References
- Roux C, Bucht R, Crispino F, De Forest P, Lennard C, Margot P, Miranda MD, NicDaeid N, Ribaux O, Ross A, et al. The Sydney declaration–revisiting the essence of forensic science through its fundamental principles. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;332:111182. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111182
- Koehler JJ, Mnookin JL, Saks MJ. The scientific reinvention of forensic science. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2023;120(41):e2301840120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2301840120
- Crispino F, Weyermann C, Delémont O, Roux C, Ribaux O. Towards another paradigm for forensic science? Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Forensic Sci. 2022;4(3):e1441. doi:10.1002/wfs2.1441
- Morrison GS. Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: the rise of forensic data science. Forensic Sci Int: Synergy. 2022;5:100270. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100270
- Wickenheiser RA. Reimagining forensic science – the mission of the forensic laboratory. Forensic Sci Int: Synergy. 2021;3:100153. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100153
- Weyermann C, Willis S, Margot P, Roux C. Towards more relevance in forensic science research and development. Forensic Sci Int. 2023;348:111592. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111592
- Saks MJ, Koehler JJ. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science. 2005;309(5736):892–895. doi:10.1126/science.1111565
- Edmond G, Found B, Martire K, Ballantyne K, Hamer D, Searston R, Thompson M, Cunliffe E, Kemp R, San Roque M, et al. Model forensic science. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2016;48(5):496–537. doi:10.1080/00450618.2015.1128969
- Bowen RT. Ethics and the practice of forensic science. CRC Press; 2017.
- De Baere T, Dmitruk W, Magnusson B, Meuwly D, O’Donnell G. Guidelines for the single laboratory validation of instrumental and human based methods in forensic science. ENSFI Standing Committee For Qual Competence (QCC). 2014;1:56–57.
- Cole SA. Forensic culture as epistemic culture: the sociology of forensic science. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C: Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2013;44(1):36–46. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.003
- Spain RD, Hedge JW, Ohse D, White A. The need for research-based tools for personnel selection and assessment in the forensic sciences. Forensic Sci Int: Synergy. 2022;4:100213. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100213
- Cole SA. Scandal, fraud, and the reform of forensic science: the case of fingerprint analysis. W Va L Rev. 2016;119:523.
- Cole SA. Individualization is dead, long live individualization! Reforms of reporting practices for fingerprint analysis in the United States. Law Probab Risk. 2014;13(2):117–150. doi:10.1093/lpr/mgt014
- Mattijssen EJ, Witteman CL, Berger CE, Zheng XA, Soons JA, Stoel RD. Firearm examination: examiner judgments and computer‐based comparisons. J Forensic Sci. 2021;66(1):96–111.
- Meuwly D, Ramos D, Haraksim, R. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;276:142–153.
- Galante N, Cotroneo R, Furci D, Lodetti G, Casali MB. Applications of artificial intelligence in forensic sciences: Current potential benefits, limitations and perspectives. Int J Legal Med. 2023;137(2):445–458. doi:10.1007/s00414-022-02928-5
- Antona M, Margetis G, Ntoa S, Degen H. Special issue on AI in HCI. 2023;1–4.
- Rakoff JS, Liu G. Forensic science: A judicial perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2023;120(41):e2301838120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2301838120