Administrative capacity and the territorial effects of EU support to firms: a two-step analysis

REFERENCES

• Abreu, M., DeGroot, H. L. F., & Florax, R. J. G. M. (2005). A meta-analysis of B-convergence: The legendary 2%. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 389–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascani, A., Faggian, A., & Montresor, S. (2021). The geography of COVID-19 and the structure of local economies: The case of Italy. Journal of Regional Science, 61(2), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Begg, I., Charles, D., & Polverari, L. (2016). The long-term effectiveness of EU cohesion policy: Assessing the achievements of the ERDF, 1989–2012. In J. Bachtler, P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy & T. Muravska (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy. Reassessing performance and direction (pp. 21–32). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Oraže, H. (2014). From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtrögler, J., Fratesi, U., & Perucca, G. (2020). The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 54(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1551615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtrögler, J., Hammer, C., Reuter, W. H., & Schwendinger, F. (2019). Guide to the galaxy of EU regional funds recipients: Evidence from new data. Empirica, 46(1), 103–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9427-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report for Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1991(1), 107–182. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534639
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/261816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile, L. (2016). Measuring party strategies on the territorial dimension: A method based on content analysis. Regional & Federal Studies, 26(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1141767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & Von Ehrlich, M. (2013). Absorptive capacity and the growth and investment effects of regional transfers: A regression discontinuity design with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 29–77. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.5.4.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkovskis, K., Tkacevs, O., & Yashiro, N. (2018). Do EU funds boost productivity and employment?: Firm level analysis for Latvia (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1525). OECD Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Bernini, C., & Pellegrini, G. (2011). How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondonio, D., & Greenbaum, R. T. (2006). Do business investment incentives promote employment in declining areas? Evidence from EU Objective-2 regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776406065432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdin, S., Jeanne, L., Nadou, F., & Noiret, G. (2021). Does lockdown work? A spatial analysis of the spread and concentration of COVID-19 in Italy. Regional Studies, 55(7), 1182–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1887471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2006). Territorial impact assessment (TIA): A methodological proposal. Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, 5(2), 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2009). Territorial capital and regional development. In R. Capello, & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional growth and development theories (pp. 118–132). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., Capello, R., Cerisola, S., & Fratesi, U. (2020). Fighting gravity: Institutional changes and regional disparities in the EU. Economic Geography, 96(2), 108–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1717943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, A., Castellacci, F., Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2003). The impact of regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(4), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning (CMSP). (1999). European spatial development perspective (ESDP). European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R. (2009). Undermining the principle of concentration? European Union regional policy and the socio-economic disadvantage of European regions. Regional Studies, 43(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400801932276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., Di Cataldo, M., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). Government quality and the economic returns of transport infrastructure investment in European regions. Journal of Regional Science, https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., Fratesi, U., & Monastiriotis, V. (2017). The EU cohesion policy and the factors conditioning success and failure: Evidence from 15 regions. Regions Magazine, 305(1), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2017.11868994
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., & Giua, M. (2017). Different approaches to the analysis of the EU cohesion policy. Leveraging complementarities for evidence-based policy learning. In J. Bachtler, P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy, & T. Muravska (Eds.), EU cohesion policy. Reassessing performance and direction (pp. 21–32). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., & Giua, M. (2020). One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies, 54(1), 10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’erba, S., & Fang, F. (2017). Meta-analysis of the impact of European Union structural funds on regional growth. Regional Studies, 51(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1100285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’erba, S., Guillain, R., & Le Gallo, J. (2009). Impact of structural funds on regional growth: How to reconsider a 9-year-old black box. Région et Développement, 30, 77–99.
   Google Scholar
• Darvas, Z., Collin, A. M., Mazza, J., & Midoes, C. (2019). Effectiveness of cohesion policy: Learning from the project characteristics that produce the best results. Directorate-General for Internal Policies, European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, M. L., Pereira, F., & Torres, F. (2003). Convergence among EU regions, 1990–2001. Intereconomics, 38(5), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031729
   Google Scholar
• Di Caro, P., & Fratesi, U. (2022). One policy different effects: Estimating the region-specific impacts of EU cohesion policy. Journal of Regional Science, 62(1), 307–330. doi: 10.1111/jors.12566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ederveen, S., Groot, H. L., & Nahuis, R. (2006). Fertile soil for structural funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy. Kyklos, 59(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). (2020). Territorial agenda: A future for all places (Document of the informal meeting of ministers responsible for spatial planning, territorial development and/or social cohesion, 1 December).
   Google Scholar
• Farole, T., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2011). Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1089–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U. (2016). Impact assessment of EU cohesion policy: Theoretical and empirical issues. In S. Piattoni, & L. Polverari (Eds.), Handbook on cohesion policy in the EU (pp. 443–460). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715670.00045.
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U. (2023). Regional policy: Theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., & Perucca, G. (2014). Territorial capital and the effectiveness of cohesion policies: An assessment for CEE regions. Investigaciones Regionales: Journal of Regional Research, 29, 165–191.
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., & Perucca, G. (2016). Territorial capital and EU cohesion policy. In J. Bachtler, P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy, & T. Muravska (Eds.), EU cohesion policy: Reassessing performance and direction (pp. 255–270). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., & Perucca, G. (2019). EU regional development policy and territorial capital: A systemic approach. Papers in Regional Science, 98(1), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., & Wishlade, F. G. (2017). The impact of European cohesion policy in different contexts. Regional Studies, 51(6), https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, L., & Percoco, M. (2017). The impact of European cohesion policy in urban and rural regions. Regional Studies, 51(6), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1179384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Guzzo, F., & Mieszkowski, K. (2019). Smart specialisation: What gets lost in translation from concept to practice? Regional Studies, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1607970
   Google Scholar
• Hoogstra, G. J., van Dijk, J., & Florax, R. J. G. M. (2017). Do jobs follow people or people follow jobs? A meta-analysis of Carlino–Mills studies. Spatial Economic Analysis, 12(4), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2017.1340663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incaltarau, C., Pascariu, G. C., & Surubaru, N. C. (2020). Evaluating the determinants of EU funds absorption across old and new member states – The role of administrative capacity and political governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 941–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerling, A., & Bodenstein, T. (2006). Partisan politics in regional redistribution: Do parties affect the distribution of EU structural funds across regions? European Union Politics, 7(3), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116506066264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017a). European Union cohesion policy and Spain: A territorial impact assessment. Regional Studies, 51(8), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1187719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017b). Uncovering the territorial dimension of European Union cohesion policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., & Rauhut, D. (2020). Territorial cohesion cities: A policy recipe for achieving territorial cohesion? Regional Studies, 54(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1548764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milio, S. (2007). Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from structural funds implementation in southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41(6), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120213
   Google Scholar
• Mohl, P., & Hagen, T. (2010). Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Olfert, M. R., & Tan, Y. (2015). When spatial equilibrium fails: Is place-based policy second best? Regional Studies, 49(8), 1303–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.837999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, G., Terribile, F., Tarola, O., Muccigrosso, T., & Busillo, F. (2012). Measuring the effects of European regional policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach. Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00459.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percoco, M. (2005). The impact of structural funds on the Italian Mezzogiorno, 1994–1999. Région et Développement, 21, 141–152.
   Google Scholar
• Percoco, M. (2017). The impact of European cohesion policy on regional growth: Does local economic structure matter? Regional Studies, 51(6), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1213382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieńkowski, J., & Berkowitz, P. (2015). Econometric assessments of Cohesion Policy growth effects: how to make them more relevant for policy makers? (Working Paper No. 02/2015). European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13(Spring), 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). Institutions and the fortunes of territories. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 12(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Fratesi, U. (2004). Between development and social policies: The impact of European structural funds in Objective 1 regions. Regional Studies, 38(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400310001632226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, H. (1993). Asymmetric information, liquidity constraints and Canadian investments. Canadian Journal of Economics, 26(3), 552–574. https://doi.org/10.2307/135887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotiriou, A., & Tsiapa, M. (2015). The asymmetric influence of structural funds on regional growth in Greece. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(4), 863–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15603905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surubaru, N. C. (2017). Administrative capacity or quality of political governance? EU cohesion policy in the new Europe, 2007–13. Regional Studies, 51(6), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2014). Absorption of regional funds: A comparative analysis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, A. M., Sulaima, A., & Jaafar, N. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Świątek, D., & Żuber, P. (2014). Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar