Breaking Boundaries: Innovations in Two- and Three-Dimensional Metal-Organic Framework (MOF)-Based Mixed-Matrix Membranes for Effective Post-Combustion CO₂ Capture

References

• Akpasi SO, Yusuf MI. 2022. Review of carbon capture and methane production from carbon dioxide. Atmosphere. 13:1958. doi: 10.3390/atmos13121958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arif A. 2016. Preparation and optimization of a membrane for 3rd generation solvent membrane contactor [Master’s thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology]. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2417602/14556_FULLTEXT.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Bae T-H, Long JR. 2013. CO2/N2 separations with mixed-matrix membranes containing Mg2(dobdc) nanocrystals. Energy Environ Sci. 6:3565–3569. doi: 10.1039/c3ee42394h.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban Y, Li Z, Li Y, Peng Y, Jin H, Jiao W, Guo A, Wang P, Yang Q, Zhong C, et al. 2015. Confinement of ionic liquids in nanocages: tailoring the molecular sieving properties of ZIF‐8 for membrane‐based CO2 capture. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 54:15483–15487. doi: 10.1002/anie.201505508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bano S, Tariq SR, Anjum T, Najam M, Usman M, Yasin M, Shafi H, Khan AL. 2022. Development of highly permselective mixed matrix membranes comprising of polyimide and Ln-MOF for CO2 capture. Chemosphere. 307:136051. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barooah M, Kundu S, Kumar S, Katare A, Borgohain R, Uppaluri RV, Kundu LM, Mandal B. 2024. New generation mixed matrix membrane for CO2 separation: transition from binary to quaternary mixed matrix membrane. Chemosphere. 354:141653. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141653.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basu S, Cano-Odena A, Vankelecom IF. 2011. MOF-containing mixed-matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 binary gas mixture separations. Sep Purif Technol. 81:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.06.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzaqui M, Pillai RS, Sabetghadam A, Benoit V, Normand P, Marrot J, Menguy N, Montero D, Shepard W, Tissot A, et al. 2017. Revisiting the aluminum trimesate-based MOF (MIL-96): from structure determination to the processing of mixed matrix membranes for CO2 capture. Chem Mater. 29:10326–10338. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carja I-D, Tavares SR, Shekhah O, Ozcan A, Semino R, Kale VS, Eddaoudi M, Maurin G. 2021. Insights into the enhancement of MOF/polymer adhesion in mixed-matrix membranes via polymer functionalization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 13:29041–29047. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c03859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casado-Coterillo C, Fernández-Barquín A, Zornoza B, Téllez C, Coronas J, Irabien Á. 2015. Synthesis and characterisation of MOF/ionic liquid/chitosan mixed matrix membranes for CO2/N2 separation. RSC Adv. 5:102350–102361. doi: 10.1039/C5RA19331A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabanon E, Bounaceur R, Castel C, Rode S, Roizard D, Favre E. 2015. Pushing the limits of intensified CO2 post-combustion capture by gas–liquid absorption through a membrane contactor. Chem Eng Proc. 91:7–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Yang C, Hou W, Liu N, Xia R, Chen Z, Zhang H, Liu J. 2023. Carbon nanotubes grown on ZIF-L (Zn@Co) surface improved CO2 permeability of mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci. 670:121356. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Tavares SR, Doherty CM, Ying Y, Sarnello E, Maurin G, Hill MR, Li T, Zhao D. 2018. Enhanced polymer crystallinity in mixed-matrix membranes induced by metal–organic framework nanosheets for efficient CO2 capture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 10:43095–43103. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b16386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Wang X, Jia C, Wang Y, Zhai L, Wang Q, Zhao D. 2017. Ultrathin mixed matrix membranes containing two-dimensional metal-organic framework nanosheets for efficient CO2/CH4 separation. J Membr Sci. 539:213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi WS, Sundell BJ, Zhang K, Harrigan DJ, Hayden SC, Smith ZP. 2019. Mixed‐matrix membranes formed from multi‐dimensional metal–organic frameworks for enhanced gas transport and plasticization resistance. ChemSusChem. 12:2355–2360. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201900623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi HL, Jeong Y, Lee H, Bae T-H. 2024. High-performance mixed-matrix membranes using a zeolite@MOF core–shell structure synthesized via ion-exchange-induced crystallization and post-synthetic conversion. JACS Au. 4:253–262. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00680.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chuah CY, Goh K, Bae T-H. 2017. Hierarchically structured HKUST-1 nanocrystals for enhanced SF6 capture and recovery. J Phys Chem C. 121:6748–6755. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Goh K, Bae T-H. 2021. Enhanced performance of carbon molecular sieve membranes incorporating zeolite nanocrystals for air separation. Membranes. 11:489. doi: 10.3390/membranes11070489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Goh K, Yang Y, Gong H, Li W, Karahan HE, Guiver MD, Wang R, Bae T-H. 2018. Harnessing filler materials for enhancing biogas separation membranes. Chem Rev. 118:8655–8769. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Jiang X, Goh K, Wang R. 2021. Recent progress in mixed-matrix membranes for hydrogen separation. Membranes. 11:666. doi: 10.3390/membranes11090666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chuah CY, Kim K, Lee J, Koh D-Y, Bae T-H. 2019. CO2 absorption using membrane contactors: recent progress and future perspective. Ind Eng Chem Res. 59:6773–6794. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Lee J, Bao Y, Song J, Bae T-H. 2021. High-performance porous carbon-zeolite mixed-matrix membranes for CO2/N2 separation. J Membr Sci. 622:119031. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.119031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Lee J, Song J, Bae T-H. 2020. CO2/N2 separation properties of polyimide-based mixed-matrix membranes comprising UiO-66 with various functionalities. Membranes. 10:154. doi: 10.3390/membranes10070154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Lee Y, Bae T-H. 2021. Potential of adsorbents and membranes for SF6 capture and recovery: a review. Chem Eng J. 404:126577. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Li W, Samarasinghe S, Sethunga G, Bae T-H. 2019. Enhancing the CO2 separation performance of polymer membranes via the incorporation of amine-functionalized HKUST-1 nanocrystals. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 290:109680. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Li W, Yang Y, Bae T-H. 2020. Evaluation of porous adsorbents for CO2 capture under humid conditions: the importance of recyclability. Chem Eng J Adv. 3:100021. doi: 10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100021.
   Google Scholar
• Chuah CY, Samarasinghe SASC, Li W, Goh K, Bae T-H. 2020. Leveraging nanocrystal HKUST-1 in mixed-matrix membranes for ethylene/ethane separation. Membranes. 10:74. doi: 10.3390/membranes10040074.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chuah CY. 2019. Microporous materials with tailored structural properties for enhanced gas separation, school of chemical and biomedical engineering. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
   Google Scholar
• Chui SS-Y, Lo SM-F, Charmant JP, Orpen AG, Williams ID. 1999. A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [Cu3 (TMA)2(H2O)3]. Science. 283:1148–1150. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5405.1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comesaña-Gándara B, Chen J, Bezzu CG, Carta M, Rose I, Ferrari M-C, Esposito E, Fuoco A, Jansen JC, McKeown NB. 2019. Redefining the Robeson upper bounds for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separations using a series of ultrapermeable benzotriptycene-based polymers of intrinsic microporosity. Energy Environ Sci. 12:2733–2740. doi: 10.1039/C9EE01384A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J, Dai Z, Hou J, Deng L. 2020. Morphologically tunable MOF nanosheets in mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation. Chem Mater. 32:4174–4184. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding R, Dai Y, Zheng W, Li X, Yan X, Liu Y, Ruan X, Li S, Yang X, Yang K, et al. 2021. Vesicles-shaped MOF-based mixed matrix membranes with intensified interfacial affinity and CO2 transport freeway. Chem Eng J. 414:128807. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du X, Feng S, Luo J, Zhuang Y, Song W, Li X, Wan Y. 2023. Pebax mixed matrix membrane with bimetallic CeZr-MOFs to enhance CO2 separation. Sep Purif Technol. 322:124251. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutcher B, Fan M, Russell AG. 2015. Amine-based CO2 capture technology development from the beginning of 2013—a review. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 7:2137–2148. doi: 10.1021/am507465f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L, Kang Z, Shen Y, Wang S, Zhao H, Sun H, Hu X, Sun H, Wang R, Sun D. 2018. Mixed matrix membranes based on metal–organic frameworks with tunable pore size for CO2 separation. Cryst Growth Des. 18:4365–4371. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farha OK, Eryazici I, Jeong NC, Hauser BG, Wilmer CE, Sarjeant AA, Snurr RQ, Nguyen ST, Yazaydın A, Hupp JT. 2012. Metal–organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: is the sky the limit? J Am Chem Soc. 134:15016–15021. doi: 10.1021/ja3055639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Bu M, Pang J, Fan W, Fan L, Zhao H, Yang G, Guo H, Kong G, Sun H, et al. 2020. Hydrothermal stable ZIF-67 nanosheets via morphology regulation strategy to construct mixed-matrix membrane for gas separation. J Membr Sci. 593:117404. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng X, Qin Z, Lai Q, Zhang Z, Shao Z-W, Tang W, Wu W, Dai Z, Liu C. 2023. Mixed-matrix membranes based on novel hydroxamate metal–organic frameworks with two-dimensional layers for CO2/N2 separation. Sep Purif Technol. 305:122476. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman B, Hao P, Baker R, Kniep J, Chen E, Ding J, Zhang Y, Rochelle GT. 2014. Hybrid membrane-absorption CO2 capture process. Energy Proc. 63:605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.065.
   Google Scholar
• Ghalei B, Sakurai K, Kinoshita Y, Wakimoto K, Isfahani AP, Song Q, Doitomi K, Furukawa S, Hirao H, Kusuda H, et al. 2017. Enhanced selectivity in mixed matrix membranes for CO2 capture through efficient dispersion of amine-functionalized MOF nanoparticles. Nat Energy. 2:1–9. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami M, Van Assche TRC, Denayer JFM. 2023. Temperature vacuum swing, a combined adsorption cycle for carbon capture. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 39:100891. doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2022.100891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh SH, Lau HS, Yong WF. 2022. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)-based mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for gas separation: a review on advanced materials in harsh environmental applications. Small. 18:e2107536. doi: 10.1002/smll.202107536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Chuah CY, Yang Y, Bae T-H. 2018. High performance composite membranes comprising Zn (pyrz)2(SiF6) nanocrystals for CO2/CH4 separation. J Ind Eng Chem. 60:279–285. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto K, Okabe H, Shimizu S, Onoda M, Fujioka Y. 2009. Evaluation method of novel absorbents for CO2 capture. Energy Proc. 1:1083–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.143.
   Google Scholar
• Guo F, Li D, Ding R, Gao J, Ruan X, Jiang X, He G, Xiao W. 2022. Constructing MOF-doped two-dimensional composite material ZIF-90@C3N4 mixed matrix membranes for CO2/N2 separation. Sep Purif Technol. 280:119803. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo F, Xiao W, Ma C, Ruan X, He G, Wang H, Yang Z, Jiang X. 2023. Constructing gas transmission pathways in two-dimensional composite material ZIF-8@ BNNS mixed-matrix membranes to enhance CO2/N2 separation performance. Membranes. 13:444. doi: 10.3390/membranes13040444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Qiao Z, Liu D, Zhong C. 2019. Mixed-matrix membranes for CO2 separation: role of the third component. J Mater Chem A. 7:24738–24759. doi: 10.1039/C9TA09012F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao L, Li P, Yang T, Chung T-S. 2013. Room temperature ionic liquid/ZIF-8 mixed-matrix membranes for natural gas sweetening and post-combustion CO2 capture. J Membr Sci. 436:221–231. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan MR, Paseta L, Malankowska M, Téllez C, Coronas J. 2022. Synthesis of ZIF‐94 from recycled mother liquors: study of the influence of its loading on postcombustion CO2 capture with Pebax based mixed matrix membranes. Adv Sustain Syst. 6:2100317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan NS, Jalil AA, Bahari MB, Khusnun NF, Aldeen EMS, Mim RS, Firmansyah ML, Rajendran S, Mukti RR, Andika R, et al. 2023. A comprehensive review on zeolite-based mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Chemosphere. 314:137709. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes AS, Ryan JM. 1982. Cryogenic distillative separation of acid gases from methane (U.S. Patent No. 4,318,723). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/a9/13/52/2b3de0b2aeee46/US4318723.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hossain I, Husna A, Chaemchuen S, Verpoort F, Kim T-H. 2020. Cross-linked mixed-matrix membranes using functionalized UiO-66- NH2 into PEG/PPG–PDMS-based rubbery polymer for efficient CO2 separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 12:57916–57931. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c18415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hou W, Cheng J, Hu L, Wu Y, Zhou J. 2023. Mixed matrix membranes based on NbOF52− anion-pillared porous MOFs for efficient CO2 separation. J Membr Sci. 693:122323. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.122323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husna A, Hossain I, Choi O, Lee SM, Kim TH. 2021. Efficient CO2 separation using a PIM‐PI‐functionalized UiO‐66 MOF incorporated mixed matrix membrane in a PIM‐PI‐1 polymer. Macromol Mater Eng. 306:2100298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husna A, Hossain I, Jeong I, Kim T-H. 2022. Mixed matrix membranes for efficient CO2 separation using an engineered UiO-66 MOF in a Pebax polymer. Polymers. 14:655. doi: 10.3390/polym14040655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia M, Feng Y, Qiu J, Zhang X-F, Yao J. 2019. Amine-functionalized MOFs@GO as filler in mixed matrix membrane for selective CO2 separation. Sep Purif Technol. 213:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamble AR, Patel CM, Murthy ZVP. 2021. A review on the recent advances in mixed matrix membranes for gas separation processes. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 145:111062. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang M, Kim T-H, Han HH, Min HJ, Bae Y-S, Kim JH. 2022. Submicron-thick, mixed-matrix membranes with metal-organic frameworks for CO2 separation: MIL-140C vs. UiO-67. J Membr Sci. 659:120788. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katare A, Kumar S, Kundu S, Sharma S, Kundu LM, Mandal B. 2023. Mixed matrix membranes for carbon capture and sequestration: challenges and scope. ACS Omega. 8:17511–17522. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c01666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katare A, Mandal B. 2023. Surface engineering of Zr BDC nanoparticles via conjugation with lysine to enhance the CO2/N2 separation performance of chitosan mixed matrix membranes under dry and humid conditions. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 6:4821–4833. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.3c00534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilpour R, Mumford K, Zhai H, Abbas A, Stevens G, Rubin ES. 2015. Membrane-based carbon capture from flue gas: a review. J Clean Prod. 103:286–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khdhayyer MR, Esposito E, Fuoco A, Monteleone M, Giorno L, Jansen JC, Attfield MP, Budd PM. 2017. Mixed matrix membranes based on UiO-66 MOFs in the polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1. Sep Purif Technol. 173:304–313. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.09.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim C, Ha Y, Choi M. 2023. Design of amine-containing nanoporous materials for postcombustion CO2 capture from engineering perspectives. Acc Chem Res. 56:2887–2897. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitaura R, Seki K, Akiyama G, Kitagawa S. 2003. Porous coordination‐polymer crystals with gated channels specific for supercritical gases. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 42:428–431. doi: 10.1002/anie.200390130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai Q, Chu Z-Q, Xiao X, Dai D, Song T, Luo T-Y, Tang W, Feng X, Zhang Z, Li T, et al. 2022. Two-dimensional Zr/Hf-hydroxamate metal–organic frameworks. Chem Commun. 58:3601–3604. doi: 10.1039/d2cc00213b.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee CS, Song E, Park JT, Kim JH. 2021. Ultrathin, highly permeable graphene oxide/zeolitic imidazole framework polymeric mixed-matrix composite membranes: engineering the CO2-philic pathway. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 9:11903–11915. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TH, Ozcan A, Park I, Fan D, Jang JK, Mileo PG, Yoo SY, Roh JS, Kang JH, Lee BK. 2021. Disclosing the role of defect‐engineered metal–organic frameworks in mixed matrix membranes for efficient CO2 separation: a joint experimental‐computational exploration. Adv Funct Mater. 31:2103973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Chuah CY, Lee J, Bae T-H. 2022. Effective functionalization of porous polymer fillers to enhance CO2/N2 separation performance of mixed-matrix membranes. J Membr Sci. 647:120309. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung DYC, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer MM. 2014. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 39:426–443. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Liu J, He X, Wang R, Tao W, Li Z. 2023. Covalent “Bridge-crosslinking” strategy constructs facilitated transport mixed matrix membranes for highly-efficient CO2 separation. J Membr Sci. 680:121755. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Qi A, Ling Y, Tao Y, Zhang Y-B, Li T. 2023. Establishing gas transport highways in MOF-based mixed matrix membranes. Sci Adv. 9:eadf5087. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf5087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Kujawski W, Knozowska K, Kujawa J. 2022. Pebax® 2533/PVDF thin film mixed matrix membranes containing MIL-101 (Fe)/GO composite for CO2 capture. RSC Adv. 12:29124–29136. doi: 10.1039/d2ra05095a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Kujawski W, Tonkonogovas A, Knozowska K, Kujawa J, Olewnik-Kruszkowska E, Pedišius N, Stankevičius A. 2022. Evaluation of CO2 separation performance with enhanced features of materials – Pebax® 2533 mixed matrix membranes containing ZIF-8-PEI@[P(3)HIm][Tf2N].Chem Eng Res Des. 181:195–208. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.03.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J-R, Kuppler RJ, Zhou H-C. 2009. Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev. 38:1477–1504. doi: 10.1039/b802426j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Ma C, Ye M, Guo X, Qiao Z, Zhong C. 2023. Mechanochemical synthesized amino-functionalized ultramicroporous ZIF based mixed-matrix membranes for CO2 separation. J Membr Sci. 680:121733. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Lian S, Song C. 2024. Imine-linked polymer derived N-doped microporous carbons in PEO-based mixed matrix membranes for enhanced CO2/N2 separation: a comparative study. J Membr Sci. 690:122203. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.122203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Pan Y, Peinemann K-V, Lai Z. 2013. Carbon dioxide selective mixed matrix composite membrane containing ZIF-7 nano-fillers. J Membr Sci. 425–426:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Chuah CY, Kwon S, Goh K, Wang R, Na K, Bae T-H. 2020. Nanosizing zeolite 5A fillers in mixed-matrix carbon molecular sieve membranes to improve gas separation performance. Chem Eng J Adv. 2:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100016.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Chuah CY, Yang Y, Bae T-H. 2018. Nanocomposites formed by in situ growth of NiDOBDC nanoparticles on graphene oxide sheets for enhanced CO2 and H2 storage. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 265:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.01.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Goh K, Chuah CY, Bae T-H. 2019. Mixed-matrix carbon molecular sieve membranes using hierarchical zeolite: a simple approach towards high CO2 permeability enhancements. J Membr Sci. 588:117220. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Samarasinghe SASC, Bae T-H. 2018. Enhancing CO2/CH4 separation performance and mechanical strength of mixed-matrix membrane via combined use of graphene oxide and ZIF-8. J Ind Eng Chem. 67:156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xin Q, Wu H, Guo R, Tian Z, Liu Y, Wang S, He G, Pan F, Jiang Z. 2014. Efficient CO2 capture by humidified polymer electrolyte membranes with tunable water state. Energy Environ Sci. 7:1489–1499. doi: 10.1039/c3ee43163k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin M, Zhang Y, Yan G, Yu P, Duan S, Chen H, Han J. 2023. Design and analysis of cryogenic CO2 separation from a CO2‐rich mixture. Energy Sci Eng. 11:2253–2266. doi: 10.1002/ese3.1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Yuan Z, Wang K, He X. 2023. Synergistic tuning mixed matrix membranes by Ag+-doping in UiO-66-NH2/polymers of intrinsic microporosity for remarkable CO2/N2 separation. J Membr Sci. 681:121775. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu N, Cheng J, Hou W, Yang C, Yang X, Zhou J. 2022. Bottom-up synthesis of two-dimensional composite via CuBDC-ns growth on multilayered MoS2 to boost CO2 permeability and selectivity in Pebax-based mixed matrix membranes. Sep Purif Technol. 282:120007. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loloei M, Kaliaguine S, Rodrigue D. 2021. Mixed matrix membranes based on NH2-MIL-53 (Al) and 6FDA-ODA polyimide for CO2 separation: effect of the processing route on improving MOF–polymer interfacial interaction. Sep Purif Technol. 270:118786. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luis P, Van Gerven T, Van der Bruggen B. 2012. Recent developments in membrane-based technologies for CO2 capture. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 38:419–448. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, He X, Tang S, Xu S, Qian Y, Zeng L, Tang K. 2022. Enhanced 2-D MOFs nanosheets/PIM-PMDA-OH mixed matrix membrane for efficient CO2 separation. J Environ Chem Eng. 10:107274. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, He X, Xu S, Yu Y, Zhang C, Meng J, Zeng L, Tang K. 2022. Enhanced 2-D MOFs nanosheets/PES-g-PEG mixed matrix membrane for efficient CO2 separation. Chem Eng Res Des. 180:79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madejski P, Chmiel K, Subramanian N, Kuś T. 2022. Methods and techniques for CO2 capture: review of potential solutions and applications in modern energy technologies. Energies. 15:887. doi: 10.3390/en15030887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleh MS, Raisi A. 2023. Heteroepitaxial growth of ZIF-67 nanoparticles on the ZIF-L (Zn) nanosheets for fabrication of Pebax mixed matrix membranes with highly efficient CO2 separation. Chemosphere. 344:140249. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason JA, McDonald TM, Bae T-H, Bachman JE, Sumida K, Dutton JJ, Kaye SS, Long JR. 2015. Application of a high-throughput analyzer in evaluating solid adsorbents for post-combustion carbon capture via multicomponent adsorption of CO2, N2, and H2O. J Am Chem Soc. 137:4787–4803. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson-Delmotte V. 2022. Global warming of 1.5 °C: an IPCC special report on impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miltner M, Makaruk A, Harasek M. 2017. Review on available biogas upgrading technologies and innovations towards advanced solutions. J Clean Prod. 161:1329–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molavi H, Shojaei A. 2019. Mixed-matrix composite membranes based on UiO-66-derived MOFs for CO2 separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 11:9448–9461. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b20869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafisi V, Hägg M-B. 2014. Development of dual layer of ZIF-8/PEBAX-2533 mixed matrix membrane for CO2 capture. J Membr Sci. 459:244–255. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastaj JF, Ambrożek B, Rudnicka J. 2006. Simulation studies of a vacuum and temperature swing adsorption process for the removal of VOC from waste air streams. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 33:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2005.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TH, Gong H, Lee SS, Bae TH. 2016. Amine‐appended hierarchical Ca‐A zeolite for enhancing CO2/CH4 selectivity of mixed‐matrix membranes. Chemphyschem. 17:3165–3169. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201600561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie L, Chuah CY, Bae TH, Lee JM. 2021. Graphene‐based advanced membrane applications in organic solvent nanofiltration. Adv Funct Mater. 31:2006949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KS, Ni Z, Côté AP, Choi JY, Huang R, Uribe-Romo FJ, Chae HK, O'Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. 2006. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103:10186–10191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602439103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park Y-J, Lee H, Choi HL, Tapia MC, Chuah CY, Bae T-H. 2023. Mixed-dimensional nanocomposites based on 2D materials for hydrogen storage and CO2 capture. NPJ 2D Mater Appl. 7:61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires J, Martins F, Alvim-Ferraz M, Simões M. 2011. Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: an overview. Chem Eng Res Des. 89:1446–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasetya N, Donose BC, Ladewig BP. 2018. A new and highly robust light-responsive Azo-UiO-66 for highly selective and low energy post-combustion CO2 capture and its application in a mixed matrix membrane for CO2/N2 separation. J Mater Chem A. 6:16390–16402. doi: 10.1039/C8TA03553A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu Y, Yang Z, Wee V, Wu Z, Jiang Z, Zhao D. 2022. Amino-functionalized NUS-8 nanosheets as fillers in PIM-1 mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separations. J Membr Sci. 641:119912. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Z, Feng X, Yin D, Xin B, Jin Z, Deng Y, Yang L, Yao L, Jiang W, Liu C, et al. 2023. Impact of humidity on the CO2/N2 separation performance of Pebax-MOF mixed matrix membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 62:14034–14046. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeson LM. 2008. The upper bound revisited. J Membr Sci. 320:390–400. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelle GT. 2009. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science. 325:1652–1654. doi: 10.1126/science.1176731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenas T, Luz I, Prieto G, Seoane B, Miro H, Corma A, Kapteijn F, Llabrés I, Xamena FX, Gascon J. 2015. Metal–organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation. Nat Mater. 14:48–55. doi: 10.1038/nmat4113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues MA, de Souza Ribeiro J, de Souza Costa E, de Miranda JL, Ferraz HC. 2018. Nanostructured membranes containing UiO-66 (Zr) and MIL-101 (Cr) for O2/N2 and CO2/N2 separation. Sep Purif Technol. 192:491–500. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.10.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan J, Schaffert F. 1984. The Ryan/Holmes technology an economical route for CO2 and liquids recovery. Chem Eng Prog. 80:53–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sabetghadam A, Liu X, Gottmer S, Chu L, Gascon J, Kapteijn F. 2019. Thin mixed matrix and dual layer membranes containing metal-organic framework nanosheets and Polyactive™ for CO2 capture. J Membr Sci. 570–571:226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarasinghe S, Chuah CY, Yang Y, Bae T-H. 2018. Tailoring CO2/CH4 separation properties of mixed-matrix membranes via combined use of two- and three-dimensional metal-organic frameworks. J Membr Sci. 557:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Liu G, Huang K, Li Q, Guan K, Li Y, Jin W. 2016. UiO-66-polyether block amide mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation. J Membr Sci. 513:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen M, Tong L, Yin S, Liu C, Wang L, Feng W, Ding Y. 2022. Cryogenic technology progress for CO2 capture under carbon neutrality goals: a review. Sep Purif Technol. 299:121734. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianou KC, Queen WL. 2015. Recent advances in carbon capture with metal–organic frameworks. Chimia. 69:274–283. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2015.274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su NC, Sun DT, Beavers CM, Britt DK, Queen WL, Urban JJ. 2016. Enhanced permeation arising from dual transport pathways in hybrid polymer–MOF membranes. Energy Environ Sci. 9:922–931. doi: 10.1039/C5EE02660A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumida K, Rogow DL, Mason JA, McDonald TM, Bloch ED, Herm ZR, Bae T-H, Long JR. 2012. Carbon dioxide capture in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Rev. 112:724–781. doi: 10.1021/cr2003272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Geng C, Zhang Z, Qiao Z, Zhong C. 2022. Two-dimensional basic cobalt carbonate supported ZIF-67 composites towards mixed matrix membranes for efficient CO2/N2 separation. J Membr Sci. 661:120928. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanvidkar P, Appari S, Kuncharam BVR. 2022. A review of techniques to improve performance of metal organic framework (MOF) based mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 21:539–569. doi: 10.1007/s11157-022-09612-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wu J, Cheng P, Xu L, Zhang S. 2023. Nanocomposite polymer blend membrane molecularly re-engineered with 2D metal-organic framework nanosheets for efficient membrane CO2 capture. J Membr Sci. 685:121950. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Ying Y, Zheng Y, Pu Y, Yang Z, Zhao D. 2022. Induced polymer crystallinity in mixed matrix membranes by metal-organic framework nanosheets for gas separation. J Membr Sci Lett. 2:100017. doi: 10.1016/j.memlet.2022.100017.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Xu Y, Qu H, Ma H, Chang R, Ma J. 2021. A highly permeable mixed matrix membrane containing a vertically aligned metal–organic framework for CO2 separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 13:50441–50450. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c16085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Li X, Wu H, Tian Z, Xin Q, He G, Peng D, Chen S, Yin Y, Jiang Z, et al. 2016. Advances in high permeability polymer-based membrane materials for CO2 separations. Energy Environ Sci. 9:1863–1890. doi: 10.1039/C6EE00811A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Tian Y, Fang W, Shrestha BB, Huang M, Jin J. 2021. Constructing strong interfacial interactions under mild conditions in MOF-incorporated mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 13:3166–3174. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c19554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Chuah CY, Bae T-H. 2019. Polyamine-appended porous organic polymers for efficient post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem Eng J. 358:1227–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Chuah CY, Bae T-H. 2021. Polyamine-appended porous organic copolymers with controlled structural properties for enhanced CO2 capture. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 9:2017–2026. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Chuah CY, Gong H, Bae T-H. 2017. Robust microporous organic copolymers containing triphenylamine for high pressure CO2 capture application. J CO₂ Util. 19:214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Goh K, Wang R, Bae T-H. 2017. High-performance nanocomposite membranes realized by efficient molecular sieving with CuBDC nanosheets. Chem Commun. 53:4254–4257. doi: 10.1039/C7CC00295E.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Wu Z, Peh SB, Ying Y, Yang H, Zhao D. 2023. Mixed-matrix membranes containing porous materials for gas separation: from metal–organic frameworks to discrete molecular cages. Engineering. 23:40–55. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2022.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Ying Y, Pu Y, Wang D, Yang H, Zhao D. 2022. Poly(ionic liquid)-functionalized UiO-66-(OH)2: improved interfacial compatibility and separation ability in mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 61:7626–7633. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin H, Alkaş A, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Telfer SG. 2020. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) using an emerging metal-organic framework (MUF-15) for CO2 separation. J Membr Sci. 609:118245. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying Y, Cheng Y, Peh SB, Liu G, Shah BB, Zhai L, Zhao D. 2019. Plasticization resistance-enhanced CO2 separation at elevated pressures by mixed matrix membranes containing flexible metal-organic framework fillers. J Membr Sci. 582:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousef AM, El-Maghlany WM, Eldrainy YA, Attia A. 2018. New approach for biogas purification using cryogenic separation and distillation process for CO2 capture. Energy. 156:328–351. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Zhu H, Sun J, Mao Y, Liu G, Jin W. 2017. Novel ZIF-300 mixed-matrix membranes for efficient CO2 capture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 9:38575–38583. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b12507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Nwani O, Tan Y, Agar DW. 2011. Carbon dioxide absorption into biphasic amine solvent with solvent loss reduction. Chem Eng Res Des. 89:1190–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Guo J, Xin Q, Zhang Y, Li X, Ding X, Zhang L, Zhao L, Ye H, Li H, et al. 2023. Novel aminated F-Ce nanosheet mixed matrix membranes with controllable channels for CO2 capture. Sep Purif Technol. 324:124512. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Wang Y, Ma Q, Huang Y, Zhang X, Ping J, Zhang Z, Lu Q, Yu Y, Xu H, et al. 2015. Ultrathin 2D metal–organic framework nanosheets. Adv Mater. 27:7372–7378. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Lian S, Li R, Yang Y, Zang G, Song C. 2023. Fabricating leaf-like hierarchical ZIF-67 as intra-mixed matrix membrane microarchitecture for efficient intensification of CO2 separation. Sep Purif Technol. 305:122460. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Cao X, Ma Z, Wang Z, Qiao Z, Wang J, Wang S. 2015. Mixed-matrix membranes for CO2/N2 separation comprising a poly(vinylamine) matrix and metal–organic frameworks. Ind Eng Chem Res. 54:5139–5148. doi: 10.1021/ie504786x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar