References
- Ahlstrøm, A., Bjørkelo, K.D. & Fadnes, K. 2019. AR5 Klassifikasjonssystem: Klassifisering av arealressurser. NIBIO BOK 5(5). http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2596511 (accessed 23 August 2023).
- Angradi, T.R., Launspach, J.J. & Debbout, R. 2018. Determining preferences for ecosystem benefits in Great Lakes Areas of Concern from photographs posted to social media. Journal of Great Lakes Research 44(2), 340–351.
- Antoniou, V., Morley J. & Haklay, M. 2010. Web 2.0 geotagged photos: Assessing the spatial dimension of the phenomenon. Geomatica 64(1), 99–110.
- Artsdatabanken. 2021. Hvor finnes de truede artene? https://artsdatabanken.no/rodlisteforarter2021/Resultater/Hvorfinnesdetrueteartene (accessed 25 November 2022).
- Aune-Lundberg, L. & Ulfeng, H. 2020. Mye jord der folk flest bor. NIBIO POP Vol. 6, No. 39. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2684856 (accessed 3 September 2023).
- Bongaarts, J. 2019. IPBES, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. [Short Review.] Population and Development Review 45(3), 680–681.
- Bryn, A., Flø, B.E., Daugstad, K., Dybedal, P. & Vinge, H. 2013. Cultour – et forskningsprosjekt om reiseliv, kulturminner og gjengroing. Skog og landskap. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2453878 (accessed 23 August 2023).
- Bubalo, M., van Zanten, B.T. & Verburg, P.H. 2019. Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 184, 101–111.
- Ciesielski, M. & Stereńczak, K. 2021. Using Flickr data and selected environmental characteristics to analyse the temporal and spatial distribution of activities in forest areas. Forest Policy and Economics 129: Article 102509.
- Council of Europe. n.d. Council of Europe Landscape Convention. CETS No. 176. https://www.coe.int/en/web/landscape (accessed 25 November 2022).
- da Mota, V.T. & Pickering, C. 2020. Using social media to assess nature-based tourism: Current research and future trends. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 30: Article 100295.
- Dunkel, A. 2015. Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landscape and Urban Planning 142, 173–186.
- Engan, G. & Bentzen, F. 2017. 3Q Instruks for flybildetolking – Instruksversjon 2011. NIBIO Rapport 3(123). http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2484990 (accessed 23 August 2023).
- Flickr. 2018. Why we’re changing Flickr free accounts. https://blog.flickr.net/en/2018/11/01/changing-flickr-free-accounts-1000-photos/ (accessed 25 November 2022).
- Flickr. n.d. About Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/about (accessed 25 November 2022).
- Fox, N., August, T., Mancini, F., Parks, K.E., Eigenbrod, F., Bullock, J.M., Sutter, L. & Graham, L.J. 2020. ‘photosearcher’ package in R: An accessible and reproducible method for harvesting large datasets from Flickr. SoftwareX 12: Article 100624.
- Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M.B. 2018. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1: Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf (accessed 3 September 2023).
- Hartmann, M.C., Koblet, O., Baer, M.F. & Purves, R.S. 2022. Automated motif identification: Analysing Flickr images to identify popular viewpoints in Europe’s protected areas. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 37: Article 100479.
- Havinga, I., Marcos, D., Bogaart, P.W., Hein, L. & Tuia, D. 2021. Social media and deep learning capture the aesthetic quality of the landscape. Scientific Reports 11(1): Article 20000.
- Joo, J. & Steinert-Threlkeld, Z.C. 2019. Image as data: Automated visual content analysis for social science. SAGE Ocean. https://ocean.sagepub.com/blog/image-as-data-automated-visual-content-analysis-for-social-science (accessed 6 July 2023).
- Komossa, F., Wartmann, F.M., Kienast, F. & Verburg, P.H. 2020. Comparing outdoor recreation preferences in peri-urban landscapes using different data gathering methods. Landscape and Urban Planning 199: Article 103796.
- Komossa, F., Wartmann, F.M. & Verburg, P.H. 2021. Expanding the toolbox: Assessing methods for local outdoor recreation planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 212: Article 104105.
- Nasar, J.L. & Li, M. 2004. Landscape mirror: The attractiveness of reflecting water. Landscape and Urban Planning 66(4), 233–238.
- Olsson, G.A. & Rønningen, K. 1999. Environmental Values in Norwegian Agricultural Landscapes. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Katrina-Ronningen/publication/266217963_Environmental_values_in_Norwegian_agricultural_landscapes/links/5ad5de34aca272fdaf7c9486/Environmental-values-in-Norwegian-agricultural-landscapes.pdf (accessed 3 September 2023).
- Oteros-Rozas, E., Martín-López, B., Fagerholm, N., Bieling, C. & Plieninger, T. 2018. Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites. Ecological Indicators 94, 74–86.
- Purcell, A.T. & Lamb R.J. 1998. Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 42(1), 57–66.
- Richards, D.R. & Friess, D.A. 2015. A rapid indicator of cultural ecosystem service usage at a fine spatial scale: Content analysis of social media photographs. Ecological Indicators 53, 187–195.
- Statistisk sentralbyrå. n.d. Fakta om jordbruk. https://www.ssb.no/jord-skog-jakt-og-fiskeri/faktaside/jordbruk (accessed 6 July 2023).
- Tenkanen, H., Di Minin, E., Heikinheimo, V., Hausmann, A., Herbst, M., Kajala, L. & Toivonen, T. 2017. Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: Assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas. Scientific Reports 7: Article 17615.
- Wartmann, F.M., Baer, M.F., Hegetschweiler, K.T., Fischer, C., Hunziker, M. & Purves, R.S. 2021. Assessing the potential of social media for estimating recreational use of urban and peri-urban forests. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 64: Article 127261.
- Yamashita, S. 2002. Perception and evaluation of water in landscape: Use of Photo-Projective Method to compare child and adult residents’ perceptions of a Japanese river environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 62(1), 3–17.