Shorter hours and productivity: evidence from bituminous coal

References

• Archbald, H. (1922). The four hour day in coal. H.W. Wilson Company.
   Google Scholar
• Atack, J., & Bateman, F. (1992). How long was the workday in 1880? The Journal of Economic History, 52(1), 129–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700010299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atack, J., Bateman, F., & Margo, R. A. (2003). Productivity in manufacturing and the length of the working day: Evidence from the 1880 Census of Manufactures. Explorations in Economic History, 40(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4983(03)00016-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzel, Y. (1973). The determination of daily hours and wages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boal, W. M. (2006). New estimates of paid-up membership in the United mine workers, 1902-29, by state and province. Labor History, 47(4), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/00236560600899289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boal, W. M. (2017). The effect of unionization on productivity: Evidence from a long panel of coal mines. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 70(5), 1254–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793916682222
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, M. C. (1932). Shorter hours: A study of the movement since the Civil War. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, D. L. (2000). The wage and the length of the work day: From the 1890s to 1991. Journal of Labor Economics, 18(1), 156–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/209954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembe, A. E. (2011). Factors shaping the development of working time regulation in the United states and Europe. International Labour Review, 150(3–4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2011.00126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison, E. F. (1962). The sources of economic growth in the United states and the alternatives before us. New York Committee for Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Doucouliagos, C., & Laroche, P. (2003). What do unions do to productivity? A meta-analysis. Industrial Relations, 42(4), 650–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-232X.00310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, P. H. (1930). Real wages in the United states 1890-1926. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (1920). History of the United mine workers of America (Vol. Vol. 1 & 2). Allied Printing Trades Council.
   Google Scholar
• Factory Inspectors Office. (1849). Reports of the Inspectors of factories for the half year ending 31st October 1849. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Feldstein, M. (1967). Specification of the labor input in the aggregate production function. Review of Economic Studies, 34(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishback, P. V. (1992). Soft coal, hard choices: The economic welfare of bituminous coal miners, 1890-1930. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, I. (1911). Industrial hygiene as a factor in human efficiency. Human Engineering, 1(4), 254–258.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. E., & Bezanson, A. (1932). Wage rates and working time in the bituminous coal industry, 1912-1922. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurter, F., Brandeis, L. D., Bunting, F. O., & Goldmark, J. C. (1916). The case for the shorter work day. Franklin O. Bunting, plaintiff in error, vs. The state of Oregon, defendant in error. Brief for defendant in error. Reprinted by National Consumers League.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, G. (1992). Dividing labor: Urban politics and big-city construction in late nineteenth-century America. In C. Goldin & H. Rockoff (Eds.), Strategic factors in nineteenth century American economic history (pp. 447–464). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, J. E. (1898a). The coal miners’ strike of 1897. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882118
   Google Scholar
• George, J. E. (1898b). The settlement in the coal-mining industry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(4), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882955
   Google Scholar
• Goldmark, J. C. (1912). Fatigue and efficiency; a study in industry (3rd ed.). Charities Publication Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, C. (1925). The miner’s freedom: A study of the working life in a changing industry. Marshall Jones Company.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (1972). Unemployment and politics a study in English social policy, 1886-1914. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. (1935). The theory of wages. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, B. T. (2007). What do unions do for economic performance? In B. E. Kaufman & J. T. Bennett (Eds.), What Do Unions Do? A Twenty-Year Perspective (pp. 193–237). New Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, M. (2004). Working hours of the world unite? New international evidence of worktime, 1870-1913. Journal of Economic History, 64(4), 964–1001. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050704043050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illinois Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1891-1905). Coal in Illinois. H. W. Rokker.
   Google Scholar
• Kniesner, T. J. (1976). The full-time workweek in the United states, 1900-1970. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2522747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauck, W. J. (1920). The sanction for the eight-hour day. Washington, DC: United Mine Workers of America.
   Google Scholar
• Lebergott, S. (1964). Manpower in economic growth: The American record since 1800. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, R. A. (1941). Economics of labor. MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, W. (1894). The forty-eight hours week: A year’s experiment and its results at the Salford Iron Works. Manchester (Mather & Platt, Ld.). Guardian Printing Works.
   Google Scholar
• Meer, J., & West, J. (2016). Effects of the minimum wage on employment dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 51(2), 500–522. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.51.2.0414-6298R1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official Report of the Proceedings of the Joint Conference of Miners and Operators Held at Chicago, Illinois, January 17-28, 1898. (1898).
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. D. (1978). Hours of work in the long run: Trends, explanations, scenarios, and implications. In Work time and employment: a conference report (pp. 31–64). Washington, D.C.: National Commission for Manpower Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Pencavel, J. H. (2015). The productivity of working hours. The Economic Journal, 125(589), 2052–2076. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pencavel, J. H. (2016). Recovery from work and the productivity of working hours. Economica, 83(332), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pencavel, J. H. (2018). Diminishing returns at work: The consequences of long working hours. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. Macmillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. (1929). The economic effects of variations of hours of labour. The Economic Journal, 39(153), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224213
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, J. L., & Sundstrom, W. A. (1994). The decline of hours of work in US labour markets, 1890-1903. In G. Grantham & M. MacKinnon (Eds.), Labor market evolution (pp. 161–184). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (1907). A history of the coal miners of the United states from the development of the mines to the close of the anthracite strike of 1902, including a brief sketch of early British miners. J. L. Trauger.
   Google Scholar
• Senior, N. W., & Horner, L. (1837). Letters on the Factory Act, as it affects the cotton manufacture, addressed to the right Honourable the President of the Board of Trade. B. Fellowes.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestre, J. (2021). Productivity, mortality, and technology in European and US coal mining, 1800-1913. EHES Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Suffern, A. E. (1926). The coal miners’ struggle for industrial status: A study of the evolution of organized relations and industrial principles in the coal industry. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bituminous Coal Commission. (1920). Majority and minority reports. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1919) . Wages and hours of labor in the coal mining industry in 1919. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Coal Commission. (1925). Report, part III bituminous coal–detailed Labor and Engineering studies. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. (1897-1929). Mineral resources of the United states. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Industrial Commission. (1901). Report on the relations and conditions of capital and labor employed in the mining industry. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Industrial Commission. (1902). Final report. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S., & Cox, H. (1891). The eight hours day. W. Scott.
   Google Scholar
• Whaples, R. (1990). Winning the eight-hour day, 1909-1919. Journal of Economic History, 50(2), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700036512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaples, R. (2001). Hours of work in U.S. History. In R. Whaples (Ed.), Eh.Net Encyclopedia of Economic and Business History. Economic History Association. http://eh.net/encyclopedia/hours-of-work-in-u-s-history/
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (1987). Working hours: Assessing the potential for reduction. International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfers, J. (2006). Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1802–1820. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, L. (1936). Ebb and flow of trade unionism. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar