Impact Analysis of a Commercial Airplane Over a Nuclear Spent Fuel Dry Storage Cask

References

• “Impacts Associated with Transfer of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Spent Fuel Storage Pools to Dry Storage After Five Years of Cooling, Revision 1,” EPRI 1025206 Technical Report, Electric Power Research Institute (2012).
   Google Scholar
• “Dry Cask Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” Backgrounder, Office of Public Affairs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0622/ML062200058.pdf (accessed Mar. 21, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• L. M. RUIZ and H. G. OROZCO, “Containers for Temporary Storage and Transportation of Spent Fuel,” Nuclear Safety and Radiological Protection Magazine (2015); https://www.csn.es/documents/10182/13557/Alfa+27 (accessed May 20, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• “Safety of Spent Fuel Transportation,” NUREG/BR-0292, Rev. 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2017); https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1703/ML17038A460.pdf (accessed May 28, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• M. HANIFEHZADEH, B. GENCTURK, and K. WILLIAM, “Dynamic Structural Response of Reinforced Concrete Dry Storage Casks Subjected to Impact Considering Material Degradation,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 325, 192 (Dec. 2017); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. TUNG-YUEH, L. HSUEH-YUAN, and K. LONG-CHYUAN, “Dynamic Response Analysis of a Spent-Fuel Dry Storage Cask Under Vertical Drop Accident,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 42, 18 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SIEFERT, F.-O. HENKEL, and E. ALDOGHAIM, “Modelling of Aircraft Cessna 210 for Impact Analysis on Nuclear Building,” presented at the 23rd Conf. Structural Mechanical Reactor Technology (2015); https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstream/handle/1840.20/33987/SMiRT-23_Paper_580.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed Aug. 29, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. ORNAI et al., “A Methodology of Risk Assessment, Management, and Coping Actions for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Hit by High-Explosive Warheads,” Adv. Eng. Inf., 46, 101192 (Oct. 2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. ZHU et al., “Sensitivity Analysis of Steel-Plate Concrete Containment Against a Large Commercial Aircraft,” Energies, 14, 2829 (2021); http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14102829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. ALMOMANI, S. LEE, and H. GOOK KANG, “Structural Analysis of a Metal Spent-Fuel Storage Cask in an Aircraft Crash for Risk Assessment,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 308, 60 (2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Y. H. BANGASH, Structures for Nuclear Facilities: Analysis, Design, and Construction, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, London (2011); https://books.google.com.mx/books?hl=es&lr=&id=SOF6ZQfxulUC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=Structures+for+Nuclear+Facilities:+Analysis,+Design,+and+Construction&ots=7rJasJISJX&sig=-nQbX8eQXlz8MEmaBVsXqMJ9d40#v=onepage&q=Structures%20for%20Nuclear%20Facilities%3A%20Analysis%2C%20Design%2C%20and%20Construction&f=false (accessed July 5, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• E. HERNÁNDEZ-PALAFOX et al., “Analysis of an Aircraft Impact on a Dry Storage Cask of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” Engineering Design Application III: Structures, Materials and Processes, A. ÖCHSNER and H. ALTENBACH, Eds., pp. 91–102, Springer International Publishing (2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39062-4_9.
   Google Scholar
• “Module 02: Introduction to Explicit Dynamics—Introduction to ANSYS Explicit Dynamics,” Customer Training Material, pp. 1–62, ANSYS, Inc. (2019).
   Google Scholar
• S. W. WOODWARD and M. R. SPRINGMAN, “The Evolution of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage. Policy and Technology in the US,” World Nuclear & Radiation, Information of Holtec International, Seoul, Korea (June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• “ Task Order 16: Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” U.S. Department of Energy (2015); https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/10/f33/to16-final-report_0.pdf (accessed Oct. 30, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• “Aircraft Specifications,” Delta Cargo (2018); https://www.deltacargo.com/Cargo/catalog/aircraft-specification?from=home (accessed Oct. 29, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• S. HALE, “Why Worry about Hourglassing in Explicit Dynamics? Part 1 2015,” Forbrukslånsiden.com (2015); https://caeai.com/blog/why-worry-about-hourglassing-explicit-dynamics-part-i (accessed Oct. 10, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• “A Pilot Probabilistic Risk Assessment of a Dry Cask Storage System at a Nuclear Power Plant,” NUREG-1864, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2007); https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0713/ML071340012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• “Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems at a General License Facility: Final Report,” NUREG-1536 Rev. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2010); https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1010/ML101040620.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• “Spent Fuel Transportation Risk Assessment: Final Report,” NUREG-2125, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2014); https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1403/ML14031A323.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• “Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Division 3: Containments for Transportation and Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High Level Radioactive Material and Waste—Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2010).
   Google Scholar
• P. BECKER, N. NIGRO, and S. IDELSOHN, “Explicit Time Integration with Large Time Steps for the Heat Flow Equations,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Calculation Des. Eng., 28, 187 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rimni.2012.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• C. O’SULLIVAN and J. D. BRAY, “Selecting a Suitable Time Step for Discrete Element Simulations that Use the Central Difference Time Integration Scheme,” Eng. Comput., 21, 2/3/4, 278 (2004); http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02644400410519794.
   Google Scholar
• M. T. ISLAM and E. A. SINGH, “Study of Behavior of RCC Beam Under Impact Loading and Effect of Hourglass Energy by Finite Element Analysis Using ANSYS,” IJERT, 8, 7, 2278 (2019); http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV8IS070027.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS Explicit Dynamics Analysis Guide, pp. 131–140, ANSYS, Inc. (2019).
   Google Scholar
• R. C. HIBBELER, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed., Pearson Education, Inc. (2017).
   Google Scholar
• “304 Stainless Steel,” MatWeb (2019); https://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=abc4415b0f8b490387e3c922237098da.
   Google Scholar
• “Zircaloy-2 Zirconium Alloy,” MatWeb (2019); http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=eb1dad5ce1ad4a1f9e92f86d5b44740d.
   Google Scholar
• “Aluminum 5083-H116; 5083-H321,” MatWeb (2019); http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=1efe7441a72f4a22a53c0dc1bd9c87ec.
   Google Scholar
• E. BUTKOV, Mathematical Physics, Addison-Wesley Publishing (1973).
   Google Scholar
• D. G. ZILL, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 7th ed., Jones & Bartlett Learning (2020).
   Google Scholar
• H. D. YOUNG and R. A. FREEDMAN, University Physics with Modern Physics, 15th ed., Pearson (2020).
   Google Scholar
• M. ABDEL-KADER, “Modified Settings of Concrete Parameters in RHT Model for Predicting the Response of Concrete Panels to Impact,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 132, 103312 (2019); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Workshop 05.3: Drop Test on Reinforced Concrete—Introduction to ANSYS Explicit Dynamics,” Customer Training Material, pp. 1–24, ANSYS, Inc. (2016).
   Google Scholar