Socioscientific comics: introducing students to societal issues using stories

References

• Andreani, D., and G. Gunansyah. 2022. Persepsi Guru Sekolah Dasar tentang Mata Pelajaran IPAS pada Kurikulum Merseka. JPGSD 11 (9):1841–54.
   Google Scholar
• Anggereini, E., J. Siburian, and A. Hamidah. 2023. Identification of project based learning and STEM PjBL innovation based on socio scientific issues as an effort to improve students’ scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia 11 (1):165–77. doi: 10.24815/jpsi.v11i1.26927.
   Google Scholar
• Argus, G., and M. Thompson. 2008. Perceived social problem solving, perfectionism, and mindful awareness in clinical depression: An exploratory study. Cognitive Therapy and Research 32 (6):745–57. doi: 10.1007/s10608-006-9102-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ario, B. C., E. B. Oladumiye, and T. I. Ibiwoye. 2020. Adopting comic-style illustrations for promoting environmental sustainability. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development 9 (3):5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ariza, M., A. Abril, A. Quesada, and F. García. 2014. Bridging inquiry based learning and science education on socio scientific issues: Contributions to the PARRISE European Project. 2599–607.
   Google Scholar
• Aznam, N., and I. Irwanto. 2021. Socio-scientific issues as a vehicle to promote soft skills and environmental awareness. European Journal of Educational Research 10 (1):161–74. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.161.
   Google Scholar
• Birmingham, D., and A. Calabrese Barton. 2014. Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (3):286–314. doi: 10.1002/tea.21127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossér, U. 2018. Exploring the complexities of integrating socioscientific issues in science teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Bossér, U., and M. Lindahl. 2019. Students’ positioning in the classroom: A study of teacher-student interactions in a socioscientific issue context. Research in Science Education 49 (2):371–90. doi: 10.1007/s11165-017-9627-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossér, U., M. Lundin, M. Lindahl, and C. Linder. 2015. Challenges faced by teachers implementing socio-scientific issues as core elements in their classroom practices. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3 (2):159–76. doi: 10.30935/scimath/9429.
   Google Scholar
• Böttcher, F., and A. Meisert. 2013. Effects of direct and indirect instruction on fostering decision-making competence in socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education 43 (2):479–506. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9271-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brienza, C. 2010. Producing comics culture: A sociological approach to the study of comics. Journal of Graphic Novels & Comics 1 (2):105–19. doi: 10.1080/21504857.2010.528638.
   Google Scholar
• Bruene-Butler, L., J. Hampson, M. J. Elias, and J. F. Clabby. 1997. The improving social awareness-social problem solving project.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., M. Ideland, C. Malmberg, and M. Grace. 2014. Climate change and everyday life: Repertoires children use to negotiate a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education 36 (9):1491–509. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.891159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalık, M., and A. Wiyarsi. 2021. A systematic review of the research papers on chemistry-focused socio-scientific issues. Journal of Baltic Science Education 20 (3):360–72. doi: 10.33225/jbse/21.20.360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casselman, M. D., K. Atit, G. Henbest, C. Guregyan, K. Mortezaei, and J. F. Eichler. 2019. Dissecting the flipped classroom: Using a randomized controlled trial experiment to determine when student learning occurs. Journal of Chemical Education 97 (1):27–35. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, J., H. B. Kim, S.-Y. Kan, W. Y. Foo, X. Y. Low, J. Y. Ow, P. D. Bala Chandran, G. E. Lee, J. W. H. Yong, and P. W. Chia. 2021. Integrating organic chemical-based socio-scientific issues comics into chemistry classroom: Expanding chemists’ toolbox. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews 14 (4):689–99. doi: 10.1080/17518253.2021.2005153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and S. Xiao. 2021. Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review 32:100377. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, K. K. C., and K. W. H. Tai. 2021. The use of intercoder reliability in qualitative interview data analysis in science education. Research in Science & Technological Education 41 (3):1155–75. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2021.1993179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, N., S.-N. Chang Rundgren, and H.-O. Höglund. 2012. Using the SEE-SEP model to analyze upper secondary students’ use of supporting reasons in arguing socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (3):342–52. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9328-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csóti, M. 2001. Social awareness skills for children. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Damon, W. 1975. Early conceptions of positive justice as related to the development of logical operations. Child Development 46 (2):301–12. doi: 10.2307/1128122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, T. J., B. H. Nichols, and D. L. Zeidler. 2009. Using socioscientific issues in primary classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education 21 (3):1–12. doi: 10.1007/BF03174719.
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos, W. L. P. 2014. Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: Science teaching towards political literacy. Cultural Studies of Science Education 9 (3):663–74. doi: 10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x.
   Google Scholar
• Eidin, E., and Y. Shwartz. 2023. From ideal to practical—A design of teacher professional development on socioscientific issues. Sustainability 15 (14):11394. doi: 10.3390/su151411394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, M. J., and S. E. Tobias. 1996. Social problem solving: Interventions in the schools. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmons, N., K. Lees, and D. Kelemen. 2018. Young children’s near and far transfer of the basic theory of natural selection: An analogical storybook intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (3):321–47. doi: 10.1002/tea.21421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M. 2011. Discussing a socioscientific issue in a primary school classroom: The case of using a technology-supported environment in formal and nonformal settings. In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom, 133–59. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, S.-C., Y.-S. Hsu, and S.-S. Lin. 2019. Conceptualizing socioscientific decision making from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 17 (3):427–48. doi: 10.1007/s10763-018-9890-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinella, M. 2018. The potential of comics in science communication. Journal of Science Communication 17 (1):Y01. doi: 10.22323/2.17010401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. 2014. Scepticism and trust: Two counterpoint essentials in science education for complex socio-scientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education 9 (3):649–61. doi: 10.1007/s11422-013-9560-1.
   Google Scholar
• Garrecht, C., M. J. Reiss, and U. Harms. 2021. ‘I wouldn’t want to be the animal in use nor the patient in need’–The role of issue familiarity in students’ socioscientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education 43 (12):2065–86. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1950944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino, K. F., E. M. Wakefield, R. G. Morrison, and L. E. Richland. 2022. Why do children struggle on analogical reasoning tasks? Considering the role of problem format by measuring visual attention. Acta Psychologica 224:103505. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C., M. H. Newton, and D. L. Zeidler. 2021. Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction on students’ contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education 105 (4):585–627. doi: 10.1002/sce.21618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C., D. L. Zeidler, and M. Newton. 2020. Students’ emotive reasoning through place-based environmental socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education 50 (5):2081–109. doi: 10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. 2000. Marginalization of socioscientific material in science–technology–society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (5):426–40. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<426::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitt, W., and J. Hummel. 2003. Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Educational Psychology Interactive 3 (2): 1–3. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., Y. Ko, S. S. Shim, S.-Y. Ok, and H. Lee. 2023. Promoting engineering students’ social responsibility and willingness to act on socioscientific issues. International Journal of STEM Education 10 (1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40594-023-00402-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jho, H., H.-G. Yoon, and M. Kim. 2014. The relationship of science knowledge, attitude and decision making on socio-scientific issues: The case study of students’ debates on a nuclear power plant in Korea. Science & Education 23 (5):1131–51. doi: 10.1007/s11191-013-9652-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, L., L. A. Zangori, T. D. Sadler, and P. J. Friedrichsen. 2021. Integrating scientific modeling and socio-scientific reasoning to promote scientific literacy. In Socioscientific issues-based instruction for scientific literacy development, 31–54. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Kemendikbud. 2023. Kurikulum Merdeka: Keleluasaan Pendidik dan Pembelajaran Berkualitas. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum-merdeka/
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, U., and S. Chinokul. 2020. Effect of the scaffolded reading experience using a graphic novel on the English reading comprehension and reading motivation of Thai EFL students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network 13 (2):158–75.
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. 2022. Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in socioscientific and scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education 44 (4):647–73. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2022.2050488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, G., Y. Ko, and H. Lee. 2020. The effects of community-based socioscientific issues program (SSI-COMM) on promoting students’ sense of place and character as citizens. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18 (3):399–418. doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09976-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., R. Anthony, and D. Blades. 2014. Decision making through dialogue: A case study of analyzing preservice teachers’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education 44 (6):903–26. doi: 10.1007/s11165-014-9407-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinskey, M., and D. Zeidler. 2020. Elementary preservice teachers’ challenges in designing and implementing socioscientific issues-based lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education 32 (3):350–72. doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2020.1826079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterman, M. L., and T. D. Sadler. 2010. Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education 32 (8):1017–43. doi: 10.1080/09500690902894512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koulougliotis, D., L. Antonoglou, and K. Salta. 2021. Probing Greek secondary school students’ awareness of green chemistry principles infused in context-based projects related to socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education 43 (2):298–313. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1867327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, K. Y., Q. Kong, Y. Song, L. Deng, Y. Kang, and A. Hu. 2019. What predicts adolescents’ critical thinking about real-life news? The roles of social media news consumption and news media literacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity 33:100570. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambropoulos, N., X. Faulkner, and F. Culwin. 2012. Supporting social awareness in collaborative e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (2):295–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01184.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., F. Abd-El-Khalick, and K. Choi. 2006. Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio-scientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education 6 (2):97–117. doi: 10.1080/14926150609556691.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, L., and M. K. Willcox. 2012. Issue-oriented science: Using socioscientific issues to engage biology students. The American Biology Teacher 74 (8):551–6. doi: 10.1525/abt.2012.74.8.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestari, R., T. Haryono, and E. Erman. 2021. Using comic-based socio-scientific issues in inquiry learning to increase interest and achievement in science learning. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching 4 (1):62–81. doi: 10.21043/thabiea.v4i1.9919.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., and J. Leach. 2006. Discussion of socio-scientific issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education 28 (11):1267–87. doi: 10.1080/09500690500439348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, M. G., A. Folkesson, and D. L. Zeidler. 2019. Students’ recognition of educational demands in the context of a socioscientific issues curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56 (9):1155–82. doi: 10.1002/tea.21548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E., R. Lehrer, and L. Schauble. 2020. Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57 (7):1148–74. doi: 10.1002/tea.21625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, M., W. Widodo, A. Qosyim, M. Mahdiannur, and B. Jatmiko. 2021. Improving undergraduate science education students’ argumentation skills through debates on socioscientific issues. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 10 (3):428–38. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30050.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, M. P., E. H. SewellJr., and I. Gordon. 2001. Introducing comics and ideology. Comics and Ideology 2:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. 2019. Content analysis and thematic analysis. In Advance research methods for applied psychology: Design, analysis and reporting, 211–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, M. H., and D. L. Zeidler. 2020. Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education 42 (8):1302–19. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1756515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, S., B. Björkman, A.-L. Almqvist, L. Almqvist, P. Björk-Willén, D. Donohue, K. Enskär, M. Granlund, K. Huus, and S. Hvit. 2015. Children’s voices–Differentiating a child perspective from a child’s perspective. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 18 (3):162–8. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2013.801529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., and H. Joffe. 2020. Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19:160940691989922. doi: 10.1177/1609406919899220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. PISA 2018 result. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, G. T. 2014. Qualitative methods in higher education policy analysis: Using interviews and document analysis. The Qualitative Report 19 (26):1. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1211.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdem-Yilmaz, Y., and K. Bilican. 2020. Discovery learning—Jerome Bruner. In Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory, 177–90. Cham: Springer Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Pattiwael, A. S. 2019. Literature for developing student’s. Humanity Awareness 1 (1):79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1972. Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development 15 (1):1–12. doi: 10.1159/000271225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbani, S. A., and U. Khoirotunnisa. 2021. Online English comics as reading materials for English language education department students. European Journal of Educational Research 10 (3):1359–69. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1359.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., A. Amirshokoohi, M. Kazempour, and K. M. Allspaw. 2006. Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (4):353–76. doi: 10.1002/tea.20142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., S. A. Barab, and B. Scott. 2007. What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education 37 (4):371–91. doi: 10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005. Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (1):112–38. doi: 10.1002/tea.20042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka, M. 2023. Pre-service primary school teachers’ application of the features of the nature of science to socioscientific. Science Insights Education Frontiers 14 (2):2059–75. doi: 10.15354/sief.23.or092.
   Google Scholar
• Septialti, D., Z. Shaluhiyah, and B. Widjanarko. 2022. The effectiveness of using comics in efforts to increase adolescent health knowledge: A literature review. Jurnal Aisyah: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan 7 (S1):273–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sequeira, P., F. S. Melo, R. Prada, and A. Paiva. 2011. Emerging social awareness: Exploring intrinsic motivation in multiagent learning. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) :1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Shana, Z., and E. S. Abulibdeh. 2020. Science practical work and its impact on students’ science achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education 10 (2):199. doi: 10.3926/jotse.888.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin, N., O. Aslan, and S. Yilmaz. 2016. Research trends on socioscientific issues: A content analysis of publications in selected science education journals. Journal of Education and Training Studies 4 (9):16–24. doi: 10.11114/jets.v4i9.1572.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoubaris, D., L. Bencze, S. Curtis, and M. Zouda. 2020. Practical suggestions for promoting science student actions to overcome social and environmental harms. School Science Review 102 (379):64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Uskola, A., G. Maguregi, and M. Jiménez-Aleixandre. 2010. The use of criteria in argumentation and the construction of environmental concepts: A university case study. International Journal of Science Education 32 (17):2311–33. doi: 10.1080/09500690903501736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, H. S., J. M. Borkan, J. S. Taylor, D. Anthony, and S. P. Reis. 2012. Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: Developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 87 (1):41–50. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823b55fa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warden, D., and S. Mackinnon. 2003. Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 21 (3):367–85. doi: 10.1348/026151003322277757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibowo, M. A., and H. Adhianata. 2023. Efficacy of balanced nutrition comic as a learning medium in nutrition education intervention for primary school-age children in Sampang District. Jurnal Ners Dan Kebidanan 10 (2):254–9. doi: 10.26699/jnk.v10i2.ART.p254-259.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. 2014. Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis. Theory, research, and practice. In Handbook of research on science education, ed. N. G. Lederman and S. K. Abell, vol. 2, 697–726. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., B. C. Herman, and T. D. Sadler. 2019. New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 1 (1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., and B. H. Nichols. 2009. Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education 21 (2):49–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03173684.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., and T. D. Sadler. 2007. The role of moral reasoning in argumentation: Conscience, character, and care. In Argumentation in science education, 201–16. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., T. D. Sadler, M. L. Simmons, and E. V. Howes. 2005. Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education 89 (3):357–77. doi: 10.1002/sce.20048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar