A gamified-integrated STEM activity about global climate change

References

• Annetta, L. A., W. M. Frazier, E. Folta, S. Holmes, R. Lamb, and M. T. Cheng. 2013. Science teacher efficacy and extrinsic factors toward professional development using video games in a design-based research model: The next generation of STEM learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22 (1):47–61. doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9375-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., and S. W. Slough. 2013. Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In STEM Project-Based Learning, eds. R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, and J. R. Morgan, 1–5. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hestness, E., J. R. McGinnis, and W. Breslyn. 2016. Examining the relationship between middle school students’ sociocultural participation and their ideas about climate change. Environmental Education Research 25 (6):912–24. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1266303.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, C. C. 2022. Climate change education: Knowing, doing and being. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., and A. Lamb. 2007. Project, problem, and inquiry-based learning. Journal (Online). Accessed May 19, 2023. http://eduscapes.com/tap/topic43.html.
   Google Scholar
• Karsgaard, C., and D. Davidson. 2023. Must we wait for youth to speak out before we listen? International youth perspectives and climate change education. Educational Review 75 (1):74–92. Vol. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2021.1905611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolenatý, M., R. Kroufek, and J. Činčera. 2022. What triggers climate action: The impact of a climate change education program on students’ climate literacy and their willingness to act. Sustainability 14 (16):10365. doi: 10.3390/su141610365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, E., E. Atkins, J. K. Garrett, J. F. Abrams, D. Shackleton, L. Hennessy, E. E. Mayall, J. Bennett, and I. Leach. 2022. Stories of hope created together: A pilot, school-based workshop for sharing eco emotions and creating an actively hopeful vision of the future. Frontiers in Psychology 13:1076322. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1076322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2011. Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: NAP.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: NAP.
   Google Scholar
• Novia, N., A. Permanasari, and R. Riandi. 2021. Research on educational games in STEM area 2010 2020: A bibliometric analysis of literature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1806 (1):012209.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, M. 2012. Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research 18 (5):625–42. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.637157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, W., J. Hamari, L. Shi, A. M. Toda, L. Rodrigues, P. T. Palomino, and S. Isotani. 2023. Tailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda. Education and Information Technologies 28 (1):373–406. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11122-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2020. Curriculum (re)design. A series of thematic reports from the OECD education 2030 project. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Özdem, Y., B. Dal, N. Öztürk, D. Sönmez, and U. Alper. 2014. What is that thing called climate change? An investigation into the understanding of climate change by seventh grade students. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 23 (4):294–313. Voldoi: 10.1080/10382046.2014.946323.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, Z., and Y. Samur. 2017. Oyunlaştırma Yönteminin Öğrencilerin Motivasyonları Üzerine Etkisi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi 18 (2):857–86. doi: 10.12984/egeefd.314801.
   Google Scholar
• Plutzer, E., and A. L. Hannah. 2018. Teaching climate change in middle schools and high schools: Investigating STEM education’s deficit model. Climatic Change 149 (3–4):305–17. doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2253-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajanen, D., and M. Rajanen. 2019. Climate change gamification: A literature review. GamiFIN :253–64. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2359/paper22.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rousell, D., and A. Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles. 2019. The parental milieu: Biosocial connections with nonhuman animals, technologies, and the earth. The Journal of Environmental Education 50 (2):84–96. Voldoi: 10.1080/00958964.2018.1509833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svihla, V., and M. C. Linn. 2012. A design-based approach to fostering understanding of global climate change. International Journal of Science Education 34 (5):651–76. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.597453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toriz, E. 2019. Learning based on flipped classroom with just-in-time teaching, Unity3D, gamification and educational spaces. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 13 (3):1159–73. doi: 10.1007/s12008-019-00560-z.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, P., and S. Feinstein. 2017. An exploratory multiple case study about using game based learning in STEM classrooms. International Journal of Research in Education and Science 3 (2):582. doi: 10.21890/ijres.328087.
   Google Scholar
• Zaki, N. A. A., N. Z. M. Zain, N. A. Z. M. Noor, and H. Hashim. 2020. Developing a conceptual model of learning analytics in serious games for STEM education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 9 (3):330–9. doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24466.
   Google Scholar
• Zhonggen, Y. 2019. A meta-analysis of use of serious games in education over a decade. International Journal of Computer Games Technology 2019:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2019/4797032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulyusri, Z., I. Elfira, L. Lufri, and T. A. Santosa. 2023. Literature study: Utilization of the PjBL model in science education to improve creativity and critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA 9 (1):133–43. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2555.
   Google Scholar