Geography of knowledge collaboration and innovation in Schumpeterian firms

REFERENCES

• Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., & Colombelli, A. (2015). The knowledge cost function. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arranz, N., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, 28(1–2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2020). The limits to collaboration across four of the most innovative UK industries. British Journal of Management, 31(4), 830–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2022). The knowledge spillover of innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 31(6), 1329–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Caiazza, R. (2021). Start-ups, innovation and knowledge spillovers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 1995–2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09846-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., Caiazza, R., & Siegel, D. (2023). Effects of open innovation in startups: Theory and evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., Guerrero, M., & Siegel, D. S. (2022). Assessing the impact of the UK’s research excellence framework on the relationship between university scholarly output and education and regional economic growth. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 21(3), 394–421. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2021.0240
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00722.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Vivarelli, M. (1996). Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy. Small Business Economics, 8(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D., Colombelli, A., Grilli, L., Minola, T., & Rasmussen, E. (2020). Innovative start-ups and policy initiatives. Research Policy, 49(10), 104027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banal-Estañol, A., Macho-Stadler, I., & Pérez-Castrillo, D. (2018). Endogenous matching in university–industry collaboration: Theory and empirical evidence from the United Kingdom. Management Science, 64(4), 1591–1608. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battke, B., Schmidt, T. S., Stollenwerk, S., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2016). Internal or external spillovers–which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies. Research Policy, 45(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.014.
   Google Scholar
• Baù, M., Chirico, F., Pittino, D., Backman, M., & Klaesson, J. (2019). Roots to grow: Family firms and local embeddedness in rural and urban contexts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 360–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., & Prügl, R. (2018). Family firm reputation and humanization: Consumers and the trust advantage of family firms under different conditions of brand familiarity. Family Business Review, 31(4), 460–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518792692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belitski, M., Korosteleva, J., & Piscitello, L. (2023). Digital affordances and entrepreneurial dynamics: New evidence from European regions. Technovation, 119, 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belitski, M., & Mariani, M. (2023). The effect of knowledge collaboration on business model reconfiguration. European Management Journal, 41(2), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., Eriksson, J., & Wincent, J. (2010). Co-opetition dynamics – An outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness Review, 20(2), 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/10595421011029893
   Google Scholar
• Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, 120–135.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.975
   Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2012). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, R., Czarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K. (2014). Sources of spillovers for imitation and innovation. Research Policy, 43(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carree, M., Malva, A. D., & Santarelli, E. (2014). The contribution of universities to growth: Empirical evidence for Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9282-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassia, L., Colombelli, A., & Paleari, S. (2009). Firms’ growth: Does the innovation system matter? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium’. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169–1184. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A. (2016). The impact of local knowledge bases on the creation of innovative start-ups in Italy. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9722-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Vivarelli, M. (2016). To be born is not enough: The key role of innovative startups. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9716-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., & Quatraro, F. (2018). New firm formation and regional knowledge production modes: Italian evidence. Research Policy, 47(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., Nathan, M., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation. Research Policy, 45(1), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit-de Vries, E., Dolfsma, W. A., van der Windt, H. J., & Gerkema, M. P. (2019). Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: A review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(4), 1236–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9660-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn, S., Schweiger, B., & Albers, S. (2016). Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 34(5), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/259056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, I., Faems, D., & de Faria, P. (2016). Coopetition and product innovation performance: The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2013). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 564–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2022). Schumpeterian entry: Innovation, exporting, and growth aspirations of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(2), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720909771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faems, D., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. (2014). The character of innovative places: Entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9574-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK community innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(7), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. (2011). Start-ups in innovative industries–causes and effects. In D. B. Audretsch, O. Falck, S. Heblich, & A. Lederer (Eds.), Handbook of innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 365–381). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Aamoucke, R. (2013). Regional public research, higher education, and innovative start-ups: An empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 41, 865–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., Obschonka, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2019). Historical roots of entrepreneurship-facilitating culture and innovation activity: An analysis for German regions. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1296–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1580357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany 1925 to 2005. Regional Studies, 48(6), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.816414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2018). Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start-ups over time and space – An empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlotti, M., & Soda, G. (2018). Fit for the task: Complementarity, asymmetry, and partner selection in alliances. Organization Science, 29(5), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannetti, E., & Piga, C. A. (2017). The contrasting effects of active and passive cooperation on innovation and productivity: Evidence from British local innovation networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., & Sanandaji, T. (2018). Schumpeterian entrepreneurship in Europe compared to other industrialized regions. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 157–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., & Sanandaji, T. (2020). Measuring entrepreneurship: Do established metrics capture Schumpeterian entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(4), 733–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719844500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. (2006). The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy, 35(7), 1018–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intihar, A., & Pollack, J. M. (2012). Exploring small family-owned firms’ competitive ability: Differentiation through trust, value-orientation, and market specialization. Journal of Family Business Management, 2(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/20436231211216439
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63(3), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3-4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., Van Montfort, K., & Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and new technology, 11(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590210899
   Google Scholar
• Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I. M. (2019). More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level. Research Policy, 48(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, J., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial dynamics and higher education institutions in the post-communist world. Regional Studies, 51(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1103370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, N. (2010). Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality? Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1194–1209. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011). Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 45(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903401618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392–1419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å. (1998). Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1996). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy, 25(3), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00840-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E., & Lee, J. (1996). The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, 25(7), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani, M. M., & Belitski, M. (2022). The effect of coopetition intensity on first mover advantage and imitation in innovation-related coopetition: Empirical evidence from UK firms. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (2009). Principles of economics: Unabridged eighth edition. Cosimo.
   Google Scholar
• Mindruta, D. (2013). Value creation in university–firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Strategic Management Journal, 34(6), 644–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00066-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mthanti, T., & Ojah, K. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation (EO): measurement and policy implications of entrepreneurship at the macroeconomic level. Research Policy, 46(4), 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeh, A., & Yami, S. (2019). Orchestrating resources for FMA in coopetitive NPD. R&D Management, 49(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36(7), 1016–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2021a). Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Office for National Statistics, Northern Ireland. Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment, UK Innovation Survey, 1994–2021: Secure Access. [data collection]. 6th Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 6699. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6699-6
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2021b). Business structure database, 1997–2021: Secure Access. [data collection]. 9th Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 6697. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6697-9
   Google Scholar
• Pahnke, A., Welter, F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2023). In the eye of the beholder? Differentiating between SMEs and Mittelstand. Small Business Economics, 60(2), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00612-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radko, N., Belitski, M. & Kalyuzhnova, Y. (2023). Conceptualising the entrepreneurial university: The stakeholder approach. Journal of Technology Transfer, 48, 955–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09926-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009). What’s in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition. Technovation, 29(12), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014451.99047.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, S., Love, J. H., & Bonner, K. (2017). Firms’ knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2001). Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, R., & Boekema, F. (2012). From learning region to learning in a socio-spatial context. Regional Studies, 46(8), 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.712679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvetat, D., & Géraudel, M. (2012). The tertius roles in a coopetitive context: The case of the European aeronautical and aerospace engineering sector. European Management Journal, 30(6), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamaria, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schamberger, D. K., Cleven, N. J., & Brettel, M. (2013). Performance effects of exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies and the moderating role of external innovation partners. Industry and Innovation, 20(4), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.805928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of largescale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934 [1911]). The theory of economic development. Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. M., & Ford, C. M. (2014). How entrepreneurs use networks to address changing resource requirements during early venture development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., Motohashi, K., Hu, X., & Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2020). University–industry interaction and product innovation performance of Guangdong manufacturing firms: The roles of regional proximity and research quality of universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(2), 578–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09715-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Un, C. A., & Asakawa, K. (2015). Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 138–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. 2nd ed.. South-Western, Mason.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar