Students’ situational engagement and its association with overall engagement: the application of the InSitu instrument in the context of a Norwegian lower secondary school

References

• Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J.-S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, J. (2012). Issues and methods in the measurement of student engagement: Advancing the construct through statistical modeling. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 783–803). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_38.
   Google Scholar
• Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). Nordic schools in a time of change. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The nordic education model. Policy implications of research in education (Vol. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3_1.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen, & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bru, E., Stornes, T., Munthe, E., & Thuen, E. (2010). Students’ perceptions of teacher support across the transition from primary to secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(6), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2010.522842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bru, E., Virtanen, T., Kjetilstad, V., & Niemiec, C. P. (2019). Gender differences in the strength of association between perceived support from teachers and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1659404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Curran, P. J., & Kirby, J. B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0049124101029004003
   Google Scholar
• Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar, & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development (pp. 43–77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, T. (2016). Relationships: The key to student engagement. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijel
   Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 416–437). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., & Wang, M.-T. (2012). Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_6.
   Google Scholar
• Ertesvåg, S. K., Sammons, P., & Blossing, U. (2020). Integrating data in a complex mixed-methods classroom interaction study. British Educational Research Journal, 47, https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, J. D., & Owings, J. (2006). The adult lives of at-risk students: the roles of attainment and engagement in high school–statistical analysis report. DIANE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019). Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Cappella, E., Atkins, M., Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/669616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havik, T., & Westergård, E. (2019). Do teachers matter? Students’ perceptions of classroom interactions and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, K. L., Knight, K. E., & Thornberry, T. P. (2012). School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, delinquency, and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9665-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen, & S. J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–316). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., Hatzichristou, C., Polychroni, F., Basnett, J., Duck, R., Farrell, P., Liu, Y., Negovan, V., Shin, H., Stanculescu, E., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H., & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerkkanen, M. K., Vasalampi, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2012). Insituations (InSitu) instrument. University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, G., Xie, K., & Liu, Q. (2022). What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: Perception of the learning environment and students’ motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand, G., & Skinner, E. A. (2007). Motivational dynamics of children’s academic help-seeking and concealment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Mansour, M., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2020). What factors influence students’ real-time motivation and engagement? An experience sampling study of high school students using mobile technology. Educational Psychology, 40(9), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1545997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., Ginns, P., Malmberg, L.-E., Collie, R. J., & Calvo, R. A. (2015). Real-time motivation and engagement during a month at school: Every moment of every day for every student matters. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., Goetz, T., Malmberg, L.-E., Pekrun, R., Tanaka, A., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Within-person analysis in educational psychology: Importance and illustrations. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 12, 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Pöysä, S. (2020). Students’ situational engagement in lower secondary school: Association with overall engagement and contextual factors. [Doctoral dissertation, JYU]. JUX Digital Repository. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/72391.
   Google Scholar
• Pöysä, S., Poikkeus, A.-M., Muotka, J., Vasalampi, K., & Lerkkanen, M.-K. (2020). Adolescents’ engagement profiles and their association with academic performance and situational engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 82, 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöysä, S., Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2018). Variation in situation-specific engagement among lower secondary school students. Learning and Instruction, 53, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöysä, S., Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2019). Teacher-student interaction and lower secondary school students’ situational engagement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsen, K. M. (2012). Part V commentary: Possible new directions in the measurement of student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_39.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience development. In K. Wentzel & D. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 145–168). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Symonds, J. E., Kaplan, A., Upadyaya, K., Salmela-Aro, K., Torsney, B. M., Skinner, E., & Eccles, J. S. (2021). Momentary engagement as a complex dynamic system. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fuy7p.
   Google Scholar
• van Braak, M., van de Pol, J., Poorthuis, A. M., & Mainhard, T. (2021). A micro-perspective on students’ behavioral engagement in the context of teachers’ instructional support during seatwork: Sources of variability and the role of teacher adaptive support. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, 101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Malmberg, L.-E., Aunola, K., & Lerkkanen, M.-K. (2021). Intra-individual dynamics of lesson-specific engagement: Lagged and cross-lagged effects from one lesson to the next. British Journal of Educational Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Pöysä, S., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2016). Assessment of students’ situation-specific classroom engagement by an InSitu Instrument. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veland, J., Midthassel, U. V., & Idsoe, T. (2009). Perceived socio-economic status and social inclusion in school: Interactions of disadvantages. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(6), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830903301994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., Degol, J. L., & Henry, D. A. (2019). An integrative development-in-sociocultural-context model for children’s engagement in learning. American Psychologist, 74(9), 1086–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar