New Approaches for Prediction of Flow Regime Boundaries and Overall Gas Holdups in a Bubble Column Operated with Aqueous Solutions of 2-Pentanol

References

• Bakshi BR, Zhong H, Jiang P, Fan L-S. 1995. Analysis of flow in gas–liquid bubble columns using multi-resolution methods. Trans Inst Chem Eng A Chem Eng Res Des. 73:608–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besagni G, Inzoli F, De Guido G, Pellegrini LA. 2016. Experimental investigation on the influence of ethanol on bubble column hydrodynamics. Chem Eng Res Des. 112:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briens LA, Briens CL, Hay J, Hudson C, Margaritis A. 1997. Hurst’s analysis to detect minimum fluidization and gas maldistribution in fluidized beds. AIChE J. 43:1904–1908. doi: 10.1002/aic.690430725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckwer W, Graeser U, Langemann H, Serpemen Y. 1973. Zones of different mixing in the liquid phase of bubble columns. Chem Eng Sci. 28:1223–1225. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(73)85031-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drahoš J, Bradka F, Punčochář M. 1992. Fractal behaviour of pressure fluctuations in a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci. 47:4069–4075. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(92)85158-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drahoš J, Zahradník J, Punčochář M, Fialová M, Bradka F. 1991. Effect of operating conditions of the characteristics of pressure fluctuations in a bubble column. Chem Eng Process. 29:107–115. doi: 10.1016/0255-2701(91)87019-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourich B, Vial C, Azher NE, Soulami MB, Ziyad M. 2008. Influence of hydrodynamics and probe response on oxygen mass transfer measurements in a high aspect ratio bubble column reactor: effect of the coalescence behavior of the liquid phase. Biochem Eng J. 39:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2007.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im H, Park J, Lee JW. 2019. Prediction of main regime transition with variations of gas and liquid phases in a bubble column. ACS Omega. 4:1329–1343. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson F, Zijerveld RC, Schouten JC, Van den Bleek CM, Leckner B. 2000. Characterization of fluidization regimes by time series analysis of pressure fluctuations. Int J Multiphase Flow. 26:663–715. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(99)00028-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan U, Schumpe A. 2001. The gas density effect on mass transfer in bubble columns with organic liquids. Chem Eng Sci. 56:6267–6272. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00255-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazakis NA, Mouza AA, Paras SV. 2008. Coalescence during bubble formation at two neighbouring pores: an experimental study in microscopic scale. Chem Eng Sci. 63:5160–5178. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemoun A, Ong BC, Gupta P, Al-Dahhan MH, Dudukovic MP. 2001. Gas holdup in bubble columns at elevated pressure via computed tomography. Int J Multiphase Flow. 27:929–946. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(00)00037-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna R, Ellenberger J. 1996. Gas holdup in bubble column reactors operating in the churn-turbulent flow regime. AIChE J. 42:2627–2634. doi: 10.1002/aic.690420923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard C, Ferrasse J-H, Boutin O, Lefevre S, Viand A. 2015. Bubble column reactors for high pressures and high temperatures operation. Chem Eng Res Des. 100:391–421. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2015.05.013.
   Google Scholar
• Letzel HM, Schouten JC, Krishna R, Van den Bleek CM. 1997. Characterization of regimes and regime transitions in bubble columns by chaos analysis of pressure signals. Chem Eng Sci. 52:4447–4459. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00290-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin T-J, Juang R-C, Chen Y-C, Chen C-C. 2001. Predictions of flow transitions in a bubble column by chaotic time series analysis of pressure fluctuation signals. Chem Eng Sci. 56:1057–1065. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00322-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luewisuthichat W, Tsutsumi A, Yoshida K. 1995. Fractal analysis of particle trajectories in three-phase systems. Trans Inst Chem Eng A Chem Eng Res Des. 73:222–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luewisuthichat W, Tsutsumi A, Yoshida K. 1996. Deterministic chaos analysis of particle dynamics in three-phase systems. J Chem Eng Japan. 29:675–682. doi: 10.1252/jcej.29.675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maucci E, Briens CL, Martinuzzi RJ, Wild G. 1999. Detection and characterization of piston flow regime in three-phase fluidized beds. Powder Technol. 103:243–259. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00035-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medjiade WT, Alvaro AR, Schumpe A. 2017. Flow regime transitions in a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci. 170:263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersmann A. 1978. Design and scale-up of bubble and spray columns. German Chem Eng. 1:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Katerla J, Basiak E. 2022. Novel hybrid methods for identifying the main transition velocities in various bubble columns. J Chem Eng Japan. 55:201–216. doi: 10.1252/jcej.21we082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Kumar SB, Dudukovic MP. 2003. Flow regime identification in a bubble column based on both Kolmogorov entropy and quality of mixedness derived from CARPT data. Can J Chem Eng. 81:367–374. doi: 10.1002/cjce.5450810305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Marchini S, Schubert M, Hlawitschka MW, Hampel U. 2023. Novel identifier of transitions in bubble columns operated with water and aqueous alcohol solutions. Chem Eng Technol. 46:1782–1790. doi: 10.1002/ceat.202300095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Ookawara S, Ogawa K. 1999. A fundamental approach to bubble column scale-up based on quality of mixedness. J Chem Eng Japan. 32:431–439. doi: 10.1252/jcej.32.431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Schumpe A. 2008. A new approach for the prediction of gas holdup in bubble columns operated under various pressures in the homogeneous regime. J Chem Eng Japan. 41:744–755. doi: 10.1252/jcej.08we005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Shaikh A, Al-Dahhan M. 2011. Flow regime identification in a bubble column via nuclear gauge densitometry and chaos analysis. Chem Eng Technol. 34:225–233. doi: 10.1002/ceat.201000308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Shaikh A, Al-Dahhan MH. 2006. Flow regime identification in a bubble column based on both statistical and chaotic parameters applied to computed tomography data. Chem Eng Technol. 29:1054–1060. doi: 10.1002/ceat.200600162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Shaikh A. 2013. A new method for identification of the main transition velocities in multiphase reactors based on information entropy theory. Chem Eng Sci. 100:2–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.03.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S, Top Y, Hlawitschka M, Schubert M, Bart H-J. 2020. Identification of the regime boundaries in bubble columns based on the degree of randomness into the signals. Can J Chem Eng. 98:1607–1621. doi: 10.1002/cjce.23719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeltchev S. 2015. New methods for flow regime identification in bubble columns and fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci. 137:436–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranade VV. 1992. Flow in bubble columns: some numerical experiments. Chem Eng Sci. 47:1857–1869. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(92)80304-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly IG, Scott DS, De Bruijn TJW, MacIntyre D. 1994. The role of gas phase momentum in determining gas holdup and hydrodynamic flow regimes in bubble column operations. Can J Chem Eng. 72:3–12. doi: 10.1002/cjce.5450720102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah YT, Kelkar BG, Godbole SP, Deckwer W-D. 1982. Design parameters estimations for bubble column reactors. AIChE J. 28:353–379. doi: 10.1002/aic.690280302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotelo JL, Benitez FJ, Beltran-Heredia J, Rodriguez C. 1994. Gas holdup and mass transfer coefficients in bubble columns. 1. Porous plate diffusers. Int Chem Eng. 34:82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Vial C, Camarasa E, Poncin S, Wild G, Midoux N, Bouillard J. 2000. Study of hydrodynamic behaviour in bubble columns and external loop airlift reactors through analysis of pressure fluctuations. Chem Eng Sci. 55:2957–2973. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00551-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson PM, Spek AP, Van Dierendonck LL. 1992. Design parameters estimation for scale-up of high-pressure bubble columns. AIChE J. 38:544–554. doi: 10.1002/aic.690380408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Al-Dahhan MH. 2001. Prediction of axial liquid velocity profile in a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci. 56:1127–1130. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00330-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar