Economics in Germany: About the Unequal Distribution of Power

References

• Barlösius, Eva. 2011. Pierre Bourdieu. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Bernau, Patrick. 2018. “Die Methode. So ist die Rangliste der Ökonomen entstanden.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ.net), August 31, 2018. Available at www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/f-a-z-oekonomenranking-2019-die-methode-16393654.html. Accessed January 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. The Social Structure of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butz, Alexander, and Klaus Wohlrabe. 2016. “Die Ökonomen-Rankings 2015 von Handelsblatt, Faz und RePEc: Methodik, Ergebnisse, Kritik und Vergleich.” IFO Working Paper Series, no. 212.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, David. 2000. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, David, Richard Holt, and Barkley Rosser, Jr. 2004. “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics.” Review of Political Economy 16 (4): 485–499.
   Google Scholar
• Deumelandt, Kathrin, and Arne Heise. 2014. “And the winner is… Von Rankings und Ökonomen-Hitparaden: einige provokante Überlegungen.” Momentum Quarterly-Zeitschrift für sozialen Fortschritt, 3 (1): 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dobusch, Leonhard, and Jakob Kapeller. 2012. “A Guide to Paradigmatic Self-Marginalization: Lessons for Post-Keynesian Economists.” Review of Political Economy 24 (3): 469–487.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, Sheila C. 2004. “Structured Pluralism.” Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3): 275–290.
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, William M. 1980. “Power: an Institutional Framework of Analysis.” Journal of Economic Issues 14 (4): 897–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlei, Mathias, and Justus Haucap. 2019. “Special Issue: Mainstream vs. Heterodoxe Ökonomik: Forschungsprogramme im Vergleich.” List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik 44 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Flickenschild, Michael, and Alexandre Afonso. 2019. “Networks of Economic Policy Expertise in Germany and the United States in the wake of the Great Recession.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (9): 1292–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, Marion. 2006. “The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics.” American Journal of Sociology 112 (1): 145–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodell, Rae. 1977. The Visible Scientists. Toronto: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Gräbner, Claudius, and Birte Strunk. 2020. “Pluralism in Economics: its Critiques and their Lessons.” Journal of Economic Methodology 27 (4): 311–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, Angela. 2015. Die Wissenschaftselite Deutschlands: Sozialprofil und Werdegänge zwischen 1945 und 2013. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Haucap, Justus, and Michael Mödl. 2013. “Zum Verhältnis von Spitzenforschung und Politikberatung: Eine empirische Analyse vor dem Hintergrund des Ökonomenstreits.” Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 14 (3–4): 346–378.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, Arne. 2014. “The Future of Economics in a Lakatos–Bourdieu Framework.” International Journal of Political Economy 43 (3): 70–93.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, Arne. 2020. “Comparing Economic Theories or: Pluralism in Economics and the Need for a Comparative Approach to Scientific Research Programmes.” Journal of Philosophical Economics 13 (2): 162–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, Arne, Henrike Sander, and Sebastian Thieme. 2017. Das Ende der Heterodoxie? Entwicklung der Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, Arne, and Sebastian Thieme. 2015. “Zur De-Pluralisierung der Wirtschaftswissenschaft nach 1970: Explorationen in einem wissenschaftlichen Macht-und Kampffeld.” Journal of Contextual Economics 135 (2): 155–187.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, Arne, and Sebastian Thieme. 2016. “The Short Rise and Long Fall of Heterodox Economics in Germany after the 1970s: Explorations in a Scientific Field of Power and Struggle.” Journal of Economic Issues 50 (4): 1105–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2000. “What is the Essence of Institutional Economics?.” Journal of Economic Issues 34 (2): 317–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2019. Is there a Future for Heterodox Economics? Institutions, Ideology and a Scientific Community. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kapeller, Jakob, Stephan Pühringer, and Christian Grimm. 2022. “Paradigms and Policies: the State of Economics in the German-speaking Countries.” Review of International Political Economy 29 (4): 1183–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapeller, Jakob, and Florian Springholz. 2016. “Heterodox Economic Directory.” Available at http://heterodoxnews.com/directory/journals.html. Accessed January 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2012. “Mathematical Modelling and Ideology in the Economics Academy: Competing Explanations of the Failings of the Modern Discipline?” Economic Thought 1 (1): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lebaron, Frédéric. 2001. “Economists and the Economic Order: The field of Economists and the Field of Power in France.” European Societies 3 (1): 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maeße, Jens. 2015. Eliteökonomen. Wissenschaft im Wandel der Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Maeße, Jens. 2017. “The Elitism Dispositif: Hierarchization, Discourses of Excellence and Organizational Change in European Economics.” Higher Education 73 (6): 909–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1998. The Rhetoric of Economics. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ötsch, Walter Otto, Stephan Pühringer, and Katrin Hirte. 2017. Netzwerke des Marktes: Ordoliberalismus als Politische Ökonomie. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, Theofanis, Panayotis G. Michaelides, and Dieter Bögenhold. 2020. “Veblen and Bourdieu on Social Reality and Order: Individuals and Institutions.” Journal of Economic Issues, 54 (3): 710–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pühringer, Stephan, and Karl M. Beyer. 2021. “Who are the Economists Germany Listens To? The Social Structure of Influential German Economists. “In Power and Influence of Economists: Contributions to the Social Studies of Economics, edited by Jens Maeße, Stephan Pühringer, Thierry Rossier, and Pierre Benz, 147–168. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramazzotti, Paolo. 2022. “Heterodoxy, the Mainstream and Policy.” Journal of Economic Issues 56 (1): 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinke, Rouven. 2021. “A Critical Note on the Scientific Conception of Economics: Claiming for a Methodological Pluralism.” Journal of Philosophical Economics 14 (2): 108–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossier, Thierry. 2020. “Accumulation and Conversion of Capitals in Professorial Careers. The Importance of Scientific Reputation, Network Relations, and Internationality in Economics and Business Studies.” Higher Education 80 (6): 1061–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossier, Thierry, and Pierre Benz. 2021. “Forms of Social Capital in Economics: The Importance of Heteronomous Networks in the Swiss Field of Economists (1980–2000). “In Power and Influence of Economists: Contributions to the Social Studies of Economics, edited by Jens Maeße, Stephan Pühringer, Thierry Rossier, and Pierre Benz, 227–247. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salas-Porras, Alejandra, and Georgina Murray. 2017. Think Tanks and Global Politics: Key Spaces in the Structure of Power. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian. 2018. “Struggling over Crisis. Discoursive Positionings and Academic Positions in the Field of German-Speaking Economists.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 43 (3): 147–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang, Tobias Thomas, and Gert G. Wagner. 2019. “Gleich und Gleich Gesellt Sich Gern? Eine Netzwerkanalyse von Politikberatenden Wissenschaftlern.” Wirtschaftsdienst 99 (4): 278–285.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. 2012. Personal an Hochschulen. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. 2019. Personal an Hochschulen. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Theine, Hendrik. 2021. “Economists in Public Discourses: The Case of Wealth and Inheritance Taxation in the German Press. “In Power and Influence of Economists: Contributions to the Social Studies of Economics, edited by Jens Maeße, Stephan Pühringer, Thierry Rossier, and Pierre Benz, 188–206. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. 1994. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar