Are there ancient editions of Paul's letters?

Bibliography

• Allen, Garrick V. “Early Textual Scholarship on Acts: Observations from the Euthalian Quotation Lists.” Religions 13 (2022). doi:10.3390/rel13050435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Garrick V., Owen Conlan, Clare Conran, Christophe Debruyne, Troy Griffitts, Nishtha Jain, et al. “The New Testament in Virtual Research Environments: Titles, Greek Manuscripts, Data Querying.” Classics@ 18 (2021). https://classics-at.chs.harvard.edu/classics18-allen-conlan-conran-debruyne-griffitts-jain-nicholson-osullivan-rodenbiker-royle-schmid/.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Garrick V., and Kelsie G. Rodenbiker. “Titles of the New Testament (TiNT): A New Approach to Manuscripts and the History of Interpretation.” Early Christianity 11 (2020): 265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomkvist, Vemund. Euthalian Traditions: Text, Translation and Commentary. TU 170. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Carriker, Andrew James. The Library of Eusebius of Caesarea. VCSup 68. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Conybeare, F. C. “On the Codex Pamphili and Date of Euthalius.” Journal of Philology 23 (1895): 243–244.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Matthew R. The Eusebian Canon Tables: Ordering Textual Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Nils Alstrup. “Welche Ordnung der Paulusbrife wird vom Muratorischen Kanon vorausgesetzt?” ZNW 52 (1961): 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Nils Alstrup. The Crucified Messiah and Other Essays. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Nils Alstrup. Studies in Paul: Theology for the Early Christian Mission. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Nils Alstrup. “0230 (= PSI 1306) and the Fourth-Century Greek-Latin Edition of the Letters of Paul.” In Text and Interpretation: Studies in the New Testament Presented to Matthew Black, edited by E. Best, and R. McL. Wilson, 79–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Nils Alstrup. “Ephesians and Qumran.” In Studies in Ephesians: Introductory Questions, Text- & Edition-Critical Issues, Interpretation of Texts and Themes, edited by D. Hellholm, V. Blomkvist, and T. Fornberg, 107–144. WUNT 131. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Nils Alstrup. “The ‘Euthalian Apparatus’ and Affiliated ‘Argumenta.’” In Studies in Ephesians: Introductory Questions, Text- & Edition-Critical Issues, Interpretation of Texts and Themes, edited by D. Hellholm, V. Blomkvist, and T. Fornberg, 231–275. WUNT 131. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Devreesse, Robert. Introduction à l’étude des manuscrits grecs. Paris: Klincksieck, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrynina, Elina. “On the Dating of Codex H (Epistle of the Apostle Paul).” In Le livre manuscript grec: écritures, matériaux, histoire, edited by M. Cronier, and B. Mondain, 130–150. Paris: Association des Amis du Centre d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Duplacy, J. “Manuscrits grecs du Nouveau Testament émigré de la Grand Laure de l’Athos.” In Studia Codicologica, edited by K. True, 159–178. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrhard, Albert. “Der Codex H ad epistulas Pauli und ‘Euthalius diaconos.’.” Centralblatt für Biliothekwesen 8 (1891): 385–411.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, Elizabeth L. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Fewster, Gregory Peter. “Finding Your Place: Developing Cross-Reference Systems in Late Antique Biblical Codices.” In The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship, edited by G. V. Allen, 155–179. WUNT 417. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Frenschkowski, Marko. “Studien zur Geschichte der Bibliothek von Cäsarea.” In New Testament Manuscripts: Their Texts and Their World, edited by T. J. Kraus, and T. Nicklas, 53–104. TENT 2. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, Harry Y. Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts. London: Yale University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, Anthony, and Megan Williams. Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius, and the Library of Caesarea. London: Harvard University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, C. R. Textkritik des Neuen Testament. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Hinrichs’, 1900.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Karstein M. Nils Alstrup Dahl: A Bibliography of his Writings 1935–1991. Bibliography Series 3. Oslo: University of Oslo, Faculty of Theology, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. Rendel. “Stichometry. Part II.” The American Journal of Philology 4 (1883): 309–331.
   Google Scholar
• Hellholm, David, and Vemund Blomkvist. “Parainesis as an Ancient Genre-Designation: The Case of the ‘Euthalian Apparatus’ and ‘Affiliated Argumenta.’” In Early Christian Paraenesis in Context, edited by J. Starr, and T. Engberg-Pedersen, 467–519. BZAW 125. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmerdinger, Bertrand. “Euthaliana.” JTS 11 (1960): 349–355.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, H. A. G., and D. C. Parker, eds. Codex Zacynthius: Catena, Palimpsest, Lectionary. T&S 3/21. Piscataway: Gorgias, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, William A. Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel, Erik. “The Margin as Editorial Space: Upgrading Dioscorides alphabeticus in Eleventh-Century Monte Cassino.” In The Annotated Book in the Early Middle Ages: Practices of Reading and Writing, edited by M. Teeuwen, and I. van Renswoude, 323–341. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, T. J. “Arts of Memory, Ancient Manuscript Technologies, and the Aims of Theology.” Religions 13 (2022). doi:10.3390/rel13050426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lied, Liv Ingeborg. Invisible Manuscripts: Textual Scholarship and the Survival of 2 Baruch. STAC 128. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, Bruce, and John Gram. “Parsing Paul: Layout and Sampling Divisions in Pauline Commentaries.” In Commentaries, Caentae and Biblical Traditions, edited by H. A. G. Houghton, 99–116. TS 3/13. Piscataway: Gorgias, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Harold S. “On the Tet of Codices H and 93.” JBL 78 (1959): 228–237.
   Google Scholar
• Omont, M. H. Notice sur un très ancient manuscript grec en onciales de Épîtres de Saint Paul. Paris: Imprimerie nationale, 1889.
   Google Scholar
• Parpulov, Georgi R. Catena Manuscripts of the Greek New Testament. TS 3/25. Piscataway: Gorgias, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Petroelje, Benjamin J. The Pauline Book and the Dilemma of Ephesians. LNTS 665. London: T&T Clark, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Riggsby, Andrew M. Mosaics of Knowledge: Representing Information in the Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. Armitage. Euthaliana: Studies of Euthalius. Codex H of the Pauline Epistles, and the Armenian Version. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1895.
   Google Scholar
• Scherbenske, Eric W. Canonizing Paul: Ancient Editorial Practice and the Corpus Paulinum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Staab, Karl. Die Pauluskatenen nach den handschriftlichen Quellen untersucht. Rome: Verlag des päpstlichen Bibelinstituts, 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Trobisch, David. The First Edition of the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Van Seters, John. The Edited Bible: The Curious History of the ‘Editor’ in Biblical Criticism. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Von Soden, Hermann. Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments in ihrer ältesten eirreichbaren Textgestalt hergestellt auf Grund ihrer Textgeschichte. 2nd ed. Vol. 1/1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1911.
   Google Scholar
• Willard, Louis Charles. A Critical Study of the Euthalian Apparatus. ANTF 41. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zagacnius, Laurentius Alexander [Lorenzo Alessandro Zacagni]. Collectanea monumentorum veterum ecclesiæ græcæ, ac latinæ. Rome: Typis Sacra, 1698.
   Google Scholar
• Zuntz, Günther. The Ancestry of the Harklean New Testament. London: British Academy, 1945.
   Google Scholar
• Zuntz, Günther. “Euthalius = Euzoius?” Vigiliae Christianae 7 (1953): 16–22.
   Google Scholar