Sexual systems in the New Zealand angiosperm flora

References

• Alice LA, Campbell CS. 1999. Phylogeny of Rubus (Rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. American Journal of Botany. 86:81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong JA. 1979. Biotic pollination mechanisms in the Australian flora - a review. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 17(4):467–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett SCH. 1996. The reproductive biology and genetics of island plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 351(1341):725–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawa KS. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 11:15–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bawa KS, Opler PA. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution. 29:167–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean A. 1995. Revision of Rubus subgenus Micranthobatus (Fritsch) Kalkman (Rosaceae) in Australia. Austrobaileya. 4:321–328.
   Google Scholar
• Bolmgren K, Lönnberg K. 2005. Herbarium data reveal an association between fleshy fruit type and earlier flowering time. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 166(4):663–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buide ML, Sanchez JM, Guitian J. 1998. Ecological characteristics of the flora of the northwest Iberian peninsula. Plant Ecology. 135:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock SH. 1985. Breeding systems in the flora of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica. 17:287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunsawat J, Elliott NE, Hertweck KL, Sproles E, Alice LA. 2004. Phylogenetics of Mentha (Lamiaceae): evidence from chloroplast DNA sequences. Systematic Botany. 29:959–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows CJ. 1994. The seed always knows best. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 32(3):349–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DR, Bischoff M, Lord JM, Robertson AW. 2010. Flower color influences insect visitation in alpine New Zealand. Ecology. 91(9):2638–2649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantley JT, Swenson NG, Markey A, Keeley SC. 2014. Biogeographic insights on pacific coprosma (Rubiaceae) indicate two colonizations to the Hawaiian islands. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 174:412–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso CM, Eisen K, Case AL. 2016. An angiosperm-wide analysis of the correlates of gynodioecy. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 177(2):115–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XS, Li QJ. 2008. Sexual systems and ecological correlates in an azonal tropical forests, SW China. Biotropica. 40(2):160–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conn J, Wentworth T, Blum U. 1980. Patterns of dioecism in the flora of the Carolinas. American Midland Naturalist. 103:310–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coode M. 1985. Aristotelia and Vallea, closely related in Elaeocarpaceae. Kew Bulletin. 40:479–507.
   Google Scholar
• Crayn DM, Rossetto M, Maynard DJ. 2006. Molecular phylogeny and dating reveals an Oligo-Miocene radiation of dry-adapted shrubs (former Tremandraceae) from rainforest tree progenitors (Elaeocarpaceae) in Australia. American Journal of Botany. 93(9):1328–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Lucas R, Connor J, Sneddon B 2019. New Zealand's native trees. 2nd ed. Nelson: Potton & Burton; p. 688.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong TJ, Shmida A, Thuijsman F. 2008. Sex allocation in plants and the evolution of monoecy. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 10(8):1087–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lima KB, Ferreira PA, Groppo M, Goldenberg R, Pansarin ER, Barreto RC, Coelho GP, Barros-Souza Y, Boscolo D. 2020. Does landscape context affect pollination-related functional diversity and richness of understory flowers in forest fragments of atlantic rainforest in southeastern Brazil? Ecological Processes. 9(1):62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delph LF. 1990. The evolution of gender dimorphism in New Zealand Hebe (Scrophulariaceae) species. Evolutionary Trends in Plants. 4(2):85–97.
   Google Scholar
• Delph LF, Lloyd DG. 1996. Inbreeding depression in the gynodioecious shrub Hebe subalpina (Scrophulariaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany. 34(2):241–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugdale JS. 1989. New Zealand Lepidoptera: basic biogeography. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 16(4):679–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner M, Lee W, Wilson JB. 1997. A comparative study of the distribution of genus size in twenty angiosperm floras. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 62:225–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores S, Schemske DW. 1984. Dioecy and monoecy in the flora of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands: ecological correlates. Biotropica. 16:132–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford HA, Paton DC, Forde N. 1979. Birds as pollinators of Australian plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 17(4):509–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster CS, Henwood MJ, Ho SY. 2018. Plastome sequences and exploration of tree-space help to resolve the phylogeny of riceflowers (Thymelaeaceae: Pimelea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 127:156–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M. 2015. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. The American Naturalist. 160:712–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman DC, Harper KT, Ostler WK. 1979. Ecology of plant dioecy in the intermountain region of western North America and california. Oecologia. 44(3):410–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Barrett SCH. 2009. Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Annals of Botany. 103(9):1515–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner RO. 2008. Gender dimorphism in Toronia toru (Proteaceae). New Zealand Natural Sciences. 33:43.
   Google Scholar
• Garnock-Jones PJ. 2014. Evidence-based review of the taxonomic status of New Zealand's endemic seed plant genera. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 52(2):163–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givnish TJ. 1982. Outcrosing versus ecological constraints in the evolution of dioecy. American Naturalist. 119(6):849–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givnish TJ. 2010. Ecology of plant speciation. Taxon. 59(5):1326–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givnish TJ, Kriebel R, Zaborsky JG, Rose JP, Spalink D, Waller DM, Cameron KM, Sytsma KJ. 2020. Adaptive associations among life history, reproductive traits, environment, and origin in the Wisconsin angiosperm flora. American Journal of Botany. 107:1677–1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godley EJ. 1957. Unisexual flowers in the ericales. Nature. 180(4580):284–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godley EJ. 1964. Breeding systems in New Zealand plants: 3. Sex ratios in some natural populations. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 2(2):205–212.
   Google Scholar
• Godley EJ. 1979. Flower biology in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 17(4):441–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross CL. 2005. A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes - more monoecy but why? American Journal of Botany. 92(6):907–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heenan PB, McGlone MS. 2019. Cenozoic formation and colonisation history of the New Zealand vascular flora based on molecular clock dating of the plastid rbcL gene. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 57:204–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham RK, McQuillan PB. 2000. Cyathodes divaricata (Epacridaceae); the first record of a bird-pollinated dioecious plant in the Australian flora. Australian Journal of Botany. 48(1):93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdaway RJ, Easdale TA, Carswell FE, Richardson SJ, Peltzer DA, Mason NWH, Brandon AM, Coomes DA. 2017. Nationally representative plot network reveals contrasting drivers of net biomass change in secondary and old-growth forests. Ecosystems. 20(5):944–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes GD, Weston PH, Murphy DJ, Connelly C, Cantrill DJ. 2018. The genealogy of geebungs: phylogenetic analysis of Persoonia (Proteaceae) and related genera in subfamily Persoonioideae. Australian Systematic Botany. 31(2):166–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra-Manriquez G, Oyama K. 1992. Ecological correlates of reproductive traits of Mexican rain-forest trees. American Journal of Botany. 79(4):383–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Castillo M, Wiser SK, Lusk CH. 2007. Elevational parallels of latitudinal variation in the proportion of lianas in woody floras. Journal of Biogeography. 34(1):163–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käfer J, Marais GAB, Pannell JR. 2017. On the rarity of dioecy in flowering plants. Molecular Ecology. 26(5):1225–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay Q, Stevens D. 1986. The frequency, distribution and reproductive biology of dioecious species in the native flora of Britain and Ireland. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 92(1):39–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevan PG, Godglick B. 2016. High incidence and correlates of dioecy in the flora of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Arctic Science. 3(4):745–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick SE, Ford AJ, Freudenstein JV. 2009. Taxonomic revision of Passiflora subgenus Tetrapathea including the monotypic genera Hollrungia and Tetrapathea (Passifloraceae), and a new species of Passiflora. Systematic Botany. 34(2):375–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Lee W, Jordan G, Barreda V. 2016. The cenozoic history of New Zealand temperate rainforests: comparisons with southern Australia and South America. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 54(2):100–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DE, Lee WG, Mortimer N. 2001. Where and why have all the flowers gone? Depletion and turnover in the New Zealand Cenozoic angiosperm flora in relation to palaeogeography and climate. Australian Journal of Botany. 49(3):341–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HY, Tseng YH, Hsieh CF, Hu JM. 2020. Geographical distribution of dioecy and its ecological correlates based on fine-scaled species distribution data from a subtropical island. Ecological Research. 35(1):170–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DG. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica. 45:325–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DG. 1980a. The distributions of gender in 4 angiosperm species illustrating 2 evolutionary pathways to dioecy. Evolution. 34(1):123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DG. 1980b. Sexual strategies in plants. 3. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 18(1):103–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DG. 1985. Progress in understanding the natural history of New Zealand plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 23(4):707–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord JM. 1999. Fleshy-fruitedness in the New Zealand flora. Journal of Biogeography. 26(6):1249–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado IC, Lopes AV. 2004. Floral traits and pollination systems in the Caatinga, a Brazilian tropical dry forest. Annals of Botany. 94(3):365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark AF 2012. Above the treeline: a nature guide to alpine New Zealand. Nelson: Craig Potton Publishing; p. 472.
   Google Scholar
• Matallana G, Wendt T, Araujo DSD, Scarano FR. 2005. High abundance of dioecious plants in a tropical coastal vegetation. American Journal of Botany. 92(9):1513–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy JK, McGlone MS, Heenan PB. 2021. Lineage through time analyses have their limitations: the case of the New Zealand flora. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 59(2):157–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComb J. 1966. The sex forms of species in the flora of the south-west of western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany. 14(3):303–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone MS, Buitenwerf R, Richardson SJ. 2016. The formation of the oceanic temperate forests of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 54(2):128–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone MS, Heenan P, Millar T, Cieraad E. 2018. The biogeography, origin and characteristics of the vascular plant flora and vegetation of the New Zealand mountains. In: Hoorn C, Perrigo A, Antonelli A, editors. Mountains, climate and biodiversity. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell; p. 375–389.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone MS, Richardson SJ, Jordan GJ. 2010. Comparative biogeography of New Zealand trees: species richness, height, leaf traits and range sizes. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 34(1):137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miikeda O, Kita K, Handa T, Yukawa T. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of Clematis (Ranunculaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 152(2):153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JS, Blank CM, Levin RA. 2019. Colonization, Baker's law, and the evolution of gynodioecy in Hawaii: implications from a study of Lycium carolinianum. American Journal of Botany. 106:733–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell AD, Heenan PB, Murray BG, Molloy BPJ, de Lange PJ. 2009. Evolution of the south-western pacific genus Melicytus (Violaceae): evidence from DNA sequence data, cytology and sex expression. Australian Systematic Botany. 22(3):143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moles AT, Ackerly DD, Tweddle JC, Dickie JB, Smith R, Leishman MR, Mayfield MM, Pitman A, Wood JT, Westoby M. 2007. Global patterns in seed size. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 16(1):109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer N, Campbell HJ, Tulloch AJ, King PR, Stagpoole VM, Wood RA, Rattenbury MS, Sutherland R, Adams CJ, Collot J. 2017. Zealandia: earth’s hidden continent. GSA Today. 27(3):27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Muller-Landau HC, Hardesty BD. 2005. Seed dispersal of woody plants in tropical forests: concepts, examples and future directions. In: Burslem D, Pinard M, Hartley S, editors. Biotic interactions in the tropics: their role in the maintenance of species diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; p. 267–309.
   Google Scholar
• Newstrom LE, Robertson A. 2005. Progress in understanding pollination systems in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 43(1):1–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford EA, Watson MF, Preston J. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of species of Aciphylla (Apiaceae, subfamily Apioideae) and related genera using molecular, morphological, and combined data sets. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 39(2):183–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez N. 2005. Plant sexual systems, dichogamy, and herkogamy in the Venezuelan central plain. Flora-morphology, distribution. Functional Ecology of Plants. 200(1):30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichgelt T, Kennedy EM, Conran JG, Mildenhall DC, Lee DE. 2015. The early Miocene paleolake Manuherikia: vegetation heterogeneity and warm-temperate to subtropical climate in southern New Zealand. Journal of Paleolimnology. 53(4):349–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner SS. 2014. The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. American Journal of Botany. 101(10):1588–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner SS, Ricklefs RE. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany. 82(5):596–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivkin LR, Case AL, Caruso CM. 2016. Why is gynodioecy a rare but widely distributed sexual system? lessons from the lamiaceae. New Phytologist. 211(2):688–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson AW, Kelly D, Ladley JJ. 2011. Futile selfing in the trees Fuchsia excorticata (Onagraceae) and Sophora microphylla (Fabaceae): inbreeding depression over 11 years. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 172(2):191–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai AK, Wagner WL, Ferguson DM, Herbst DR. 1995a. Origins of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology. 76(8):2517–2529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai AK, Wagner WL, Ferguson DM, Herbst DR. 1995b. Biogeographical and ecological correlatives of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology. 76(8):2530–2543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlessman MA. 2010. Major events in the evolution of sexual systems in Apiales: ancestral andromonoecy abandoned. Plant Diversity and Evolution. 128:233–245.
   Google Scholar
• Schlessman MA, Vary LB, Munzinger J, Lowry PP. 2014. Incidence, correlates, and origins of dioecy in the island flora of New Caledonia. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 175:271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönberger I, Wilton AD, Boardman KF, Breitwieser I, Cochrane M, de Lange PJ, de Pauw B, Fife AJ, Ford KA, Gibb ES, et al. 2018. Checklist of the New Zealand Flora – Seed Plants. https://datastore.landcareresearch.co.nz/dataset/checklist-of-the-new-zealand-flora-seed-plants-2018/resource/dd905eb5-0a57-487d-82db-cc4a2db5cac4.
   Google Scholar
• Senarath W. 2008. Dioecy and monoecy in the flora of Sri Lanka and their evolutionary correlations to endemism, growth form, fruit type, seed number and flower size. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy. 15:13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Peh KSH, Tan HTW, Chazdon RL, Corlett RT, Lee TM, Colwell RK, Brook BW, Sekercioglu CH, et al. 2008. Correlates of extinction proneness in tropical angiosperms. Diversity and Distributions 14: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner KE. 1988. Dioecism and its correlates in the cape flora of South Africa. American Journal of Botany. 75(11):1742–1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland R, Dickens GR, Blum P, Agnini C, Alegret L, Asatryan G, Bhattacharya J, Bordenave A, Chang L, Collot J. 2020. Continental-scale geographic change across Zealandia during Paleogene subduction initiation. Geology. 48(5):419–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas SC. 1996. Asymptotic height as a predictor of growth and allometric characteristics Malaysian rain forest trees. American Journal of Botany. 83(5):556–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson JD, Thomson BA. 1992. Pollen presentation and viability schedules in animal-pollinated plants: consequences for reproductive success. In: Wyatt R, editor. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. New York: Chapman and Hall; p. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsen MJ, Dickinson KJM, Seddon PJ. 2009. Seed dispersal systems in the New Zealand flora. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 11:285–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torices R, Méndez M, Gómez JM. 2011. Where do monomorphic sexual systems fit in the evolution of dioecy? Insights from the largest family of angiosperms. New Phytologist. 190:234–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewick SA, Bland KJ. 2012. Fire and slice: palaeogeography for biogeography at New Zealand's North Island/South Island juncture. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 42(3):153–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng Y-H, Hsieh C-F, Hu J-M. 2008. Incidences and ecological correlates of dioecious angiosperms in Taiwan and its outlying Orchid island. Botanical Studies. 49(3):261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdivia CE, Simonetti JA. 2007. Decreased frugivory and seed germination rate do not reduce seedling recruitment rates of Aristotelia chilensis in a fragmented forest. Biodiversity and Conservation. 16:1593–1602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamosi JC, Otto SP, Barrett SCH. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 16(5):1006–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamosi JC, Zhang Y, Wilson WG. 2007. Animal dispersal dynamics promoting dioecy over hermaphroditism. The American Naturalist. 170(3):485–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff SJ, Bayly MJ, Garnock-Jones PJ, Albach DC. 2002. Classification, origin, and diversification of the New Zealand hebes (Scrophulariaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 89:38–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlert GA, Marcussen T, de Paula-Souza J, Feng M, Ballard HE. 2014. A phylogeny of the Violaceae (Malpighiales) inferred from plastid DNA sequences: implications for feneric diversity and intrafamilial classification. Systematic Botany. 39:239–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Luo A, Lyu T, Dimitrov D, Xu X, Freckleton RP, Li Y, Su X, Li Y, Liu Y, et al. 2021. Global distribution and evolutionary transitions of angiosperm sexual systems. Ecology Letters 24(9): 1835–1847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lyu T, Luo A, Li Y, Liu Y, Freckleton RP, Liu S, Wang Z. 2020a. Spatial patterns and drivers of angiosperm sexual systems in China differ between woody and herbaceous species. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11:1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lyu T, Shrestha N, Lyu L, Li Y, Schmid B, Freckleton RP, Dimitrov D, Liu S, Hao Z. 2020b. Drivers of large-scale geographical variation in sexual systems of woody plants. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 29:546–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb CJ, Kelly D. 1993. The reproductive biology of the New Zealand flora. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 8(12):442–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb CJ, Lloyd DG, Delph LF. 1999. Gender dimorphism in indigenous New Zealand seed plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 37:119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 33:125–159.
   Google Scholar
• Xia F, Cheng F, Liu Z, Lin L, Wang H, Wang G. 2020. Sexual system and ecological links of flowering plants in Changbai mountain. Russian Journal of Ecology. 51(4):345–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar