. Q., & Zhang, S. Z. (2023a). A picture fuzzy evaluation framework based on a novel approach incorporating bidirectional projection measures and the VIKOR method. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(S2), 2235–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10576-3
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. J., Chen, X. G., Tian, C., Zhang, Z. Q., Song, H. Y., & Dong, F. (2022). Picture fuzzy large-scale group decision-making in a trust-relationship-based social network environment. Information Sciences, 608, 1675–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J. J., Chen, X. G., Wang, X. K., Wang, J. Q., Long, Q. Q., & Yin, L. J. (2023b). Picture fuzzy decision-making theories and methodologies: a systematic review. International Journal of Systems Science, 54(13), 2663–2675. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2023.2241961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J. J., Wang, J. Q., & Wu, X. H. (2019). Extended ELECTRE I method with multi-hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21(7), 2192–2203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00716-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J. J., Wang, J. Q., Wu, X. H., & Tian, C. (2017). Hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators based on the Archimedean t-norms and t-conorms. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(3), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0303-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Z., Xu, Z., & Wang, H. (2017). Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method. Information Sciences, 388-389, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Ganie, A. H. (2021a). Applications of picture fuzzy similarity measures in pattern recognition, clustering, and MADM. Expert Systems with Applications, 168(114264).
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Ganie, A. H. (2021b). A picture fuzzy similarity measure based on direct operations and novel multi-attribute decision-making method. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(15), 9199–9219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05725-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y. F., Fu, Q., Wang, Y. F., & Wang, X. D. (2019). Divergence-based cross entropy and uncertainty measures of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets with their application in decision making. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 84, 105703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, C., & Peng, J. J. (2019). An integrated picture fuzzy ANP-TODIM multi-criteria decision-making approach for tourism attraction recommendation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(2), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.11412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, C., Peng, J. J., Long, Q. Q., Wang, J. Q., & Goh, M. (2022a). Extended picture fuzzy MULTIMOORA method based on prospect theory for medical institution selection. Cognitive Computation, 14(4), 1446–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-022-10006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, C., Peng, J. J., Zhang, S., Wang, J. Q., & Goh, M. (2019). Weighted picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multi-criteria decision-making problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, C., Peng, J. J., Zhang, S., Wang, J. Q., & Goh, M. (2021). A sustainability evaluation framework for WET-PPP projects based on a picture fuzzy similarity-based VIKOR method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, C., Peng, J. J., Zhang, Z. Q., Wang, J. Q., & Goh, M. (2022b). An extended picture fuzzy MULTIMOORA method based on SchweizerSklar aggregation operators. Soft Computing, 26(7), 3435–3454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06690-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violeta, K., Edmundas, K. Z., & Zenonas, T. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Ma, X., Xu, Z., & Zhan, J. (2022). Regret theory-based three-way decision model in hesitant fuzzy environments and its application to medical decision. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(12), 536–15375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Rao, C. J., Goh, M., & Xiao, X. P. (2023). Risk assessment of coronary heart disease based on cloud-random forest. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(1), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10170-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Yao, X. N. (2022). VIKOR multi-attribute decision approach with the aid of a novel picture fuzzy distance. Operations Research and Management Science, 31(5), 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, G. W. (2016). Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems. Journal of Business Economics & Management, 17(4), 491–502.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. S. (2002). Interactive multi-attribute decision-making method based on program achievement and comprehensiveness. Control and Decision, 17(4), 354–338.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Lyu, L.W., Yang, Q.X., Liu, Y.K., An, W.L. (2023). Trust-based consensus reaching process for product design decision-making with heterogeneous information. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 56, 101934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.101934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, D., Sheng, L., & Xu, Z. (2022a). Analysis of evolutionary process in intuitionistic fuzzy set theory: A dynamic perspective. Information Sciences, 601, 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, D., Sheng, L., & Xu, Z. (2022b). Knowledge diffusion trajectories in the hesitant fuzzy domain in the past decade: a citation-based analysis. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(5), 2382–2396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01287-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C. (2020). Picture fuzzy normalized projection and extended VIKOR approach to software reliability assessment. Applied Soft Computing, 88, 106056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.106056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1968). Probability measures of fuzzy events. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 23(2), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(68)90078-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeljko, S., Dragan, P., Adis, P., & Prasenjit, C. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Wang, J. H., Zheng, D. L., Che, F., Shi, C., & Mao, H. B. (2019). Equipment material supplier selection decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and VIKOR. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 41(7), 1568–1575.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. L., Rao, C. J., Xiao, X. P., Hu, F. Y., & Goh, M. (2024). Prediction of demand for staple food and feed grain by a novel hybrid fractional discrete multivariate grey model. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 125, 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2023.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., Wang, Y. M., Zhang, K., Gao, J. Q., & Yang, L. H. (2022). A heterogeneous multi-attribute case retrieval method for emergency decision making based on bidirectional projection and TODIM. Expert Systems with Applications, 203, 117382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, K. Y., Yang, S. L., & Chen, W. (2014). An innovative orders-of-magnitude AHP approach of leading industries selection: case study of Jiangbei industrial clusters in China. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-014-5230-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar