Administrative and organizational capacities of civil society in EU Cohesion Policy

REFERENCES

• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Oraže, H. (2014). From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Batory, A., & Cartwright, A. (2011). Re-visiting the partnership principle in Cohesion Policy: The role of civil society organizations in Structural Funds monitoring. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(4), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, W. (2011). Financial capacity and sustainability of ordinary nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.20039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2018). Definitions of co-production and co-creation. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 9–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030601022874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R. (2018). Cohesion policies and the creation of a European identity: The role of territorial identity. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(3), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmin, J. (2010). NGO capacity and environmental governance in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica, 45(1–2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2009.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepiku, D., Mussari, R., & Giordano, F. (2016). Local governments managing austerity: Approaches, determinants and impact. Public Administration, 94(1), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, A. (2019). Inside co-production: Stakeholder meaning and situated practice. Social Policy & Administration, 53(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. (2013). Europeanizing sub-national governance: Partnership in the implementation of European Union Structural Funds in Poland. Regional Studies, 47(8), 1363–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.628931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2004). Project cycle management guidelines. https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/methodology-aid-delivery-methods-project-cycle-management-200403_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). The European code of conduct on partnership in the framework of the European Structural and Investment Funds. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0240&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Falanga, R. (2018). Critical trends of citizen participation in policymaking. Insights from Portugal. In M. C. Lobo, F. C. da Silva, & J. P. Zúquete (Eds.), Changing societies: Legacies and challenges. Vol. II: Citizenship in crisis (pp. 295–318). Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrão, J., & Campos, V. (2015). O Ordenamento em Portugal. Uma perspectiva genealógica.
   Google Scholar
• Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. (2015). Diagnóstico das ONG em Portugal. https://content.gulbenkian.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/29195743/PCA_DiagnosticoONGPortugal2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuster, J. E. (2006). Comparison of the European Commission’s project cycle management/logical framework approach with international PM standards and methodologies: PMBOK, IPMA’s ICB, ISO 10,006, PRINCE2 and TenStep. Paper presented at the PMI® Global Congress 2006—EMEA, Madrid, Spain, June 9, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• GCNNO. (2008). Zhodnocení koncepce podpory rozvoje neziskového sektoru. http://www.vlada.cz/assets/ppov/rnno/dokumenty/zhodnoceni_koncepce_pro_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• González, A., Daly, G., Pinch, P., Adams, N., Valtenbergs, V., Burns, M. C., & Johannesson, H. (2015). Indicators for spatial planning and territorial cohesion: Stakeholder-driven selection approach for improving usability at regional and local levels. Regional Studies, 49(9), 1588–1602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1018883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, C. (2019). How politics matters for EU funds’ absorption problems – A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(2), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1398774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, M. A., & Brudney, J. L. (2011). Problems recruiting volunteers: Nature versus nurture. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.20046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haski-Leventhal, D., Meijs, L. C. P. M., Lockstone-Binney, L., Holmes, K., & Oppenheimer, M. (2018). Measuring volunteerability and the capacity to volunteer among non-volunteers: Implications for social policy. Social Policy & Administration, 52(5), 1139–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. (2010). Civil society in the old and new member states. European Societies, 12(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2010.483008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenmeier, J., Seemann, A.-K., Potluka, O., & von Schnurbein, G. (2021). Co-production as a driver of client satisfaction with public service organizations: An analysis of German day-care centres. Public Management Review, 23(2), 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1674366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, M., Teasdale, S., Calò, F., & Roy, M. J. (2020). Co-production and the third sector: Conceptualising different approaches to service user involvement. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1265–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1630135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., & van der Zwet, A. (2020a). Evaluating integrated sustainable urban development strategies: A methodological framework applied in Portugal. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1606898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., & Van der Zwet, A. (2020b). Sustainable and integrated urban planning and governance in metropolitan and medium-sized cities? Sustainability, 12(15), 5976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milio, S. (2007). Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from Structural Funds implementation in southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milio, S. (2008). How political stability shapes administrative performance: The Italian case. West European Politics, 31(5), 915–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802234581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2003). Open government: Fostering dialogue with civil society. OECD Publications Service.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). OECD territorial reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Pantouvakis, J.-P. (2017). How can IPMA contribute to new PM2 EU Commission Standard? Paper presented at the 12th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, Lviv, Ukraine, September 5–8, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Polverari, L., & Michie, R. (2009). New partnership dynamics in a changing Cohesion Policy context. IQ-Net Thematic Paper. http://www.eprc.strath.ac.uk/iqnet/downloads/IQ-Net_Reports28Public29/ThematicPaper2528229Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Potluka, O. (2021). Roles of formal and informal leadership: Civil society leadership interaction with political leadership in local development. In M. Sotarauta, & A. Beer (Eds.), Handbook of city and regional leadership (pp. 91–107). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Potluka, O., Kalman, J., Musiałkowska, I., & Idczak, P. (2019). Civic engagement in local politics in central Europe. In R. Kerley, P. T. Dunning, & J. Liddle (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of international local government (pp. 344–360). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potluka, O., Spacek, M., & von Schnurbein, G. (2017a). Impact of the EU Structural Funds on financial capacities of non-profit organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(5), 2200–2223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9845-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potluka, O., & Svecova, L. (2019). The effects of external financial support on the capacities of educational nonprofit organizations. Sustainability, 11(17), 4593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potluka, O., Špaček, M., & Remr, J. (2017b). NGOs as partners: Obstacles in the EU Cohesion Policy? Ekonomický časopis, 65(8), 715–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potuček, M. (1999). Havel versus Klaus: Public policy making in the Czech Republic. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876989908412622.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Haddock, M. A. (2017). Explaining civil society development: A social origins approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockmann, R., Meyer, W., & Taube, L. (2020). The institutionalization of evaluation in Europe: A synthesis. In R. Stockmann, W. Meyer, & L. Taube (Eds.), The institutionalisation of evaluation in Europe (pp. 483–522). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sundeen, R. A., Raskoff, S. A., & Garcia, M. C. (2007). Differences in perceived barriers to volunteering to formal organizations: Lack of time versus lack of interest. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.150
   Google Scholar
• Surubaru, N.-C. (2017). Administrative capacity or quality of political governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the new Europe, 2007–13. Regional Studies, 51(6), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNS Political & Social. (2013). Flash Eurobarometer 373: Europeans’ engagement in participatory democracy. http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/fl373—report-final-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. & AidWatch Canada (2013). Working with civil society in foreign aid: Possibilities for south–south cooperation? https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/documents/partners/civil_society/publications/2013_UNDP-CH-Working-With-Civil-Society-in-Foreign-Aid_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2014). Absorption of regional funds: A comparative analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling-Schönhofer, H., Hamza, C., Radzyner, A., Bachter, J., Kah, S., & Mendez, C. (2014). Implementation of Cohesion Policy 2014–2020: Preparations and administrative capacity of member states. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201410/20141028ATT92010/20141028ATT92010EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vamstad, J. (2012). Co-production and service quality: The case of cooperative childcare in Sweden. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1173–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9312-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zwet, A., Bachtler, J., Ferry, M., McMaster, I., & Miller, S. (2017). Integrated territorial and urban strategies: How are ESIF adding value in 2014–2020? https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/integrated_strategies/integrated_strategies_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• von Schnurbein, G. (2014). Same same but different: Managerial influences on organisational performance in foundations and associations. Journal of Business Economics, 84(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0697-x
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. N., Kang, S.-C., & Johnson, J. (2016). (Co)-contamination as the dark side of co-production: Public value failures in co-production processes. Public Management Review, 18(5), 692–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar