Identification of Main Reaction Path of Soot Formation from Primary Pyrolysis Products in Coal Gasification

References

• Akaotsu S, Matsushita Y, Aoki H, Malalasekera W. 2020. Analysis of flame structure using detailed chemistry and applicability of flamelet/progress variable model in the laminar counter-flow diffusion flames of pulverized coals. Adv Powder Technol. 31:1302–1322. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2019.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano T. 2012. Progress in Japanese air-blown IGCC demonstration project update. Paper presented at: Coal Gasification Symposium, Jeju, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher TH, Kerstein AR, Pugmire RJ, Solum MS, Grant DM. 1992. A chemical percolation model for devolatilization: summary. Sandia Technical Report, Report No: SAND92-8207.
   Google Scholar
• Grant DM, Pugmire RJ, Fletcher TH, Kerstein AR. 1989. Chemical model of coal devolatilization using percolation lattice statistics. Energy Fuels. 3:175–186. doi: 10.1021/ef00014a011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosokai S, Suzuki Y, Matsuoka K, Kuramoto K. 2022. In situ coal tar reforming with char and its reaction model considering pore consumption. Energy Fuels. 36:6119–6129. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c00584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Yuan W, Li W, Yang J, Zhou Z, Zhao L, Li Y, Qi F. 2023. Combustion chemistry of aromatic hydrocarbons. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 96:101076. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajitani S, Hara S, Matsuda H. 2002. Gasification rate analysis of coal char with a pressurized drop tube furnace. Fuel. 81:539–546. doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00149-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawase M, Goshima H, Miura K. 2006. Reduced elementary reaction model of the propane pyrolysis. Stud Surf Sci Cat. 159:217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kousoku A, Norinaga K, Miura K. 2014. Extended detailed chemical kinetic model for benzene pyrolysis with new reaction pathways including oligomer formation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 53:7956–7964. doi: 10.1021/ie4044218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Choi C, Fukomoto K, Machida H, Norinaga K. 2023. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and soot formations under different gasifying agents: detailed chemical kinetic analysis of a two-stage entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel. 343:127876. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu T, Law CK. 2005. A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction. Proc Combust Inst. 30:1333–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanikashani S, Vandewalle LA, De Meester S, De Wilde J, Van Geem KM. 2022. Multi-scale modeling of plastic waste gasification: opportunities and challenges. Materials. 15:4215. doi: 10.3390/ma15124215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JW, Salamanca M, Kraft M. 2022. Soot inception: carbonaceous nanoparticle formation in flames. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 88:100956. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miura K, Hashimoto K, Silveston PL. 1989. Factors affecting the reactivity of coal chars during gasification, and indices representing reactivity. Fuel. 68:1461–1475. doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(89)90046-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miura K, Nakagawa H, Nakai S, Kajitani S. 2004. Analysis of gasification reaction of coke formed using a miniature tubing-bomb reactor and a pressurized drop tube furnace at high pressure and high temperature. Chem Eng Sci. 59:5261–5268. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyoshi A. 2005. Development of an auto-generation system for detailed kinetic model of combustion. Trans Soc Automot Eng Jpn. 36:35–40 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer KE, Sung C-J, Raju MP. 2010. Skeletal mechanism generation for surrogate fuels using directed relation graph with error propagation and sensitivity analysis. Combust. Flame. 157:1760–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niksa S. 2017. A reaction mechanism for tar decomposition at moderate temperatures with any coal type. Fuel. 193:467–476. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oki Y, Hamada H, Kobayashi M, Nakao Y, Hara S. 2016. Development of high-efficiency oxy-fuel IGCC system. Mech Eng J. 3:16–00351.
   Google Scholar
• Okumura Y. 2021. Quantitative analysis of primary tar yields volatilized from biomass (Effect of heating rate and biomass type on tar components). J Therm Sci Technol. 16:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter H, Howard JB. 2002. Formation and consumption of single-ring aromatic hydrocarbons and their precursors in premixed acetylene, ethylene and benzene flames. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 4:2038–2055. doi: 10.1039/b110089k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts DG, Harris DJ. 2007. Char gasification in mixtures of CO2 and H2O: competition and inhibition. Fuel. 86:2672–2678. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakurai Y, Yamamoto S, Kudo S, Norinaga K, Hayashi JI. 2013. Conversion characteristics of aromatic hydrocarbons in simulated gaseous atmospheres in reducing section of two-stage entrained-flow coal gasifier in air- and O2/CO2-blown modes. Energy Fuels. 27:1974–1981. doi: 10.1021/ef301658d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takarada T, Tamai Y, Tomita A. 1985. Reactivities of 34 coals under steam gasification. Fuel. 64:1438–1442. doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(85)90347-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thimthong N, Appari S, Tanaka R, Iwanaga K, Namioka T, Kudo S, Hayashi JI, Norinaga K. 2015. Numerical study on the steam reforming of biomass tar using a detailed chemical kinetic model. J Jpn Inst Energy. 94:794–804. doi: 10.3775/jie.94.794.
   Google Scholar
• Umemoto S, Kajitani S, Hara S. 2013. Modeling of coal char gasification in coexistence of CO2 and H2O considering sharing of active sites. Fuel. 103:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.11.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umemoto S, Kajitani S, Hara S, Kawase M. 2016. Proposal of a new soot quantification method and investigation of soot formation behavior in coal gasification. Fuel. 167:280–287. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umemoto S, Kajitani S, Kawase M. 2023. Modification of extended chemical percolation devolatilization model for application to low-rank coals. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 175:106168. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2023.106168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umemoto S, Kajitani S, Kidoguchi K, Oki Y. 2021. Proposal of poly-generation system utilizing various fuels for carbon recycling. Paper presented at: 7th International Symposium on Gasification and Its Application, Nancy, France.
   Google Scholar
• Umemoto S, Kajitani S, Miura K, Watanabe H, Kawase M. 2017. Extension of the chemical percolation devolatilization model for predicting formation of tar compounds as soot precursor in coal gasification. Fuel Process Technol. 159:256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.01.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Otaka M. 2006. Numerical simulation of coal gasification in entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel. 85:1935–1943. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Tanno K, Umetsu H, Umemoto S. 2015. Modeling and simulation of coal gasification on an entrained flow coal gasifier with a recycled CO2 injection. Fuel. 142:250–259. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Zhou D, Yu L, Qian Y, Lu X. 2022. Construction of a skeletal multi-component diesel surrogate model by integrating chemical lumping and genetic algorithm. Fuel. 313:122711. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar