Distribution, population size and conservational status of the regionally endangered Large Banded Grasshopper (Arcyptera fusca) in Hungary (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

References

• Berg H-M, Bieringer G, Zechner L. 2005. Rote Liste der Heuschrecken (Orthoptera) Österreichs [Red list of grasshoppers (Orthoptera) in Austria]. In: Zulka KP, editor. Rote Listen gefährdeter Tiere Österreichs [Red list of endangered animals in Austria]. Wien: Böhlau; p. 167–209.
   Google Scholar
• Cizek O, Zamecnik J, Tropek R, Kocarek P, Konvicka M. 2012. Diversification of mowing regime increases arthropods diversity in species-poor cultural hay meadows. Journal of Insect Conservation. 16(2):215–226. doi:10.1007/s10841-011-9407-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couet J, Marjakangas EL, Santangeli A, Kålås JA, Lindström Å, Lehikoinen A. 2022. Short-lived species move uphill faster under climate change. Oecologia. 198:877–888. doi:10.1007/s00442-021-05094-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström A, Iuga AM, Lennartsson T. 2013. Managing biodiversity rich hay meadows in the EU: A comparison of Swedish and Romanian grasslands. Environmental Conservation. 40(2):194–205. doi:10.1017/S0376892912000458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhardt LL. 1978. Transect methods for population studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 42(1):1–31. doi:10.2307/3800685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson U. 2009. The rural landscapes of Europe: How man has shaped European nature. Stockholm: Formas.
   Google Scholar
• Erdélyi A, Nagy B, Puskás G, Szövényi G. 2017. The Orthoptera fauna of Börzsöny Mountains, Hungary. Articulata. 32:59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrig L. 2002. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: A synthesis. Ecological Applications. 12(2):346. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0346:EOHFOT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frouz J, Kindlmann P. 2015. Source-sink colonization as a possible strategy of insects living in temporary habitats. Plos One. 10(6):e0127743. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner T, Hill J, Chesmore D. 2005. Review of the methods frequently used to estimate the abundance of Orthoptera in grassland ecosystems. Journal of Insect Conservation. 9(3):151–173. doi:10.1007/s10841-005-2854-1.
   Google Scholar
• Harz K. 1975. Die Orthopteren Europas II. (The Orthoptera of Europe II.). The Hague: Dr. W Junk BV.
   Google Scholar
• Hochkirch A, Nieto A, García CM, Cálix M, Braud Y, Buzzetti FM, Chobanov D, Odé B, Presa AJJ, Willemse L, et al. 2016a. European Red List of grasshoppers, crickets and bush-crickets. Luxemburg: Publications office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Hochkirch A, Willemse LPM, Rutschmann F, Chobanov DP, Krištín A, Presa JJ, Szövényi G, Kleukers R. 2016b. Arcyptera fusca (Europe Assessment). The IUCN Red List Of Threatened Species 2016. E.T16084432a72594321 [cited 2023 Mar 20].
   Google Scholar
• Holuša J. 2012. Grasshoppers and bushcrickets regionally extinct in the Czech Republic: consequence of the disappearance of habitats scattered on the edge of their ranges. Journal of Insect Conservation. 16(6):949–960. doi:10.1007/s10841-012-9534-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iorgu I, Pisică E, Păis L, Lupu G, Iusan C. 2008. Checklist of Romanian Orthoptera (Insecta: Orthoptera) and their distribution by eco-regions. Travaux du Muséum D'Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa”. 51:119–135.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 2012. IUCN Red list categories and criteria. Version 3.1 Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 2022. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 15.1. IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee; [Revised 2022 Jul; cited 2023. Mar 20] Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kisbenedek T. 1997. Egyenesszárnyúak – Orthoptera. In: Forró, L., editor. Nemzeti Biodiverzitás-monitorozó Rendszer V. Rákok, szitakötők és egyenesszárnyúak. [Grasshoppers – Orthoptera. In: Forró, L., editor. National biodiversity monitoring system V. crustaceans, dragonflies and grasshoppers.] Budapest: Hungarian Natural History Museum; p. 55–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kosmidis I. 2023. brglm2: Bias Reduction in Generalized Linear Models. R package version 0.9.2, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=brglm2.
   Google Scholar
• Krištín A. 2000. Zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der bedrohten Arten Arcyptera fusca Pallas 1773 Und Pholidoptera frivaldskyi (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Tettigoniidae) in der Slowakei. [Distribution and Ecology of the Threatened Species Arcyptera fusca Pallas 1773 and Pholidoptera frivaldskyi (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Tettigoniidae) in Slovakia]. Linzer Biologische Beiträge. 32(2):753–761.
   Google Scholar
• Krištín A, Iorgu II. 2014. Red list of grasshoppers, Bush-crickets and Crickets (Orthoptera) of the Carpathian Mountains. In: Kadlečík J, editor. Carpathian red list of forest habitats and species. Carpathian list of invasive alien species. Slovakia: The Statue Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republik; p. 189–199.
   Google Scholar
• Kuster H, Keenleyside C. 2009. The origin and use of grasslands in Europe. In: Veen P, Jefferson R, De Smidt J, Van Der Straaten J, editors. Grasslands in Europe of high nature value. Zeist, Netherlands: KNNV publishing; p. 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Labaune C, Magnin F. 2002. Pastoral management vs. land abandonment in Mediterranean uplands: impact on land snail communities. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 11:237–245. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00280.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landmann A. 2017. Große Höckerschrecke Arcyptera fusca (Pallas, 1773). In: Zuna-Kratky T, Landmann A, Illich I, Zechner L, Essl F, Lechner K, Ortner A, Weißmair W, Wöss G, editors. Die Heuschrecken Österreichs. Denisia 39. Linz: Biologiezentrum Des Oberösterreichischen Landenmuseums; p. 646–650.
   Google Scholar
• László M, Somogyi J, Szövényi G. 2022. Population size and habitat use of the Large Banded Grasshopper (Arcyptera fusca) in Hungary – first steps of a regional conservation project. Poster session presented at: The third European congress on orthoptera conservation; Leiden, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy B. 1987. Vicinity as a modifying factor in the Orthoptera fauna of smaller biogeographical units. In: Baccetti B, editor. Evolutionary biology of orthopteroid insects. Chicester: Harwood Ltd; p. 377–385.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy B, Rácz I. 1996. Orthopteroid insects in the Bükk Mountains. In: Mahunka S, editor. The fauna of the Bükk National Park. Budapest: Hungarian Natural History Museum; p. 95–123.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy B, Rácz I, Varga Z. 1999. The orthopteroid insect fauna of the Aggtelek Karst region (NE Hungary) referring to zoogeography and nature conservation. In: Mahunka S, editor. The fauna of the aggtelek national park. Budapest: Hungarian Natural History Museum; p. 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy B, Šušlik V, Krištin A. 1998. Distribution of Orthoptera species and structure of assemblages along Slanské - Zemplén Mountains Range (SE Slovakia - NE Hungary). Folia Entomologica Hungarica. 59:17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy J. 2007. A Börzsöny hegység edényes flórája. Rosalia 2. kötet. [Vascular flora of the Börzsöny Mountains. Rosalia Vol.2.]. Budapest: Duna-Ipoly Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság.
   Google Scholar
• Popova KV, Molodtsov VV, Sergeev MG. 2020. Rare grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acridoidea) of the Baraba and Kulunda steppes (South Siberia). Acta Biologica Sibirica. 6:595–609. doi:10.3897/abs.6.e59519.
   Google Scholar
• Poniatowski D, Beckmann C, Löffler F, Münsch T, Helbing F, Samways MJ, Fartmann T. 2020. Relative impacts of land-use and climate change on grasshopper range shifts have changed over time. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 29(12): 1–13. doi:10.1111/geb.13188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruchniewicz D. 2017. Abandonment of traditionally managed mesic mountain meadows affects plant species composition and diversity. Basic and Applied Ecology. 20:2190–2202. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pungur J. 1899. Ordo Orthoptera. In: Paszlavszky J, editor. Fauna Regni Hungariae III. Arthropoda. Budapest: A. K. M. Természettudományi Társulat; p. 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rácz I, Nagy A, Jancsek E. 2005. Orthoptera collection of the Hungarian Natural History Museum (Budapest) II.: Caelifera. Folia Historico-Naturalia Musei Matraensis. 29:123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Sándor A, ed. 1983. Bükki Nemzeti Park [Bükk National Park]. Budapest: Mezőgazdasági Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov IM. 2000. How does insecticidal control of grasshoppers affect non-target arthropods? In: Lockwood JA, Latchininsky AV, Sergeev MG, editors. Grasshoppers and grassland health. Managing grasshopper outbreaks without risking environmental disaster. NATO Science Series 73. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 181–192.
   Google Scholar
• Somogyi J, László M, Szövényi G. 2021. A szép hegyisáska (Arcyptera fusca) bükki populációinak méretbecslése és élőhelyhasználata [Population size estimation and habitat use of the populations of the Large Banded Grasshopper (Arcyptera fusca) in Bükk Mts.]. Poster session presented at: 12. Magyar Ökológus Kongresszus [12th Congress of Hungarian Ecologists]; Vác, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Szanyi Sz, Debnár Zs, Nagy A, Rácz I, Varga Z. 2013. Fragmentált gyepek három védett egyenesszárnyúfajának (Orthoptera) metapopuláció-hálózata az Aggteleki-karszton [Metapopulation network of three protected grasshopper species (Orthoptera) on the fragmented grasslands of the Aggtelek Karst]. Állattani Közlemények. 98(1-2):97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Szirmai O, Saláta D, Benedek LK, Czóbel Sz. 2022. Investigation of the secondary succession of abandoned areas from different cultivation in the pannonian biogeographic region. Agronomy. 12(4):773. doi:10.3390/agronomy12040773.
   Google Scholar
• Tartally A, Nash DR, Varga Z, Lengyel Sz. 2019. Changes in host ant communities of Alcon Blue butterflies in abandoned mountain hay meadows. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 12(6):492–500. doi:10.1111/icad.12369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 268(1478): 1791–1796. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga Z. 1984. A tájvédelmi körzet állatvilága [The fauna in the natural reserve district]. In: Szeremley S, editor. Zempléni Tájvédelmi Körzet [Zemplén landscape protection area]. Miskolc: Révay Nyomda; p. 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Virók V, Farkas R, Farkas T, Boldoghné SzF, Vojtkó A, editors. 2014. A Gömör-Tornai-karszt flórája. Általános rész [Flora of the Gömör-Torna Karst. General part]. Jósvafő: Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság.
   Google Scholar