Development of a Surrogate System of a Plant Dynamics Simulation Model and an Abnormal Situation Identification System for Nuclear Power Plants Using Deep Neural Networks

References

• T. TAKEDA et al., “Development of Analytical Code ‘ACCORD’ for Incore and Plant Dynamics of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor,” JAERI-Data/Code, 032, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (1996).
   Google Scholar
• M. HIRANO and K. HADA, “Development of THYDE-HTGR: Computer Code for Transient Thermal-Hydraulics of High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor,” JAERI-M-90-071, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Y. SHIMAKAWA et al., “The Plant Dynamics Analysis Code ASURA for the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR),” Proc. Specialists’ Mtg. Uncertainties in Physics Calculations for Gas Cooled Reactor Cores, Villigen, Switzerland, May 9–11, 1990, p. 59, International Atomic Energy Agency (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Y. LECUN, Y. BENGIO, and G. HINTON, “Deep Learning,” Nature, 521, 436 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. F. XIAO and T. TATSUOKI, “Asymmetric Abel Inversion by Neural Network for Reconstruction of Plasma Density Distribution,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A, 492 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. ALI, F. MAKOTO, and T. TATSUOKI, “Optimal Estimation of Parameters of Dynamical Systems by Neural Network Collocation Method,” Comput. Phys. Commun., 150 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. GOMEZ-FERNANDEZ et al., “Status of Research and Development of Learning-Based Approaches in Nuclear Science and Engineering: A Review,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 359, 110479 (2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110479 (accessed Aug. 10, 2023).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SUMAN, “Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Industry: Chimera or Solution?” J. Cleaner Prod., 278, 124022 (2021); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124022 (accessed July 14, 2023).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. HUANG et al., “A Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Nuclear Reactors: Where We Are and What’s Next,” Heliyon, 9, e13883 (2023); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13883 (accessed July 14, 2023).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. TAKEDA et al., “Analytical Evaluation on Loss of Off-Site Electric Power Simulation of the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor,” JAERI-Research 2000-016, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (2000).
   Google Scholar
• S. NAKAGAWA et al., “Safety Demonstration Tests Using High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 233, 1–3, 301 (2004); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SAITO et al., “Design of High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR),” JAERI 1332, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (1994).
   Google Scholar
• R. BEALE and T. JACKSON, Neural Computing: An Introduction, IOP Publishing Ltd. (1990).
   Google Scholar
• B. XU et al., “Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolution Network,” arXiv:1505.00853v2 (2015); https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.00853.pdf (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• P. GOYAL et al., “Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hour,” arXiv:1706.02677v2 (2018); https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.02677.pdf (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• L. BALLES and P. HENNIG, “Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradients,” arXiv:1705.07774v4 (2020); https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.07774.pdf (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Y. BENGIO, N. B. LEWANDOWSKI, and R. PASCANU, “Advances in Optimizing Recurrent Networks,” arXiv:1212.0901 (2012); https://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.0901.pdf (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• A. GRAVES, “Generating Sequences with Recurrent Neural Networks,” arXiv:1308.0850v5 (2014); https://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.0850.pdf (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• J. DUCHI, E. HAZAN, and Y. SINGER, “Adaptive Subgradient Methods for Online Learning and Stochastic Optimization,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2121 (2011); https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume12/duchi11a/duchi11a.pdf (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. BOTTOU, Online Algorithms and Stochastic Approximations, Online Learning and Neural Networks, Cambridge University Press (1998).
   Google Scholar
• D. P. KINGMA and J. L. BA, “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980v8 (2015); https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.6980v8.pdf (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• I. LOSHCHILOV and F. HUTTER, “Fixing Weight Decay Regularization in Adam” (2018); https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.05101v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• S. J. REDDI, S. KALE, and S. KUMAR, “On the Convergence of Adam and Beyond,” Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Learning Representations, Vancouver, Canada, April 30–May 3, 2018, (2018); https://openreview.net/pdf?id=ryQu7f-RZ ( accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• L. LUO et al., “Adaptive Gradient Methods with Dynamic Bound of Learning Rate,” Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Learning Representations, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 6–9, 2019; https://openreview.net/pdf?id=Bkg3g2R9FX (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “RMSprop Loses to SMORMS3,” The Evolution of Cybernetics; https://sifter.org/~simon/journal/20150420.html (accessed Mar. 18, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• S. TOKUI et al., “Chainer: A Next-Generation Open Source Framework for Deep Learning,” Proc. 29th Annual Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, Canada, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• N. SHIMADA, Deep Learning with Chainer, p. 61, Gijutsu-Hyohron (Sep. 14, 2017).
   Google Scholar