Analysis of Reverse Osmosis Separation Performances of Ethanol/Water Mixtures and Design of Ethanol Concentration Processes

References

• Aditiya HB, Mahlia TMI, Chong WT, Nur H, Sebayang AH. 2016. Second generation bioethanol production: a critical review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 66:631–653. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akamatsu K, Murakami T, Sugawara T, Kikuchi R, Nakao S. 2011. Stable equilibrium shift of methane steam reforming in membrane reactors with hydrogen-selective silica membranes. AIChE J. 57:1882–1888. doi: 10.1002/aic.12404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeli SD, Monteleone G, Giaconia A, Lemonidou AA. 2014. State-of-the-art catalysts for CH4 steam reforming at low temperature. Int J Hydro Ener. 39:1979–1997. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew TV, Mey L, Arena JT, Siefert NS, Mauter MS. 2017. Osmotically assisted reverse osmosis for high salinity brine treatment. Desalination. 421:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biasi LCK, Batista FRM, Zemp RJ, Romano ALR, Heinkenschloss M, Meirelles AJA. 2021. Parastillation and metastillation applied to bioethanol and neutral alcohol purification with energy savings. Chem Eng Process. 162:108334. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2021.108334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broda M, Kierzkowska AM, Baudouin D, Imtiaz Q, Copéret C, Müller CR. 2012. Sorbent-enhanced methane reforming over a Ni–Ca-based, bifunctional catalyst sorbent. ACS Catal. 2:1635–1646. doi: 10.1021/cs300247g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Yip NY. 2018. Unlocking high-salinity desalination with cascading osmotically mediated reverse osmosis: energy and operating pressure analysis. Environ Sci Technol. 52:2242–2250. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiao YH, Mai Z, Hung WS, Matsuyama H. 2023. Osmotically assisted solvent reverse osmosis membrane for dewatering of aqueous ethanol solution. J Membr Sci. 672:121434. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong TH, Loo SL, Krantz WB. 2015. Energy-efficient reverse osmosis desalination process. J Membr Sci. 473:177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawood F, Anda M, Shafiullah GM. 2020. Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. Int J Hydro Ener. 45:3847–3869. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059.
   Google Scholar
• Dharupaneedi SP, Anjanapura RV, Han JM, Aminabhavi TM. 2014. Functionalized graphene sheets embedded in chitosan nanocomposite membranes for ethanol and isopropanol dehydration via pervaporation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 53:14474–14484. doi: 10.1021/ie502751h.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson HJE. 1925. CCCXCVII.—the partial pressures of aqueous ethyl alcohol. J Chem Soc Trans. 127:2866–2873. doi: 10.1039/CT9252702866.
   Google Scholar
• Ghungrud SA, Vaidya PD. 2020. Improved hydrogen production from sorption-enhanced steam reforming of ethanol (SESRE) using multifunctional materials of cobalt catalyst and Mg-, Ce-, and Zr-modified CaO sorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res. 59:693–703. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Zhang G, Wu W, Ji S, Qin Z, Liu Z. 2010. Dynamically formed inner skin hollow fiber polydimethylsiloxane/polysulfone composite membrane for alcohol permselective pervaporation. Chem Eng J. 158:558–565. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Song W. 2019. The growing U.S. bioeconomy: drivers, development and constraints. N Biotechnol. 49:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2018.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall DJ, Mash CJ, Penberton RC. 1979. Vapor–liquid equilibrium for the systems water + methanol, water + ethanol, methanol + ethanol and water + methanol + ethanol. NPL Rep Chem. 95:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jia H, Xu H, Sheng X, Yang X, Shen W, Goldbach A. 2020. High-temperature ethanol steam reforming in PdCu membrane reactor. J Membr Sci. 605:118083. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamtsikakis A, McBride S, Zoppe JO, Weder C. 2021. Cellulose nanofiber nanocomposite pervaporation membranes for ethanol recovery. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 4:568–579. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.0c02881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka T, Tsuru T, Nakao S, Kimura S. 1991a. Permeation equations developed for prediction of membrane performance in pervaporation, vapor permeation and reverse osmosis based on the solution-diffusion model. J Chem Eng Japan. 24:326–333. doi: 10.1252/jcej.24.326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka T, Tsuru T, Nakao S, Kimura S. 1991b. Membrane transport properties of pervaporation and vapor permeation in ethanol–water system using polyacrylonitrile and cellulose acetate membranes. J Chem Eng Japan. 24:334–339. doi: 10.1252/jcej.24.334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaymak DB. 2019. Design and control of an alternative bioethanol purification process via reactive distillation from fermentation broth. Ind Eng Chem Res. 58:1675–1685. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedem O, Katchalsky A. 1958. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 27:229–246. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(58)90330-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura S, Sourirajan S. 1967. Analysis of data in reverse osmosis with porous cellulose acetate membranes used. AIChE J. 13:497–503. doi: 10.1002/aic.690130319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss AA, Suszwalak DJPC. 2012. Enhanced bioethanol dehydration by extractive and azeotropic distillation in dividing-wall columns. Sep Purif Technol. 86:70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumakiri I, Tsuru T, Nakao S, Kimura S. 2000. Reverse osmosis performance at high pressure with high water recovery. J Chem Eng Japan. 33:414–419. doi: 10.1252/jcej.33.414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Dong G, Tsuru T, Matsuyama H. 2021. Organic solvent reverse osmosis membranes for organic liquid mixture separation: a review. J Membr Sci. 620:118882. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes ML, de Lima Paulillo SC, Godoy A, Cherubin RA, Lorenzi MS, Giometti HC, Bernardino CD, de Amorim Neto HB, de Amorim HV. 2016. Ethanol production in Brazil: a bridge between science and industry. Braz J Microbiol. 47(Suppl 1):64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moriyama N, Nagasawa H, Kanezashi M, Tsuru T. 2022. Water permeation in gas and liquid phases through organosilica membranes: a unified theory of reverse osmosis, pervaporation, and vapor permeation. Chem Eng Sci. 263:118083. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradov N. 2017. Low to near-zero CO2 production of hydrogen from fossil fuels: status and perspectives. Int J Hydro Ener. 42:14058–14088. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni M, Leung DYC, Leung MKH. 2007. A review on reforming bio-ethanol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydro Ener. 32:3238–3247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolskaya AV. 1946. The vapor pressure of ternary stratified systems. Aqueous alcohol solutions of potassium carbonate and magnesium sulfate. Zh Fiz Khim. 20:421–431
   Google Scholar
• Peters CD, Hankins NP. 2019. Osmotically assisted reverse osmosis (OARO): five approaches to dewatering saline brines using pressure-driven membrane processes. Desalination. 458:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phutela RC, Kooner ZS, Fenby DV. 1979. Vapour pressure study of deuterium exchange reactions in water-ethanol systems: equilibrium constant determination. Aust J Chem. 32:2353–2359. doi: 10.1071/CH9792353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renon H, Prausnitz JM. 1968. Local compositions in thermodynamic excess functions for liquid mixtures. AIChE J. 14:135–144. doi: 10.1002/aic.690140124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soccol CR, de Souza Vandenberghe LP, Medeiros ABP, Karp SG, Buckeridge M, Ramos LP, Pitarelo AP, Ferreira-Leitão V, Gottschalk JMF, Ferrara MA, et al. 2010. Bioethanol from lignocelluloses: status and perspectives in Brazil. Bioresour Technol. 101:4820–4825. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togo N, Nakagawa K, Shintani T, Yoshioka T, Takahashi T, Kamio E, Matsuyama H. 2019. Osmotically assisted reverse osmosis utilizing hollow fiber membrane module for concentration process. Ind Eng Chem Res. 58:6721–6729. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Deshmukh A, Du Y, Elimelech M. 2020. Minimal and zero liquid discharge with reverse osmosis using low-salt-rejection membranes. Water Res. 170:115317. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Feng D, Chen Y, He D, Elimelech M. 2021. Comparison of energy consumption of osmotically assisted reverse osmosis and low-salt-rejection reverse osmosis for brine management. Environ Sci Technol. 55:10714–10723. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Terano T, Nishi Y, Tokunaga J. 1995. Vapor-liquid equilibria for methanol + ethanol + calcium chloride, + ammonium iodide, and + sodium iodide at 298.15 K. J Chem Eng Data. 40:472–477. doi: 10.1021/je00018a026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan X, Lu J, Tan T, Li J. 2012. Mixed matrix membranes with HF acid etched ZSM-5 for ethanol/water separation: preparation and pervaporation performance. Appl Surf Sci. 259:547–556. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Shi R, Jin W. 2014. Novel organic–inorganic pervaporation membrane with a superhydrophobic surface for the separation of ethanol from an aqueous solution. Sep Purif Technol. 127:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar