Hurdle-QAP models overcome dependency and sparsity in scientific collaboration count networks

References

• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butts, C. T. (2019). Sna: Tools for social network analysis. R package version 2.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sna .
   Google Scholar
• Cai, M., Wang, W., Cui, Y., & Stanley, H. E. (2018). Multiplex network analysis of employee performance and employee social relationships. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 490(C), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data (Vol. 53, Second edition edn ed.). Cambridge University Press. Econometric Society monographs.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H., Gim, J., Won, S., Kim, Y. J., Kwon, S., & Park, C. (2017). Network analysis for count data with excess zeros. BMC Genetics, 18(1), 93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claudel, M., Massaro, E., Santi, P., Murray, F., & Ratti, C. (2017). An exploration of collaborative scientific production at MIT through spatial organization and institutional affiliation. PLoS One, 12(6), e0179334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer, S. J., Leifeld, P., McClurg, S. D., & Rolfe, M. (2017). Navigating the range of statistical tools for inferential network analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 237–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. Interjournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T. (2003). Multicollinearity robust QAP for multiple-regression. NAACSOS Conference 2003. Pittsburgh, PA. http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/dekker_2003_multicollinearity.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika, 72(4), 563–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrmeir, L., Kneib, T., Lang, S., & Marx, B. (2013). Regression: Models, methods and applications. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farine, D. (2013). Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(12), 1187–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, S., & Kirkley, A. (2020). Mixing patterns in interdisciplinary co-authorship networks at multiple scales. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 7731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. (2019). Google Maps: https://www.google.de/maps.
   Google Scholar
• Gui, Q., Liu, C., & Debin, D. (2019). Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum, 105, 1–12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016718519302040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers. (2020). https://www.helmholtz.de/en/; 09/14/2020.
   Google Scholar
• Helmholtz Zentrum München. (2020). https://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/en/about-us/profile/facts-at-glance/index.html; 09/14/2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, P. D. (2015). Dyadic data analysis with amen. arXiv article: arXiv:1506.08237.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, P., Fosdick, B., & Volfovsky, A. (2020). Amen: Additive and multiplicative effects models for networks and relational data. R Package Version 1.4.4. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/amen/.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, P. D., Raftery, A. E., & Handcock, M. S. (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 1090–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, L. J. (1987). Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis. Statistics, (Vol. 73). Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Hwayoon, S., Barnett, G. A., & Nam, Y. (2021). A social network analysis of international tourism flow. Quality & Quantity, 55(2), 419–439.
   Google Scholar
• Justin, S., & Johnson, J. C. (2021). How inter-state amity and animosity complement migration networks to drive refugee flows: A multi-layer network analysis, 1991-2016. PLoS One, 16(1), e0245712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiber, C., & Zeileis, A. (2015). Count data regression with excess zeros: A flexible framework using the GLM toolbox. Workshop of the ERCIM Working Group on Computational and Methodological Statistics 2015. London, United Kingdom. https://www.zeileis.org/papers/ERCIM-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmann, T., Stubbemann, M., Kapa, M., Paris, M., Buenstorf, G., Hanika, T., Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., & Stumme, G. (2021). Proximity dimensions and the emergence of collaboration: A HypTrails study on German AI research. Scientometrics, 126, 9847–9868. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-021-03922-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10(4), 359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulahci, I. G., Rubenstein, D. I., Bugnyar, T., Hoppitt, W., Mikus, N., & Schwab, C. (2016). Social networks predict selective observation and information spread in ravens. Royal Society Open Science, 3(7), 160256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. (2019). Network comparison of socialization, learning and collaboration in the C40 cities climate group. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(1), 104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levron, Y., & Belikov, J. (2017). Reduction of power system dynamic models using sparse representations. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(5), 3893–3900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., Gonzalez, M., & Kaufman, J. (2012). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(1), 68–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Huang, S., & Hui, F. (2017). An application of network analysis on tourist attractions: The case of Xinjiang, China. Tourism Management, 58(C), 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• Mullahy, J. (1986). Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics, 33(3), 341–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nature. (2015). Mind meld. Nature, 525(7569), 289–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngugi, K. J. (2018). Social networks stimuli: A double dekker semi-partialling multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure (Mrqap) approach: Case of small-scale farmers in Kenya. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 11(4), 8716–8719.
   Google Scholar
• Pubmed. (2021). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; 03/05/2021: Citation database.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Remmel, A. (2021). Scientists want virtual meetings to stay after the COVID pandemic. Nature, 591(7849), 185–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar Miranda, A., & Claudel, M. (2021). Spatial proximity matters: A study on collaboration. PLoS One, 16(12), e0259965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scopus. (2021). https://www.scopus.com; 03/05/2021: Citation database.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, N., Jing, L., Jin, C., & Zhou, P. (2014). Sparse gene expression data analysis based on truncated power. Pages 39–44 of: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). Belfast, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Sidorov, S. P., Faizliev, A. R., Balash, V. A., Gudkov, A. A., Chekmareva, A. Z., Levshunov, M., & Mironov, S. V. (2018). QAP analysis of company co-mention network. In A. Bonato, P. Prałat, & A. Raigorodskii Eds., Algorithms and models for the web graph Lecture notes in computer science Theoretical computer science and general issues (Vol. 10836, pp. 83–98). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, W. (2001). The quadratic assignment procedure (QAP). North American Stata Users’ Group Meetings 2001 1.2, Stata Users Group. Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• University, B. (2020). Daten und Zahlen - Universität Bielefeld; https://www.uni-bielefeld.de/uni/profil/daten-zahlen/; 09/14/2020.
   Google Scholar
• Web of Science. (2021). https://www.webofknowledge.com; 03/05/2021: Citation database.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N., Goude, Y., & Shaw, S. (2015). Generalized additive models for large data sets. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 64(1), 139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeileis, A., & Kleiber, C. (2020). Countreg: Count data regression. R package, version 0.2-1. https://rdrr.io/rforge/countreg/.
   Google Scholar
• Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C., & Jackman, S. (2008). Regression models for count data in R: Journal of statistical software. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(8), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar