The quality of government and administrative performance: explaining Cohesion Policy compliance, absorption and achievements across EU regions

REFERENCES

• Aivazidou, E., Cunico, G. & Mollona, E. (2020) Beyond the EU Structural Funds’ absorption rate: How Do regions really perform? Economies, 8(3), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8030055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Begg, I., Charles, D., & Polverari, L. (2016b). EU Cohesion Policy in practice: What does it achieve? Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Ferry, M. (2015). Conditionalities and the performance of European Structural Funds: A principal–agent analysis of control mechanisms in European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1258–1273. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.821572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J. & Mendez, C. (2010) Review and assessment of simplification measures in Cohesion Policy 2007–2013. Report to the European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J. & Mendez, C. (2020a) Cohesion and the EU budget: Is conditionality undermining solidarity? in R. Coman, A. Crespy & V.A. Schmidt (Eds.), Governance and politics in the post-crisis European Union (pp. 121–139). Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/3hUjYsW
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Mendez, C. (2020b). Cohesion Policy: doing more with less. In H. Wallace, M. Pollack, A. Young, & C. Roederer-Rynning (Eds.), Policymaking in the European Union (pp. 233–253). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Oraže, H. (2014). From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 735–757. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.772744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Wishlade, F. (2016a). Evolution or revolution? Exploring new ideas for Cohesion Policy 2020+ (EoRPA Paper No. 16/4). European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Wishlade, F. (2017). Reshaping the EU budget and Cohesion Policy: Carrying on, doing less, doing more or radical redesign? (EoRPA Paper No. 17/5). European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Polverari, L., Oraže, H., Clement, K., Tödtling-Schönhofer, H., & Gross, F. (2009). Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2000–2006 co-financed by ERDF: Management and implementation systems for Cohesion Policy (Final Report to the European Commission (DG REGIO)), European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtrögler, J., & Oberhofer, H. (2018). Euroscepticism and EU Cohesion Policy: The impact of micro-level policy effectiveness on voting behavior (Working Paper Series No. 273). Department of Economics, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
   Google Scholar
• Bahr, C. (2008). How does sub-national autonomy affect the effectiveness of structural funds? Kyklos, 61(1), 3–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.2008.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, DG Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Baun, M., & Marek, D. (2017). The limits of regionalization: The intergovernmental struggle over EU Cohesion Policy in the Czech republic. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 31(4), 863–884. doi:10.1177/0888325417720717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & von Ehrlich, M. (2013). Absorptive capacity and the growth and investment Effects of regional transfers: A regression discontinuity design with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 29–77. doi:10.1257/pol.5.4.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cace, C., Cace, S., Lova, C., & Nicoleascu, V. (2009). Absorption capacity of the Structural Funds. Integrating perspectives. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 27, 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, S., Nicholson-Crotty, S., & Fisher, E. J. (2015). Capacity, guidance, and the implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 113–125. doi:10.1111/puar.12294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2015). Mapping the regional divide in Europe: A measure for assessing quality of government in 206 European regions. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 315–346. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2013). Why do some regions in Europe have a higher quality of government? The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 567–582. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, B. K., & Gerber, B. J. (2008). Taken for Granted? Managing for social equity in grant programs. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1128–1141. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00960.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., & Giua, M. (2016). The EU Cohesion Policy in context: Does a bottom-up approach work in all regions? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(11), 2340–2357. doi:10.1177/0308518X16658291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cribari-Neto, F., & Zeileis, A. (2010). Beta regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 34(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v034.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S., & Polverari, L. (2011). Financial accountability and European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 45(5), 695–706. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.529118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derthick, M. (1970). The influence of federal grants: Public assistance in Massachusetts. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ederveen, S., de Groot, H. L. F., & Nahuis, R. (2006). Fertile soil for Structural Funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy. Kyklos: International Review for Social Sciences, 59(10), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ederveen, S., Gorter, J., de Mooij, R., & Nahuis, R. (2002). Funds and games: The economics of European Cohesion Policy (Occasional Paper No. 3/October). European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes.
   Google Scholar
• Elazar, D. J. (1984). American federalism: A view from the states (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• EPRC & EUROREG. (2010). The objective of economic and social cohesion in the economic policies of member states. (Report to DG REGIO, European Policies Research Centre. (University of Strathclyde and EUROREG, University of Warsaw.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2000). Implementation of the performance reserve (Methodological Working Documents, Working Paper No. 4). DG REGIO.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Cohesion Policy: Strategic report 2013 on programme implementation 2007–2013 (COM(2013) 210 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014a). Investment for jobs and growth; Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities (Sixth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion). Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014b). Guidance fiche performance framework review and reserve in 2014–2020 (May). DG REGIO.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017a). My region, my Europe, our future: Seventh Cohesion Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017b). White Paper on the future of Europe: Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025 (COM(2017)2025, final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017c). Competitiveness in low-income and low-growth regions: The lagging regions report (Commission Staff Working Document NO. SWD(2017) 132 final).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Good governance for Cohesion Policy: Administrative capacity building, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/how/improving-investment/admin_capacity_building_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2022). Cohesion in Europe towards 2050 (Eighth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion). Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee of the Regions. (2018). Administrative capacity of local and regional authorities: Opportunities and challenges for structural reforms and a more effective European economic governance. https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/studies/Documents/Administrative-capacity/AdminCapacity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2010). Council Regulation (EU) No 539/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund as regards simplification of certain requirements and as regards certain provisions relating to financial management (24 July).
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, M. (2017). Assessing the quality of government at the regional level using public procurement data (European Commission Working Papers No. WP 12/2017). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/working-papers/2017/assessing-the-quality-of-government-at-the-regional-level-using-public-procurement-data
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, M., & Czibik, A. (2021). Measuring regional quality of government: The public spending quality index based on government contracting data. Regional Studies, 55(8), 1459–1472. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1902975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, S., & Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(7), 799–815. doi:10.1080/0266476042000214501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamkhar, S., & Pickerill, J. M. (2012). The state of American federalism 2011–2012: A fend for yourself and activist form of bottom-up federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42(3), 357–386. doi:10.1093/publius/pjs027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, C. (2019a). How politics matters for EU funds’ absorption problems – A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(2), 188–206. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1398774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, C. (2019b). EU funds in the new member states. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2008). Assessing local capacity for Federal grant-getting. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(4), 463–479. doi:10.1177/0275074007311385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, D. M. (2008). Strengthening the intergovernmental grant system: Long-term lessons for the federal–local relationship. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 126–136. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00842.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. (2000). National adaptation to European integration: The importance of institutional veto points. Journal of Public Policy, 20(1), 83–103. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00000763
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (1996). The accommodation of diversity in European policy-making and its outcomes: Regulatory policy as a patchwork. Journal of European Public Policy, 3(2), 149–167. doi:10.1080/13501769608407026
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Niedzwiecki, S., Chapman, C., & Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring regional authority: A postfunctional theory of governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Incaltarau, C., Pascariu, G. C., & Surubaru, N.-C. (2020). Evaluating the determinants of EU funds absorption across old and new member states – The role of administrative capacity and political governance. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 941–961. doi:10.1111/jcms.12995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, E. T., Hall, J. L., & Zhang, Z. (2012). The American recovery and reinvestment act and state accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 527–549. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576350308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersan-Škabić, I., & Tijanić, L. (2017). Regional absorption capacity of EU funds. Economic Research, 30(1), 1191–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1340174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG & PROGNOS. (2016). Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2007–2013, focusing on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF) – Delivery System, WP12 (Final Report to the European Commission (DG REGIO)).
   Google Scholar
• Manna, P., & Ryan, L. L. (2011). Competitive grants and educational federalism: President Obama’s Race to the Top program in theory and practice. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(3), 522–546. doi:10.1093/publius/pjr021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (1993). Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(4), 634–663. doi:10.2307/3325344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbaye, H. A. D. (2001). Why national states comply with supranational law explaining implementation infringements in the European Union, 1972–1993. European Union Politics, 2(3), 259–281. doi:10.1177/1465116501002003001
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. A. (2006). Incentives, capacity, and implementation: Evidence from Massachusetts education reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 45–65. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, C. (2011). The Lisbonization of EU Cohesion Policy: A successful case of experimentalist governance? European Planning Studies, 19(3), 519–537. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., & Bachtler, J. (2011). Administrative reform and unintended consequences: An assessment of the EU Cohesion Policy ‘audit explosion’. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(5), 746–765. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.586802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., & Bachtler, J. (2017). Financial compliance in the European Union: A cross-national assessment of financial correction patterns and causes in Cohesion Policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3), 569–592. doi:10.1111/jcms.12502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., & Kah, S. (2009). Programme implementation in times of economic crisis: Review of programme implementation winter 2008–spring 2009 (IQ-Net Review Paper 24(1)). European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., Mendez, F., Triga, V., & Carrascosa, J. M. (2020). EU cohesion policy in the media spotlight: Exploring territorial and temporal patterns in news coverage and tone. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 1034–1055. doi:10.1111/jcms.13016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milio, S. (2007). Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from Structural Funds implementation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41(4), 429–442. doi:10.1080/00343400601120213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muringani, J., Dahl Fitjar, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2019). Decentralisation, quality of government and economic growth in the regions of the EU. Revista de Economía Mundial, 51, 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2015). Using grants to achieve public purposes. In J. L. Perry, & R. K. Christensen (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (3rd ed., pp. 197–214). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Investing together: Working effectively across levels of government (OECD Multi-Level Governance Studies). OECD Publ. http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264197022-en
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). Recommendation of the Council on effective public investment across levels of government. OECD Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Improving productivity and inclusion at national and subnational levels: How can effective public governance help? (Note by the Secretary-General, Background Document for meeting of the Council at ministerial level, 1–2 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Rethinking regional development policy-making (OECD Multi-level Governance Studies). OECD Publ. http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264293014-en
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. (1995). Regional actors in an intergovernmental play: The making and implementation of EC structural policy. The State of the European Union, 3, 361–390.
   Google Scholar
• Polverari, L. (2015). Does devolution increase accountability? Empirical evidence from the implementation of European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(6), 1074–1086. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.1001351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673–706. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of Cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274–1290. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Ketterer, T. (2020). Institutional change and the development of lagging regions in Europe. Regional Studies, 54(7), 974–986. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1608356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2012). Is Europeanisation through conditionality sustainable? Lock-in of institutional change after EU accession. West European Politics, 35(1), 20–38. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.631311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737019002185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. (2006). Turning swift policy-making into deadlock and delay: National policy coordination and the transposition of EU directives. European Union Politics, 7(3), 293–319. doi:10.1177/1465116506066258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surubaru, N.-C. (2017). Administrative capacity or quality of political governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the new Europe, 2007–13. Regional Studies, 51(6), 844–856. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2002). European governance and supranational institutions: Making states comply. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, J. N., & Feiock, R. C. (2015). Improving outcomes in fiscal federalism: Local political leadership and administrative capacity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1059–1080. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, J. N., Kassekert, A., Feiock, R. C., & Yang, K. (2016). Walking in the shadow of Pressman and Wildavsky: Expanding fiscal federalism and goal congruence theories to single-shot games. Review of Policy Research, 33(2), 124–139. doi:10.1111/ropr.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terracciano, B., & Graziano, P. R. (2016). EU Cohesion Policy implementation and administrative capacities: Insights from Italian regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 26(3), 293–320. doi:10.1080/13597566.2016.1200033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., & Sager, F. (2017). Moving beyond legal compliance: Innovative approaches to EU multilevel implementation. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(9), 1253–1268. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1314541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiganasu, R., Incaltarau, C., & Pascariu, G. C. (2018). Administrative capacity, Structural Funds absorption and development. Evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 18(1), 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2014). Absorption of regional funds: A comparative analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 371–387. doi:10.1111/jcms.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkova, A., & Torenvlied, R. (2011). The successful transposition of European provisions by member states: Application to the framework equality directive. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(5), 690–708. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.586799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar