Everybody herds, sometimes: cumulative advantage as a product of rational learning

References

• Anderson, L. R., & Holt, A. H. (1997). Information cascades in the laboratory. The American Economic Review, 87(5), 847–862. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, S., Feldhaus, C., & Ochenfels, A. (2018). A shared identity promotes herding in an information cascade game. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 4(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-018-0050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C. (2005). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as information cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2138632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. PNAS, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.17195571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press & Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., Ho, T. H., & Chong, J. K. (2004). A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 861–898. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centola, D. (2011). An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science, 334, 1269–1272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centola, D. (2021). Change: How to make big things happen. Little, Brown Spark.
   Google Scholar
• Centola, D., Willer, R., & Macy, M. (2005). The Emperor’s Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self-Enforcing Norms. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1009–1040. https://doi.org/10.1086/427321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. Inter Journal, Complex Systems, 1695. https://igraph.org
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easly, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flache, A., & Macy, M. W. (2002). Stochastic collusion and the power law of learning: A general reinforcement learning model of cooperation. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), 629–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200202236167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1995). The winner-take-all society: How more and more Americans compete for ever fewer and bigger prizes, encouraging economic waste, income inequality, and an impoverished cultural life. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, V., & van de Rijt, A. (2016). Arbitrary inequality in reputation systems. Scientific Reports, 6, 38304. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. Little, Brown and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1997). Sociological rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 191–214. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedström, P. (2009). Dissecting the social. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 895–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53(2), 298–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opp, K. D. (2009). Theories of political protest and social movements: A multidisciplinary introduction, critique, and synthesis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raafat, R. M., Chater, N., & Firth, C. (2009). Herding in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (1981). The economics of superstars. The American Economic Review, 71(5), 845–858. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1803469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3
   Google Scholar
• Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311, 854–856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, B., & Aksoy, O. (2017). Cumulative advantage in collective action groups: How competition for group members alters the provision of public goods. Social Science Research, 66, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1829263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, D., & Macy, M. W. (2001). In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/323039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueman, B. (1994). Analyst forecasts and herding behavior. The Review of Financial Studies, 7(1), 97–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2962287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (2007). Is Justin Timberlake a product of cumulative advantage? New York Times, April 15. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/15/magazine/15wwlnidealab.t.html
   Google Scholar