Mechanisms of metagovernance as structural challenges to levelling up in England

REFERENCES

• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames gateway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, S., Flinders, M., & Sandford, M. (2018). Territory, power and statecraft: Understanding English devolution. Regional Studies, 52(6), 853–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1360486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., Pitelis, C., & Tomlinson, P. (2018). A place-based developmental regional industrial strategy for sustainable capture of co-created value. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1521–1542. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., & Wood, M. (2017). The metagovernance of English devolution. Local Government Studies, 43(6), 966–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1359165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in modern society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, G., Pugalis, L., & Shutt, J. (2017). Leadership and systems of governance: The constraints on the scope for leadership of place-based development in sub-national territories. Regional Studies, 51(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1181261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blöchliger, H. (2013). Measuring decentralisation: The OECD fiscal decentralisation database. In J. Kim, J. Lotz, & H. Blöchliger (Eds.), Measuring fiscal decentralisation (pp. 15–35). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Carrascal-Incera, A., McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). UK interregional inequality in a historical and international comparative context. National Institute Economic Review, 253(August), R4–R17. https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2020.26
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P., & Tuckett, D. (2021). Narratives as a coordinating device for reversing regional disequilibrium. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson, S., Driffield, N., Hoole, C., & Kitsos, A. (2022). Between a rock and a hard place: Trade-offs between prosperity and inclusivity when implementing regional growth policies (Productivity Insights Paper No. 013). The Productivity Institute, University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, A., Martin, S., & St Denny, E. (2019). Can meso-governments use metagovernance tools to tackle complex policy problems? Policy & Politics, 47(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, K. (2020). ‘Germany looks like it’s still divided’: Stark gaps persist 30 years after reunification. The Guardian, 16 September.
   Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., & Pollock, R. (2019). Creating strategic couplings in global production networks: Regional institutions and lead firm investment in the Humber region, UK. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeming, C. (2017). The lost and the New ‘liberal world’ of welfare capitalism: A critical assessment of Gøsta Esping-Andersen’s the three worlds of welfare capitalism a quarter century later. Social Policy and Society, 16(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746415000676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC). (2022). Levelling up the United Kingdom (CP604). HMSO for DLUHC.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC). (2023). West Midlands Combined Authority trailblazer deeper devolution deal (15 March). DLUHC. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/west-midlands-combined-authority-trailblazer-deeper-devolution-deal/
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2016). The city-region chimera: The political economy of metagovernance failure in Britain. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(2), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsw007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, N., & Thomas, H. (2001). Qualitative interviewing. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (2nd ed, pp. 123–143). Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Gherhes, C., Brooks, C., & Vorley, T. (2020). Localism is an illusion (of power): The multi-scalar challenge of UK enterprise policy-making. Regional Studies, 54(8), 1020–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1678745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherhes, C., Hoole, C., & Vorley, T. (2022). The ‘imaginary’ challenge of remaking subnational governance: Regional identity and contested city-region-building in the UK. Regional Studies, 57(1) 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2054974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjaltema, J., Biesbroek, R., & Termeer, K. (2020). From government to governance … to meta-governance: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1760–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., & Oosterlynck, S. (2013). Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: Soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(1), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawksbee, A. (2022). Realising the potential of England’s mayors. Onward.
   Google Scholar
• Hoole, C., & Collinson, S. (2020). Prosperity, inclusivity and sustainability across UK regions. https://blog.bham.ac.uk/cityredi/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2020/04/Policy-Briefing_CHSCv2_c.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoole, C., Collinson, S., & Newman, J. (2023). England's catch-22: Institutional limitations to achieving balanced growth through devolution. Contemporary Social Science, https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2023.2203122
   Google Scholar
• Hoole, C., & Hincks, S. (2020). Performing the city-region: Imagineering, devolution and the search for legitimacy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(8), 1583–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20921207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, S., & Swinney, P. (2020). Levelling up local government in England. Centre for Cities.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2011). Metagovernance. In The SAGE Handbook Of Governance (pp. 106–23).
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2016). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, S., & Morgan, C. (2021). Shifting the balance. New Local.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., & Baldersheim, H. (2016). Measuring local autonomy in 39 countries (1990–2014). Regional & Federal Studies, 26(3), 321–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1214911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, S., Stewart, J., & Jones, G. (2018). Centralisation, devolution and the future of local government in England. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O'Brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2004). Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In I. Bache, & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 15–30). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2016). The UK regional–national economic problem. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2020). Perceptions of regional inequality and the geography of discontent: Insights from the UK. Regional Studies, 54(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1619928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molema, M., & Tomaney, J. (2019). Regional development, history and the institutional lens. In M. Molema & S. Svensson (Eds.), Regional economic development and history (pp. 21–35). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon-Smith, K., & Sandford, M. (2021). Grasping the nettle: The central–local constraints on local government funding in England. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1924249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2021). The ambiguous ideology of levelling Up. The Political Quarterly, 92(2), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Gilbert, N. (2022). The role of the private sector in subnational governance: Learning lessons from England’s local enterprise partnerships. Local Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Kenny, M. (2023). Devolving English government. Institute for Government and Bennett Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P., & Pike, A. (2019). Deal or no deal?’ Governing urban infrastructure funding and financing in the UK city deals. Urban Studies, 56(7), 1448–1476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018757394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabst, A., & Westwood, A. (2021). The politics of productivity: Institutions, governance and policy (Working Paper No. 015). The Productivity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Palese, M. (2022). Democracy made in England where next for English local government? Electoral Reform Society.
   Google Scholar
• Paun, A., Nice, A., & Rycroft, L. (2022). How metro mayors can help level up England. Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2017). Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies, 51(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1158802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., Tomaney, J., Torrisi, G., & Tselios, V. (2012). In search of the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution: Spatial disparities, spatial economic policy, and decentralisation in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10214r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitelis, C., & Runde, J. (2017). Capabilities, resources, learning and innovation: A blueprint for a post-classical economics and public policy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(3), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2015). Devolution in England, the British political tradition and the absence of consultation, consensus and consideration. Representation, 51(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2016.1165505
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). Institutions and the fortunes of territories. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 12(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Ganau, R. (2022). Institutions and the productivity challenge for European regions. Journal of Economic Geography, 22(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandford, M. (2019a). Money talks: The finances of English combined authorities. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 34(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094219839609
   Google Scholar
• Sandford, M. (2019b). Where Do You draw the line? Local administrative boundaries in England. House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Sandford, M. (2020). Giving power away? The ‘de-words’ and the downward transfer of power in mid-2010s England. Regional & Federal Studies, 30(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1640682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2017). ‘Disorganised devolution’: Reshaping metropolitan governance in England in a period of austerity. Raumforschung und Raumordnung – Spatial Research and Planning, 75(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0435-2
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theoretical approaches to metagovernance. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 169–182). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomany, J. (2016). Limits of devolution: Localism, economics and post-democracy. The Political Quarterly, 87(4), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J., & Pike, A. (2020). Levelling up? The Political Quarterly, 91(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (Eds.), (2011). Interactive policy making, Metagovernance and democracy. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, A. (2010). Debating methods: Rediscovering qualitative approaches. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science. (pp. 249–266) Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. (2013). Typologies of federalism. In J. Loughlin, J. Kincaid, & W. Swenden (Eds.), Routledge handbook of regionalism & federalism (pp. 19–33). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, A., Sensier, M., & Pike, A. (2021). Levelling up, local growth and productivity in England (Productivity Insights Paper No. 005). The Productivity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G., Enrico, O., Anna, G., & Ali Haider, Z. (2022). A very British state capitalism: Variegation, political connections and bailouts during the COVID-19 crisis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(3), 673–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar