55
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does it Appear to ‘Resemble’ Reality? on the Ethics of Psychoanalytic Writing

Pages 105-134 | Received 07 Sep 2023, Accepted 08 Sep 2023, Published online: 05 Apr 2024

REFERENCES

  • Allen, W. (1991). The Kugelmass episode. In The Complete Prose of Woody Allen: Without Feathers, Getting Even, Side Effects. New York: Wings Books, pp. 345–360.
  • Barthes, R. (2002). The Neutral. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 2005.
  • Bion, W. R. (1967). Second Thoughts: Selected Papers on Psycho-Analysis. London: Heinemann.
  • Bion, W. R. (1975). The Dream. In A Memoir of the Future. London: Karnac, 1991, pp. 1–217.
  • Blanchot, M. (1969). The Infinite Conversation. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. Minnesota Press, 2003.
  • Civitarese, G. (2008). More affects…more eyes: on postmodern issues and deconstruction(s) in analysis. In The Intimate Room, London: Routledge, 2010, pp. 155–179.
  • Civitarese, G. (2010). Ogden’s parentheses, or the continuity between conscious and unconscious experience. In Playing and Vitality in Psychoanalysis, ed. G. Civitarese & A. Ferro. London: Routledge, 2022, pp.121–132.
  • Civitarese, G. (2011). From the mystic writing pad to a function: metaphors of text and translation in Freud and Bion. In The Violence of Emotions, trans. I. Harvey. London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 173–190.
  • Civitarese, G. (2016). Dora: the postscripts. Italian Psychoanal. Annual, 10:79–95.
  • Civitarese, G. (2017). Aesthetics and writing in psychoanalysis. In Playing and Vitality in Psychoanalysis, G. Civitarese & A. Ferro. London: Routledge, 2022, pp. 174–87.
  • Civitarese, G. (2019) On Bion’s concepts of negative capability and faith. Psychoanal. Q., 88:751–783.
  • Civitarese, G. (2021). The limits of interpretation. A reading of Bion’s “On Arrogance.” Int. J. Psychoanal., 102:236–257.
  • Civitarese, G. (2021a). Intersubjectivity and the analytic field. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 69:853–894.
  • Civitarese, G. (2021b). Symmetry and asymmetry in the analytic process: reply to commentaries. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 69:921–935.
  • Civitarese, G. (2022a). Psychoanalytic Field Theory: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge.
  • Civitarese, G. (2022b). On the word’s work, J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 70:1235–1238.
  • Civitarese, G. (2022c). On Arrogance: A Psychoanalytic Essay. London: Routledge 2024, in press.
  • Civitarese, G. (2023). Intercorporeity, un-distancing, and aura in Skype analysis. Psychoanal. Q., 92:223–261.
  • Felski, R. (2015). The Limits of Critique. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press.
  • Freud, S. (1905 [1901]). Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria (Dora). S. E., 7.
  • Freud, S. (1915). The Unconscious. S. E., 14.
  • Freud, S. (1925). A Note Upon the ‘Mystic Writing-Pad’. S. E., 19.
  • Freud, S. (1926). The Question of Lay Analysis. S. E., 20.
  • Gabbard, G. O. & Williams, P. (2001). Preserving confidentiality in the writing of case reports. Int. J. Psychoanal., 82:1067–1068.
  • Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and Time. Albany, New York: State Univ. New York Press, 1996.
  • Heidegger, M. (1971). What are poets for. In Poetry, Language, Thought: Selected Essays. New York: Harper & Row, 2001.
  • Isaacs, S. (1948). The nature and function of phantasy. Int. J. Psychoanal., 29:73–97.
  • Jaspers, K. (1959). General Psychopathology, vol. I-II. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Univ. Press, 1997.
  • Jullien, F. (2013). De l’intime. Loin du bruyant Amour [About Intimacy: Far from the Noisy Love]. Paris: Grasset.
  • Kernberg, O. (1986). Institutional problems of psychoanalytic education. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 34:799–834.
  • Mallarmé, S. (2006). Sea breeze. In Collected Poems and Other Verse. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press, 1968.
  • Moran, D. & Cohen, J. (2012). Horizon (Horizont). In The Husserl Dictionary. New York: Continuum, pp. 147–48.
  • Morin, M. -E. (2022). Merleau-Ponty and Nancy on Sense and Being: At the Limits of Phenomenology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
  • Nancy, J. -L. (1966). Being Singular Plural. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
  • Ogden, T. H. (2005). On psychoanalytic supervision. Int. J. Psychoanal., 86:1265–1280.
  • Penrose, R. (1958). Picasso: His Life and Work. Berkeley, CA: Univ. California Press, 1981.
  • Pietrantonio, V. (2018). Memories of the future, realisations in the present. The oneiric destiny of pre-conceptions that turn up in the minds of dreamers. In Bion and Contemporary Psychoanalysis: Reading A Memoir of the Future, ed. G. Civitarese. London: Routledge, pp. 101–109.
  • Proust, M. (2012). Écriture. In Quatre Conférences, ed. C. Simon. Paris: Minuit.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1965). Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1977.
  • Roth, P. (1969). Portnoy’s Complaint. New York: Random House.
  • Svevo, I. (1923). Zeno’s Conscience. London: Penguin Classics, 2002.
  • Tuckett, D. (2000). Reporting clinical events in the journal: towards the constructing of a special case. Int J Psychoanal., 81:1065–69.
  • Yates, P., director. The Dresser, U. S., 1983.
  • Zahavi, D. (2019). Husserl’s Legacy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.