Craniofacial measurements of Malaysian Malays, Chinese and Indians based on the analyses of post-mortem computed tomographic images

References

• Cattaneo C. Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millenium. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165:185–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefner JT, Ousley SD. Statistical classification methods for estimating ancestry using morphoscopic traits. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(4):883–890. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholts SB, Walker PL, Kuzminsky SC, Miller KWP, Wärmländer SKTS. Identification of group affinity from cross-sectional contours of the human midfacial skeleton using digital morphometrics and 3D laser scanning technology. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(2):333–338. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01701.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman DW. The places we will go: path forward in forensic anthropology. In: Ubelaker DH, editor. Forensic science: current issues, future directions. Somerset: Wiley; 2012. pp. 131–159.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner JK, Yu JH, Ifekwunigwe JO, Harrell TM, Bamshad MJ, Royal CD. Anthropologists’ view on race, ancestry and genetics. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017;162:318–327. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells WW. Cranial variation in man: a study by multivariate analysis of patterns of difference among recent human population. Pap Peabody Mus Archaeol Ethnol. 1973;67:1–259.
   Google Scholar
• Ousley S, Jantz R, Freid D. 2009. Understanding race and human variation: why forensic anthropologists are good at identifying race. Am J Biol Anthropol. 139:68–76. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21006
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Noor MS, Khoo LS, Alias WZZ, Hasmi AH, Ibrahim MA, Mahmood MS. The clandestine multiple graves in Malaysia: the first mass identification operation of human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;278:e410.1–410.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go MC, Jones AR, Algee-Hewitt BFB, Dudzik B, Hughes CE. Classification trends among contemporary Filipino crania using Fordisc 3.1. Forensic Anthropol. 2019;2(4):1–11. doi:10.5744/fa.2019.1005
   Google Scholar
• Hatin WI, Nur-Shafawati AR, Zahri M, Xu S, Jin L, Tan S, Rizman-Idid M, Zilfalil BA, Hugo T. Population genetic structure of Peninsular Malaysia Malay sub-ethnic groups. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18312. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim TO, Ding LM, Zaki M, Sulaiman AB, Fatimah S, Siti S, Tahir A, Maimunah AH. Distribution of body weight, height and body mass index in a national sample of Malaysian adults. Med J Malaysia. 2000;55:108–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seah SH, Jeevan NH, Othman MI, Jaya P, Ooi YS, Wong PC, Kee SS. STR data for the AmpFISTR identifier loci in three ethnic groups (Malay, Chinese, Indian) of the Malaysian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;138:134–137. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoff MA, Ramsthaler F, Krahahn J, De S, Deml U, Gille RJ, Grabherr S, Thali MJ, Kreutz K. Digital forensic osteology – possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;174:152–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin D. Forensic age estimation in human skeletal remains: current concepts and future directions. Legal Med. 2010;12:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viner M. Overview of advances in forensic radiological methods of human identification. In: Latham KE, Barterlink EJ Finnegan M, editors. New perspectives in forensic human skeletal identification. London: Academic Press; 2018. pp. 217–226.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L, Ramsthaler FP, Schuliar J, Lynnerup Y, Cattaneo N. 2009. The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review. Forensic Sci Int. 193:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedouit F, Telmon N, Costagliola R, Otal P, Florence LL, Joffre F, Rouge D. New identification possibilities with postmortem multislice computed tomography. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121:507–510. doi:10.1007/s00414-007-0200-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recheis W, Weber GW, Schafer K, Knapp R, Seidler H, zur Nedden D. Virtual reality and anthropology. Eur J Radiol. 1999;31:88–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill GW, Hughes SS, Bennett SM, Gilbert BM. Racial identification from the midfacial skeleton with special reference to American Indians and Whites. J Forensic Sci. 1988;33(1):92–99. doi:10.1520/JFS12440J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eifil M, Negida A. Sampling methods in clinical research; an educational review. Emergency. 2017;5(1):e52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. Los Angelas: SAGE Publications; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Langley NR, Jantz LM, Ousley SD, Jantz RL, Milner G. Data collection procedure for forensic skeletal material 2.0. Knoxville, Tennessee: The University of Tennessee; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg SM, Scott NM, Neiswanger K. Intraobserver error associated with measurements of the hand. Am J Hum Biol. 2005;17:368–371. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW, Knapp RH. Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990;82:283–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisham S, Ibrahim MA, Mamat CR. Multivariate statistical analysis for race variation from foot anthropometry in the Malaysian population. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2012;44(3):285–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisham S, Flavel A, Abdullah N, Mohamad Noor MH, Franklin D. Quantification of spheno-occipital synchondrosis fusion in a contemporary Malaysian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;284C:78–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisham S, Abdullah N, Mohamad Noor MH, Franklin D. Quantification of secondary dentin formation based on the analyses of MDT scans and dental orthopantomographs in a contemporary Malaysian population. Legal Med. 2019;36:59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soon LP, Abdullah N, Mohamad Noor MH, Hadi H. Stature estimation of the Malaysian population based on sacrum CT scans. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2020;10:18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill GW, Gilbert BM. Race identification from the midfacial skeleton: American Blacks and Whites. In: Gill G Rhine S, editors. Skeletal attribution of race. Albuquerque (NM): Maxwell Museum of Anthropology; 1990. pp. 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sledzik PS, Ousley S. Analysis of six Vietnamese trophy skulls. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36(2):520–530. doi:10.1520/JFS13053J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A. Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229:e158.1–158.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo EJ, Jung H, Tansatit T. 2018. Cranial index in a modern people of Thai ancestry. Anat Cell Biol. 51(1):25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayashi A, Pietrusewsky M. Discriminant function analysis of craniometric data for distinguishing Japanese and Filipino crania. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2022:1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2022.2057589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongkasuriyachai NP, Prasitwattanaseree S, Case T, Mahakkanukrauh P. Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese individuals. Craniometric estimation of ancestry in Thai and Japanese. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2020. doi:10.1080/00450618.2020.1789219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrusewsky M. A multivariate analysis of measurements recorded in early and more modern crania from East Asia and Southeast Asia. Quat Int. 2010;211:42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techataweewan N, Hefner JT, Freas L, Surachotmongkorn N, Benchawhattananon R, Tyles N. Metric sexual dimorphism of the skull in Thailand. Forensic Sci Int Rep. 2021;4(100236):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Woo EJ, Jung H, Tansatit T. Cranial index in a modern people of Thai ancestry. Anat Cell Biol. 2018;51(1):25–30. doi:10.5115/acb.2018.51.1.25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spradley MK, Jantz RL. Ancestry estimation in forensic anthropology: geometric morphometric versus standard and nonstandard interlandmark distances. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61(4):892–897. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn DIG, Turner P. The measurement of skull shape and size. J Anat. 1960;94(1):82–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manabe J. Analysis of midfacial human cranial morphology in Japanese, American White, and American Black individuals using the digitized angle method. Forensic Anthropol. 2019;2(4):322–331. doi:10.5744/fa.2019.1006
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MG, Saw A, Ohtsuki F, Lestrel PE, Kamarul T. Change in facial shape in two cohorts of Japanese adult female students twenty years apart. Singapore Med J. 2011;52:818–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasai K, Richards LC, Brown T. Comparative study of craniofacial morphology in Japanese and Australian aboriginal populations. Hum Biol. 1993;65:821–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson ML, Tallman SD. 2019. Nonmetric cranial trait variation and ancestry estimation in Asian and Asian-derived groups. J Forensic Sci. 65:692–706. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Statistics Malaysia. Population distribution and basic demographic characteristics report 2010. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Department of Statistics Malaysia; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera M, Tallman S. 2019. Craniometric variation and ancestry estimation in two contemporary Caribbean populations. Forensic Sci Int. 305:110013. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranioti EF, García-Donas JG, Can IO, Ekizoglu O. Ancestry estimation of three Mediterranean populations based on cranial metrics. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;286:e265.1–265.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudzik B. Examining cranial morphology of Asian and Hispanic populations using geometric morphometrics for ancestry estimation. Forensic Anthropol. 2019;2(4):304–315. doi:10.5744/fa.2019.1022
   Google Scholar