From micro to bio: using Vee Diagram, concept map and mind map in the framework of REACT strategy in environmental education

References

• Acar, B., and M. Yaman. 2011. The effects of context-based learnıng on students’ levels of knowledge and ınterest Hacettepe. University Journal of Education 40:01–10.
   Google Scholar
• Akdas, E. 2014. The effect of using context-based learning model in seventh grade science and technology course, environment and human unit, on students’ academic achievements, attitudes towards environment and knowledge retention. Master Thesis. Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Alsuraihi, A. A. 2022. The effect of implementing mind maps for online learning and assessment on students during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross sectional study. BMC Medical Education 22 (1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03211-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M. C., and V. J. Risko. 2007. The use of vee diagrams with third graders as a metacognitive tool for learning science concepts. Teaching and Learning Faculty Research. Paper 5. http://digitalscholarship.tnstate.edu/teaching/5
   Google Scholar
• Asmahasanah, S., I. Ibdalsyah, and M. Sa’diyah. 2018. Social studies education in elementary schools through contextual REACT-based on environment and sociopreneur. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 5 (6):52–61. doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v5i6.487.
   Google Scholar
• Atiwesh, G., A. Mikhael, C. C. Parrish, J. Banoub, and T. A. T. Le. 2021. Environmental impact of bioplastic use: A review. Heliyon 7 (9):e07918. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baydere, F. K., and E. Aydın. 2019. Teaching “the eye” topic through the explanation assisted react strategy of the context-based approach. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty 39 (2):755–91. doi: 10.17152/gefad.345897.
   Google Scholar
• Baydere, F. K., and E. A. Yanmaz. 2021. 7th Grade Students’ Views About Teaching Materials Developed According to REACT Strategy of Context-Based Learning Approach: “Mirrors and Absorption of Light. PESA International Journal of Social Studies 7 (1):45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and J. Holman. 2003. Context-based approaches to the teaching of chemistry: What are they and what are their effects?. Chemical education: Towards research-based practice, ed. J. K. Gilbert, O. D. Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, J. H. V. Driel, s.165–185. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and F. Lubben. 2006. Context-based chemistry: The salters approach. International Journal of Science Education 28 (9):999–1015. doi: 10.1080/09500690600702496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biktimirov, E. N., and L. B. Nilson. 2006. Show them the money: Using mind mapping in the introductory fnance course. Journal of Financial Education 32:72–86. doi: 10.2307/41948535.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, E., and J. Lozano. 2015. Ecolabels, uncertified abatement, and the sustainability of natural resources: An evolutionary approach. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 25 (3):623–47. doi: 10.1007/s00191-015-0403-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonniteewanich, J., S. Pitivut, S. Tongjoy, S. Lapnonkawow, and S. Suttiruengwong. 2014. Evaluation of carbon footprint of bioplastic straw compared to petroleum based straw products. Energy Procedia. 56:518–24. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.187.
   Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, O., E. Guven, M. Hamalosmanoglu, Z. Kaplan, K. Sungur Gul, and S. Varinlioglu. 2014. Review of the studies about environmental education: Current status in Turkey. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8 (2):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, A. 2003. Graphical knowledge display-mind mapping and concept mapping as efficient tools in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Review 16 :35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, A., and S. O. Butuner. 2007. Graphical Knowledge Display- Mind Mapping and Concept Mapping as Efficient Tools in Mathematics Education. Elementary Education Online 6 (1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, T., and B. Buzan. 2006. The mind map book. London, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Butuner, S. O., and H. Gur. 2008. Teaching of angles and triangles by using vee diagrams and mind maps. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2 (1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, C. F., W. M. W. So, T. Y. Cheung, and S. K. D. Yeung. 2017. Plastic waste problem and education for plastic waste management. Emerging Practices in Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in a Digital Era, ed. S. C. Kong, T. L. Wong, M. Yang, C. F. Chow, K. H. Tse, 125–140. Springer, Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3344-5_8.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. R., J. E. Heimlich, N. M. Ardoin, and J. Braus. 2020. Using a delphi study to clarify the landscape and core outcomes in environmental education. Environmental Education Research 26 (3):381–99. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2020.1727859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M. L. 2001. Teaching contextually. Research, rationale, and techniques for improving student motivation and achievement in mathematics and science. Texas: Cord.
   Google Scholar
• Damoah, B., and B. I. Omodan. 2022. Determinants of effective environmental education policy in South African schools. International Journal of Educational Research Open 3:100206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100206.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, O. 2008. Context-based chemical education: How to improve it? Chemical Education International 8 (1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, H., S. Vural, and G. Demircioglu. 2012. The effect of a teaching material developed based on “REACT” strategy on gifted students’ achievement. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty 31 (2):101–44.
   Google Scholar
• Deveci, I., and I. Karteri. 2022. Context-based learning supported by environmental measurement devices in science teacher education: A mixed method research. Journal of Biological Education 56 (5):487–512. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2020.1821083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, L. D. E. 2017. Pedagogical guidelines for the elaboration of an educational planning in environmental education in the school scope in the framework of the key competences. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 12 (9):2043–8.
   Google Scholar
• Esteban Ibáñez, M., D. Musitu Ferrer, L. V. Amador Muñoz, F. M. Claros, and F. J. Olmedo Ruiz. 2020. University as change manager of attitudes towards environment (The importance of environmental education). Sustainability 12 (11):4568. doi: 10.3390/su12114568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, W. T., A. Hassan, and B. A. LePage. 2023. Introduction to Environmental Education. In The Living Environmental Education. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-4234-1_1.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., and R. E. Mayer. 2016. Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review 28 (4):717–41. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitakurahmah, N., R. A. Sambodo, P. Karyanto, S. Astorini, and D. Oetomo. 2020. The Implementation of Discovery Learning-Based E-Module: Effectiveness of Using Vee Diagram in Concept’s Construction and Learning Achievement in Environmental Topics. Paper presented at the 2nd Educational Sciences International Conference (ESIC 2019), 27–31. Atlantis Press. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200417.007.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. 2006. On the nature of ‘context’ in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education 28 (9):957–76. doi: 10.1080/09500690600702470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. N., J. J. Kennelly, and T. S. Krause. 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. The Academy of Management Review 20 (4):874–907. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, S., and T. R. Koballa. 2005. The contextual teaching and learning instructional approach. In Exemplary Science: Best Practices In Professional Development, ed. R. E. Yager, 75–84. Arlington, Virginia: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurlitt, J., and A. Renkl. 2008. Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 (5):407–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00277.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid, A. 2021. The REACT-based contextual learning model and mastering the concept of physics in high school students. Asian Journal of Science Education 3 (1):56–62. doi: 10.24815/ajse.v3i1.19897.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, J., and G. Pilling. 2004. Thermodynamics in context: A case study of contextualized teaching for undergraduates. Journal of Chemical Education 81 (3):373–5. doi: 10.1021/ed081p373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, J., R. Dvorak, and E. Kosior. 2009. Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 364 (1526):2115–26. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichsan, I. Z., D. V. Sigit, M. Miarsyah, A. Ali, W. P. Arif, and T. A. Prayitno. 2019. HOTS-AEP: Higher Order Thinking Skills from Elementary to Master Students in Environmental Learning. European Journal of Educational Research 8 (4):935–42. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, S. J. 2003. The effects of contextual learning ınstruction on science achievement of male and female tenth grade students. Ph.D. Thesis. University of South Alabama
   Google Scholar
• Isobe, A., K. Kubo, Y. Tamura, S. Kako, E. Nakashima, and N. Fujii. 2014. Selective transport of microplastics and mesoplastics by drifting in coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin 89 (1-2):324–30. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.09.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 1984. Cooperative small-groups learning. Curriculum Report 14 (1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• King, D., and S. Henderson. 2018. Context-based learning in the middle years: Achieving resonance between the real-world field and environmental science concepts. International Journal of Science Education 40 (10):1221–38. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1470352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C. W., Y. H. Liao, B. S. Chen, Y. J. Tseng, and W. S. Ho. 2022. Elementary Teachers’ Environmental Education Cognition and Attitude: A Case Study of the Second Largest City in Taiwan. Sustainability 14 (21):14480. doi: 10.3390/su142114480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, G. A., and L. L. Hoody. 1998. Closing the Achievement Gap: Using the Environment as an Integrating Context for Learning. Results of a Nationwide Study. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. (ERIC Number: ED428943)
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. Z., Y. X. Tong, and Y. Q. Yang. 2018. The application of mind mapping into college computer programming teaching. Procedia Computer Science 129:66–70. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.047.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz-Sisitka, H. 2004. Positioning southern African environmental education in a changing context. Howick, South Africa: Share-net. https://reurl.cc/XV5DGa
   Google Scholar
• Luehmann, A. L. 2007. Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education 91 (5):822–39. doi: 10.1002/sce.20209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., S. J. Tollefson, and G. H. Roehrig. 2001. Using an alternative report format in undergraduate hydrology laboratories. Journal of Geoscience Education 49 (5):454–60. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-49.5.454.
   Google Scholar
• Makki, M. H., F. Abd-El-Khalick, and S. BouJaoude. 2003. Lebanese secondary school students’ environmental knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research 9 (1):21–33. doi: 10.1080/13504620303468.
   Google Scholar
• Marouli, C. 2021. Sustainability education for the future? Challenges and implications for education and pedagogy in the 21st century. Sustainability 13 (5):2901. doi: 10.3390/su13052901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marpaung, R. R. T., B. Yolida, and F. R. Putri. 2021. Student’s scientific literacy on environmental pollution material based on SETS learning approach combined with Vee Diagram. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) 7 (2):117–25. doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.15718.
   Google Scholar
• Nakhleh, M. B. 1994. Chemical Education Research in the Laboratory Environment: How can Research Uncover What Students are Learning? Journal of Chemical Education 71 (3):201–5. doi: 10.1021/ed071p201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navarra, A. 2006. Achieving Pedagogical Equity in the Classroom. Cord Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. M., J. A. Demers, and T. J. Christ. 2014. The Responsive Environmental Assessment for Classroom Teaching (REACT): The dimensionality of student perceptions of the instructional environment. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association 29 (2):182–97. doi: 10.1037/spq0000049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbit, J. C., and O. O. Adesope. 2006. Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research 76 (3):413–48. doi: 10.3102/00346543076003413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D, and D. B. Gowin. 1984. Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. 1990. Concept maps and Vee Diagrams: Two Metacognitive Tools to Faciltate Meaningful Learning. Instructional Science 19 (1):29–52. doi: 10.1007/BF00377984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. 1995. Concept mapping: A strategy for organizing knowledge. In Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice, ed. S. M. Glynn & R. Duit, 229–245. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ozsoy, S., H. Ertepınar, and N. Saglam. 2012. Can eco-schools improve elementary school students’ environmental literacy levels? Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 13 (2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ozay-Kose, E., and F. Cam-Tosun. 2011. The effects of life-based learning on student achievement in the nervous system. Journal of Turkish Science Education 8 (2):91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, F., and D.. Ramazanoglu. 2019. Production of wood-based eco-friendly bioplastic composites using waste banana peel, pepper stalk and red pine wood flour. Turkish Journal of Forestry 20 (3):267–273. doi: 10.18182/tjf.551787.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan, Z. 2022. The effect of using REACT Strategy in the topics of matter cycles and environmental problems on eighth-grade students’ research-questioning attitudes, curiosities for science subjects and academic achievements. Unpublished Master Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, G. G. 1998. Using Vee diagrams to facilitate meaningful learning and misconception remediation in radiologic technologies laboratory education. Radiologic Science and Education (1):11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Pei, L., M. Schmidt, and W. Wei. 2011. Conversion of biomass into bioplastics and their potential environmental impacts. Biotechnology of Biopolymers 3:58–74.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, B., and N. Dogan. 2015. The effects of Vee diagrams, concept maps, diagnostic branched tree on attitudes to mathematics course and success. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 11 (3):851–74.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Y., J. Yang, and J. Xue. 2015. Characterization of antimicrobial poly (lactic acid)/poly (trimethylene carbonate) films with cinnamaldehyde. Journal of Materials Science 50 (3):1150–8. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8671-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadhan, S., E. Sukma, and V. Indriyani. 2019. Environmental education and disaster mitigation through language learning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 314 (1):012054. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/314/1/012054.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. 2007. Blurring the Boundary between the Classroom and the Community: Challenges for Teachers’ Professional Knowledge. In The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching, ed. D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, and R. Gunstone, 13–29. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roehring, R., J. A. Luft, and M. Edwards. 2001. Versatile vee maps. The Science Teacher 68 (1):28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. E. 2012. Context-based learning. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, ed. N. M. Seel, 799–802. Boston: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M, and M. Browen. 1993. The unfolding vee. Science Scope 16 (5):28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. L., J. C. Nesbit, C. J. Anguiano, and O. O. Adesope. 2018. Studying and constructing maps: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 30 (2):431–55. doi: 10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. T. 2006. Context-based chemistry education contextualised chemistry education: The American experience. International Journal of Science Education 28 (9):977–98. doi: 10.1080/09500690600702488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, O., V. Fleming-Lehtinen, and M. Lehtiniemi. 2014. Ingestion and transfer of microplastics in the planktonic food web. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987) 185:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., H. Yang, Y. Dou, and Y. Zeng. 2022. Effects of mind mapping-based instruction on student cognitive learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review 24 (3):303–17. doi: 10.1007/s12564-022-09746-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. 2013. Educational psychology theory and practice. G. Yuksel, Trans. Ankara: Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Song, J. H., R. J. Murphy, R. Narayan, and G. B. H. Davies. 2009. Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 364 (1526):2127–39. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strungaru, S. A., G. Plavan, A. Ciobica, M. Nicoara, M. A. Robea, C. Solcan, and A. Petrovici. 2019. Toxicity and chronic effects of deltamethrin exposure on zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a reference model for freshwater fish community. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 171:854–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukma, E., S. Ramadhan, and V. Indriyani. 2020. Integration of environmental education in elementary schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1481 (1):012136. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012136.
   Google Scholar
• Tamrin, H., and D. Desnita. 2023. The Effect of Using Context-Based Learning Videos on Global Warming Materials on Students’ Problem-Solving Ability. Physics Education Research Journal 5 (1):21–8. doi: 10.21580/perj.2023.5.1.13082.
   Google Scholar
• Tsinakos, A. A., and B. Thanasis. 2009. A comparative survey on mind mapping tools. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 10 (3):55–67. doi: 10.17718/tojde.26941.
   Google Scholar
• Tyffani, D. M., S. B. Utomo, and S. B. Rahardjo. 2018. The need analysis of chemistry module based on REACT (relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating and transferring) to improve critical thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1022 (1):012017. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012017.
   Google Scholar
• Ultay, N., and M. Calık. 2011. Distinguishing 5E model from REACT strategy: An example of ‘acids and bases’ topic. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5 (2):199–220.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. C., C. C. Lee, and Y. C. Chu. 2010. A brief review on developing creative thinking in young children by mind mapping. International Business Research 3 (3):233. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v3n3p233.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, J. 2011. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Using mind mapsto facilitate participantrecall in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 16 (2):509–22. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-2/wheeldon.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, R. M., N. Sundararajan, O. O. Adesope, and K. R. Nishida. 2021. Static and interactive concept maps for chemistry learning. Educational Psychology 41 (2):206–23. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2020.1761299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, H. I., and F. Dagistanli. 2020. The effect of environment education supported by context-based learning approach on environmental attitudes, behaviors and success of 7th grade secondary school students. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Education 54:106–32. doi: 10.21764/maeuefd.620466.
   Google Scholar
• Yolida, B., R. R. T. Marpaung, and R. Handini. 2021. Problem based learning model using vee diagrams on students’ scientific literacy of environmental pollution material. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi) 6 (1):55–63. doi: 10.31932/jpbio.v6i1.834.
   Google Scholar