A relative approach to opinion formation

References

• Altafini, C. (2012). Dynamics of opinion forming in structurally balanced social networks. PLoS ONE, 7(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altafini, C. (2013). Consensus problems on networks with antagonistic interactions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58(4), 935–946. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2012.2224251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amblard, F., & Deffuant, G. (2004). The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its applications, 343, 725–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.06.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthonisse, J., & Tijms, H. (1977). Exponential convergence of products of stochastic matrices. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 59(2), 360–364. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022247X77901147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspers, P., & Godart, F. (2013). Sociology of fashion: Order and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145526
   Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://www.pnas.org/content/115/37/9216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of political polarization. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 784–811. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25472492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobo, L. D., Charles, C. Z., Krysan, M., & Simmons, A. D. (2012). The real record on racial attitudes. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Social trends in American life: Findings from the general social survey since 1972 (pp. 38–83). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400845569-005
   Google Scholar
• Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., Berger, W., Sack, G., & Flocken, C. (2016). Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40(2), 80–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2016.1147443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattoe-Brown, E. (2014). Using agent based modelling to integrate data on attitude change. Sociological Research Online, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., & Weisbuch, G. (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 3( 01n04), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525900000078
   Google Scholar
• DeGroot, M. H. (1974). Reaching a Consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69(345), 118–121. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2285509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, J., & Zhou, A. (2007). Eigenvalues of rank-one updated matrices with some applications. Applied Mathematics Letters, 20(12), 1223–1226. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893965907000614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustin, M., Ferreira, N., & Millns, S. (2019). Conclusion: Brexit, Gender Justice and the Overton Window. In M. Dustin, N. Ferreira, and S. Millns (Eds.), Gender and queer perspectives on brexit (pp. 463–472). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03122-0_18
   Google Scholar
• Eger, S. (2016). Opinion dynamics and wisdom under out-group discrimination. Mathematical Social Sciences, 80, 97–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2596546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban, J.-M., & Ray, D. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica, 62(4), 819–851. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feliciani, T., Flache, A., & Tolsma, J. (2017). How, when and where can spatial segregation induce opinion polarization? Two competing models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(2), 6. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/20/2/6.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flache, A., & Macy, M. W. (2011). Small worlds and cultural polarization. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 35(1–3), 146–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2010.532261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flache, A., Mäs, M., Feliciani, T., Chattoe-Brown, E., Deffuant, G., Huet, S., & Lorenz, J. (2017). Models of social influence: Towards the next frontiers. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(4), 2. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/20/4/2.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flache, A., & Torenvlied, R. (2004). When will they ever make up their minds?: The social structure of unstable decision making. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(3), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222500490480257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (1990). Social influence and opinions. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15(3–4), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1990.9990069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: Models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2015). Opinion dynamics under the influence of radical groups, charismatic leaders, and other constant signals: A simple unifying model. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 10(3), 477–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet, S., & Deffuant, G. (2010). Openness leads to opinion stability and narrowness to volatility. Advances in Complex Systems, 13(3), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525910002633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozitsin, I. V. (2020). Formal models of opinion formation and their application to real data: Evidence from online social networks. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2020.1835894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozitsin, I. V. (2021). Opinion dynamics of online social network users: A micro-level analysis. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2021.1956917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, U. (1997). Soziale Dynamiken mit vielen Interakteuren. Eine Problemskizze. Krause U. and Stöckler M. Modellierung und Simulation von Dynamiken mit vielen interagierenden Akteuren. Universität Bremen, 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Kim, Y., Lee, K., & Yang, J.-S. (2020). An agent-based model of deliberative democracy and polarization. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2020.1836625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. S. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers? American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 611–623. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23496642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. C., & Srivastava, S. B. (2015). Pulling closer and moving apart: Interaction, identity, and influence in the U.S. senate, 1973 to 2009. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414564182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Chen, X., Başar, T., & Belabbas, M. A. (2017). Exponential convergence of the discrete- and continuous-time Altafini models. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(12), 6168–6182. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2017.2700523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macy, M. W., Kitts, J., and Benard, S. (2003). Polarization in Dynamic Networks: A Hopfield Model of Emergent Structure. pp. 162–173 in Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, edited by R. Breiger, K. Carley, and P. Pattison. Washington: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, N. P. (2003). Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 319–345. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäs, M., Flache, A., Helbing, D., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2010). Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(10), e1000959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäs, M., Flache, A., & Kitts, J. (2014). Cultural integration and differentiation in groups and organizations. In Dignum, V., and Dignum, F. Perspectives on Culture and Agent-based Simulations. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality 3 ( 71-90). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01952-9_5
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, D. V. (1981). Schur complements and statistics. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 36, 187–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(81)90232-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proskurnikov, A. V., Calafiore, G. C., & Cao, M. (2020). Recurrent averaging inequalities in multi-agent control and social dynamics modeling. Annual Reviews in Control, 49, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proskurnikov, A. V., Matveev, A. S., & Cao, M. (2016). Opinion dynamics in social networks with hostile camps: Consensus vs. polarization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(6), 1524–1536. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2015.2471655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schur, J. (1917). Über Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises beschränkt sind. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1917(147), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1917.147.205
   Google Scholar
• Schweighofer, S., Schweitzer, F., & Garcia, D. (2020). A weighted balance model of opinion hyperpolarization. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 23(3). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/23/3/5.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, G., Altafini, C., & Baras, J. S. (2019). Dynamics over signed networks. SIAM Review, 61(2), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1134172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W., Davern, M., Freese, J., & Morgan, S. (1972-2018). General Social Surveys, 1972-2018. Principal Investigator, Smith, Tom W.; Co-Principal Investigators, Michael Davern, Jeremy Freese and Stephen L. Morgan. Chicago: NORC, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sobkowicz, P. (2012). Discrete model of opinion changes using knowledge and emotions as control variables. PloS one, 7(9), e44489–e44489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobkowicz, P. (2015). Extremism without extremists: Deffuant model with emotions. Frontiers in Physics, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2015.00017
   Google Scholar
• Stokman, F. N., & Stokman, J. V. (1995). Strategic control and interests, its effects on decision outcomes. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 20(4), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1995.9990167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, D., & Macy, M. W. (2001). In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/323039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takács, K., Flache, A., Mäs, M., & Amblard, F. (2016). Discrepancy and disliking do not induce negative opinion shifts. PLOS ONE, 11(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar