Discipline-Specific Writing and Embedded Clauses: The Case of Cell Biology and Classics

References

• Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benshams, Masoomeh, Firooz Sadighi, Mohammad Reza Falahati Qadimi Fumani, and Naser Rashidi. 2020. “A Probe into Discourse Structure of English Relative Clauses of Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading and Writing Performance: Centering Theory in Focus.” Cogent Arts & Humanities 7 (1): 1788841. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1788841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, Roger. 2018. English Grammar: A Resource Book for Students. 2nd ed. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2010. “Challenging Stereotypes About Academic Writing: Complexity, Elaboration, Explicitness.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 (1): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples, and Jesse Egbert. 2022. The Register-Functional Approach to Grammatical Complexity: Theoretical Foundation, Descriptive Research Findings, Application. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 2021. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Christopher S. 2003. Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. Part 2: From Clause to Discourse and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Ronald and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Edith A. 1941. “The Location of the Subordinate Clause in Oral and Written Language.” Child Development 12 (4): 333–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/1125600.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Daniel D. 1998. “Rationality Reborn: Historical Roots of the Passive Voice in Scientific Discourse.” In Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse: Methods, Practice, and Pedagogy, edited by John T. Battalio, 117–135. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant, Philip, Mark Brenchley, and Rebecca Clarkson. 2020. “Syntactic Development Across Genres in Children's Writing: The Case of Adverbial Clauses.” Journal of Writing Research 12 (2): 419–452. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.02.04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, Robin P. 2000. A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, Lise. 2013. Analysing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Stefan L. and Patty Ernst. 2019. “Judgements About Double-Embedded Relative Clauses Differ between Languages.” Psychological Research 83 (7): 1581–1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1014-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, Stefan L., Thijs Trompenaars, and Shravan Vasishth. 2016. “Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?” Cognitive Science 40 (3): 554–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesalingam, Mohan. 2013. The Language of Mathematics: A Linguistic and Philosophical Investigation. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grogan, Kathleen E. 2021. “Writing Science: What Makes Scientific Writing Hard and How to Make it Easier.” The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 102 (1): e01800. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1800.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1998. “Things and Relations: Regrammaticising Experience as Technical Knowledge.” In Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, edited by James R. Martin and Robert Veel, 185–237. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. “On the Grammar of Scientific English.” In The Language of Science, edited by Jonathan J. Webster, 181–198. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayot, Eric. 2014. The Elements of Academic Style: Writing for the Humanities. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Jingshan and Ming Tan. 2023. “The Role of ChatGPT in Scientific Communication: Writing Better Scientific Review Articles.” American Journal of Cancer Research 13 (4): 1148–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, Ken. 2015. “Genre, Discipline and Identity.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Roderick and Peter Rosenbaum. 1968. English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.
   Google Scholar
• Kerz, Elma and Daniel Wiechmann. 2015. “Register-Contingent Entrenchment of Constructional Patterns: Causal and Concessive Adverbial Clauses in Academic and Newspaper Writing.” Journal of English Linguistics 43 (1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214564364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George. 1968. Deep and Surface Grammar. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, Ping Alvin. 2021a. “The Passive Voice in Scholarly Writing: A Diachronic Look at Science and History.” Finnish Journal of Linguistics 34 (2021): 77–102.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, Ping Alvin. 2021b. “Writing in the Sciences and Humanities: A Clause-Complex Perspective.” WORD 67 (2): 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1909866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Peng, Meiting Li, Lili Tian, Jie Xiao, Guilin Xiang, Xizhi Ding, Xiang Qin, Rong Jiang, and Juan Liao. 2022. “Exploration and Practice of Blended Teaching of Cell Biology Experiments During the COVID-19 Epidemic.” Annals of Translational Medicine 10 (4): 232. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Susan Peck. 2010. Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Paula, Katy Ashton, Rachel Barratt, Doyle Simon, Dorrie Imeson, Amos Meir, and Gregoire Risser. 2015. “Clinical Realism: A New Literary Genre and a Potential Tool for Encouraging Empathy in Medical Students.” BMC Medical Education 15 (1): 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0372-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parkinson, Jean. 2013. “Adopting Academic Values: Student Use of That-Complement Clauses in Academic Writing.” System 41 (2): 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Repko, Allen F., Rick Szostak, and Michelle Phillips Buchberger. 2019. Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Writing. 2023. “Royal Literary Fund.” Accessed May 17. https://www.rlf.org.uk/resources/scientific-writing/.
   Google Scholar
• Scimago. 2021. “Scimago Journal and Country Rank.” http://www.scimagojr.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Shahriari, Hesamoddin, Farzaneh Shadloo, and Ahmad Ansarifar. 2018. “An Examination of Relative Clauses in Argumentative Essays Written by EFL Learners.” Journal of Language and Education 4 (4): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-4-77-87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, Shelley, Bethany Gray, Douglas Biber, and Jesse Egbert. 2023. “Writing Trajectories of Grammatical Complexity at the University: Comparing L1 and L2 English Writers in BAWE.” Applied Linguistics 44 (1): 46–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Craft (and Art) of Scientific Writing. 2023. Nature Cancer 4: 583–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-023-00579-y.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warchał, Krystyna. 2010. “Moulding Interpersonal Relations through Conditional Clauses: Consensus-Building Strategies in Written Academic Discourse.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 (2): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Aaron Steven and Kyle Rawlins. 2020. “Frequency, Acceptability, and Selection: A Case Study of Clause-embedding.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5 (1): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Writing in the Humanities. 2023. “Wikibooks.” Accessed May 13, 2023. https://human.libretexts.org/@go/page/100250.
   Google Scholar
• Writing in the Sciences. 2023. “Wikibooks.” Accessed May 13, 2023. https://human.libretexts.org/@go/page/100251.
   Google Scholar
• Zaiontz, Charles. 2022. “Real Statistics Using Excel.” Accessed May 14, 2023. http://www.real-statistics.com/.
   Google Scholar