The corporate social assessment: making public purpose pay

References

• Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections Do Not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, N. (2021). Avoiding competition: The effects of rankings in the food waste field. In Competition: What It Is and Why It happens (pp. 112–130). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898012.003.0007.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in porto alegre. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation. Theory, strategy, and practice (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R., & Mayer, C. (2017). “How should a ‘Sustainable corporation’ Account for natural capital?” Said Business School Research Papers, no. 2017–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., & Parkinson, J. (2019). Mapping and measuring deliberation: Towards a New deliberative quality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2014). The structural power of business and the power of ideas: The strange case of the Australian mining Tax. New Political Economy, 19(3), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. (2022). Managerial discretion, market failure and democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05152-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, M., & Claassen, R. (2022a). Taming the corporate leviathan. How to properly politicize corporate purpose. In M. Bennett, H. Brouwer, & R. Claassen (Eds.), Wealth and power: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 145–165). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M., & Claassen, R. (2022b). The corporate power trilemma. Journal of Politics, 84(4), 2094–2106. https://doi.org/10.1086/717851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, F., Kölbel, J., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger-Walliser, G., & Scott, I. (2018). Redefining corporate social responsibility in an Era of globalization and regulatory hardening. American Business Law Journal, https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Business Roundtable Redefines the Purpose of a Corporation to Promote ‘An Economy That Serves All Americans.’”. (2019). August 19, 2019. https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2007). What does It mean To Say that economics Is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S., & Hepburn, C. (2011). Carbon trading: Unethical, unjust and ineffective? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 69, 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246111000282
   Google Scholar
• Center for Responsive Politics. 2016. Top individual contributors: all federal contributions. OpenSecrets. https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php?cycle=2016&view=fc.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the Eye of The beholder? The case of ESG ratings. Accounting Review, 97, https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciepley, D. (2019). Can corporations be held to the public interest, or even to the Law? Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3894-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, R. (2023). Wealth creation without domination. A fiduciary theory of corporate power. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26(7), https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2113224
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2011). The strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curato, N., Dryzek, J. S., Ercan, S. A., Hendriks, C. M., & Niemeyer, S. (2017). Twelve Key findings in deliberative democracy research. Daedalus, 146(3), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. (2021). Corporate purpose needs democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 902–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin, S. (2012). The corporation as commons: Rethinking property rights, governance and sustainability in the business enterprise. Queen’s Law Journal, 37(2), 339–381.
   Google Scholar
• Dimson, E., Marsh, P., & Staunton, M. (2020). Divergent ESG ratings. Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(1), https://doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2020.1.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., Bächtiger, A., Chambers, S., Cohen, J., Druckman, J. N., Felicetti, A., & Fishkin, J. S. (2019). The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Science, 363(6432), 1144–1146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. G., & Stroehle, J. (2018). Exploring social origins in the construction of ESG measures. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3212685
   Google Scholar
• Edgecliffe-Johnson, A. (2019). Abigail Disney Criticises Chief's ‘Insane’ $65.7m Pay. April 22, 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/b1c68f4c-651a-11e9-9adc-98bf1d35a056.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., & De Gilder, D. (2022). The moral organization. Key issues, analyses, and solutions. Springer Nature Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration As a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, E., & Stark, D. (2019). What’s observed in a rating? Rankings as orientation in the face of uncertainty. Theory, Culture and Society, 36(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feintuck, M. (2010). Regulatory rationales beyond the economic: In search of the public interest. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave, & M. Lodge (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of regulation (pp. 39–63). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felber, C. (2019). Change everything. Creating an economiy for the common good. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreras, I. (2017). Firms as political entities. Saving democracy through economic bicameralism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2018). Democracy when the people Are thinking: Revitalizing our politics through public deliberation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, A., Guevara, M. W., Bowers, S., Clerix, K., Díaz-Struck, E., Carvajal, R., Cabra, M., Knus-Galán, M., Obermayer, B., Bové, L., & Kleinnijenhuis, J. 2014. New leak reveals Luxembourg tax deals for Disney, Koch Brothers empire. International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, December 9, 2014. https://www.icij.org/investigations/luxembourg-leaks/new-leak-reveals-luxembourg-tax-deals-disney-koch-brothers-empire/.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, E., & Evan, W. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90022-Y
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the Art. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. (2012). Crowding Out and crowding In of intrinsic preferences. In E. Brousseau, T. Dedeurwaerdere, & B. Siebenhuner (Eds.), Reflexive governance for global public goods (pp. 75–83). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1970). “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.” The New York Times Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D. (2007). Business power in global governance. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E., & Niemeyer, S. J. (2003). When does deliberation begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(4), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Brennan, A., & Malpas, J. (2014). New accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38(4), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., & Herremans, I. (2012). Sustainability and social responsibility reporting and the emergence of the external social audits: The struggle for accountability? In The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment (pp. 405–424). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199584451.003.0022
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, K. (2006). The failure of corporate Law. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. A. (2014). Against elections: The lottocratic alternative. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 42(2), 135–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, G., & Bodie, M. (2020). Reconstructing the corporation. From shareholder primacy to shared governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, J. (2014). Morality, competition and the firm. The market failures approach to business ethics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, J. (2018). ‘But everyone else Is doing It’: Competition and business self-regulation. Journal of Social Philosophy, 49(4), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, A., & Pogge, T. (2008). The health impact fund. Making New medicines accessible for All. Incentives for Global Health.
   Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., & Carter, C. (2010). Manufacturing competition: How accounting practices shape strategy making in cities. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(3), https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011034325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things No One will tell You about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. (2020). Open democracy: Reinventing popular rule for the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrpouya, A., & Samiolo, R. (2016). Performance measurement in global governance: Ranking and the politics of variability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrpouya, A., & Samiolo, R. (2019). Numbers in regulatory intermediation: Exploring the role of performance measurement between legitimacy and compliance. Regulation and Governance, 13(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooij, R. A. d., & Ederveen, S. (2008). Corporate Tax elasticities: A reader’s guide to empirical findings. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(4), 680–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Néron, P.-Y. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post-citizen united area: Political equality, corporate citizenship, and market failures. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2867-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, S. (2011). The emancipatory effect of deliberation: Empirical lessons from mini-publics. Politics & Society, 39(1), 103–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210395000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Innovative citizen participation and New democratic institutions. OECD, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en
   Google Scholar
• Ordóñez, L. D., Schweitzer, M. E., Galinsky, A. D., Bazerman, M. H. (2009). Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 6–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pek, S., Mena, S., & Lyons, B. (2023). The role of deliberative mini-publics in improving the deliberative capacity of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(1), 102–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollman, E. (2022). “The making and meaning of ESG.” European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper No. 659/2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, N., & D’Adderio, L. (2012). Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(8), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society. Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quak, S., Heilbron, J., & Meijer, J. (2019). Ranking, coordination, and global governance: The case of the access to medicine index. Business and Politics, 21(2), https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2018.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahom, M. M., & Idowu, S. O. (eds.). (2015). Social audit regulation. Development, challenges and opportunities. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ringel, L., Espeland, W., Sauder, M., & Werron, T. (2021). Research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 74), https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20210000074026
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. (2013). Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights. 1 edition. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Samiolo, R., & Mehrpouya, A. (2021). Between stakeholders and third parties: Regulatory rankings and the organization of competition. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 74, https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20210000074029
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. (2005). Should We buy the right to pollute? In Public philosophy: Essays on morality in politics (pp. 93–96). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, A., Baumann-Pauly, D., & Schneider, A. (2012). Democratizing corporate governance: Compensating for the democratic deficit of corporate political activity and corporate citizenship. Business & Society, 52(3), 473–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312446931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2012). Reconfiguring relations of accountability: Materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, A. (2018a). Justice failure: Efficiency and equality in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3086-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, A. (2018b). The form of the firm: A normative political theory of the corporation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., & Setälä, M. (2018). Mini-Publics and deliberative democracy. In A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.27
   Google Scholar
• Stark, A. (2010). Business in politics: Lobbying and corporate campaign contributions. In G. Brenkert, & T. Beauchamp (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics (pp. 500–532). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• StrineJr.L. E. (2020). “Toward fair and sustainable capitalism: a comprehensive proposal to help american workers, restore fair gainsharing between employees and shareholders, and increase American competitiveness by reorienting our corporate governance system toward sustainable.” Roosevelt Institute Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G. H., Escobar, O., Roberts, J. J., Elstub, S., & Pamphilis, N. M. (2021). The importance of context and the effect of information and deliberation on opinion change regarding environmental issues in citizens’ juries. Sustainability, 13(17), 9852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara, C. (2020). Systemic corruption: Constitutional ideas for an anti-oligarchic republic. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue. The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business & Society, 49(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309343407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E., & Gastil, J. (2015). Can deliberative minipublics address the cognitive challenges of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 77(2), 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1086/680078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werron, T. (2014). On public forms of competition. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 14(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613507891
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance. In J. Gordon, & W.-G. Ringe (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate Law and governance (pp. 635–678). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar