Public reason, non-public reasons, and the accessibility requirement

References

• Audi, R. 2011. Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billingham, P. 2016. “Convergence Justifications Within Political Liberalism: A Defence.” Res Publica 22 (2): 135–153. doi:10.1007/s11158-015-9278-x.
   Google Scholar
• Boettcher, J. 2012. “The Moral Status of Public Reason.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (2): 156–177. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00386.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettcher, J. 2015. “Against the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1): 191–208. doi:10.1007/s10677-014-9519-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, B. 2018. “Public Reason – Honesty, Not Sincerity.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 26 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1111/jopp.2018.26.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle, C. 2002. Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle, C. 2009. “Basic Human Worth and Religious Restraint.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 35 (1–2): 151–181. doi:10.1177/0191453708098759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle, C. 2011. “Consensus, Convergence, and Religiously Justified Coercion.” Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (4): 281–303.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S. 2007. Rawls. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. 2003. Contemporary Theories of Liberalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. 2004. “The Diversity of Comprehensive Liberalisms.” In Handbook of Political Theory, edited by G. F. Gaus and C. Kukathas, 100–114. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. 2007. “On Justifying the Moral Rights of the Moderns: A Case of Old Wine in New Bottles.” In Liberalism: Old and New, edited by F. D. Ellen Frankel, M. Jr., and J. Paul, 84–119. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. 2010. “The Place of Religious Belief in Public Reason Liberalism.” In Multiculturalism and Moral Conflict, edited by M. Dimova-Cookson and P. M. R. Stirk, 19–37. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. 2011. The Order of Public Reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G., and K. Vallier. 2009. “The Roles of Religious Conviction in a Publicly Justified Polity.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 35 (1–2): 51–76. doi:10.1177/0191453708098754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, G., and S. Macedo. 2012. “Rational Reasonableness: Toward a Positive Theory of Public Reason.” Law and Ethics of Human Rights 6 (1): 7–46. doi:10.1515/1938-2545.1066.
   Google Scholar
• Kogelmann, B., and S. Stich. 2016. “When Public Reason Fails Us: Convergence Discourse as Blood Oath.” American Political Science Review 110 (3): 717–730. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000290.
   Google Scholar
• North, R. 2012. “Public Reason, Religious Restraint and Respect.” Philosophia 40 (2): 179–193. doi:10.1007/s11406-011-9349-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallikkathayil, J. 2017. “Resisting Rawlsian Political Liberalism.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 45 (4): 413–426. doi:10.1111/papa.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quong, J. 2011. Liberalism without Perfection. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quong, J. 2013. “Public Reason.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2013 Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/public-reason/
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1999. The Law of Peoples: with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. In The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, M. 2011. “The Sincerity of Public Reason.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (4): 375–398. doi:10.1111/jopp.2011.19.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrasher, J., and K. Vallier. 2015. “The Fragility of Consensus: Public Reason, Diversity, and Stability.” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (4): 933–954. doi:10.1111/ejop.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyndal, J. 2016. “Moderate Idealization and Information Acquisition Responsibilities.” Res Publica 22 (4): 445–462. doi:10.1007/s11158-015-9295-9.
   Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. 2011a. “Against Public Reason Liberalism’s Accessibility Requirement.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3): 366–389. doi:10.1163/174552411X588991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. 2011b. “Convergence and Consensus in Public Reason.” Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (4): 261–280.
   Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. 2014. Liberal Politics and Public Faith. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. 2016. “In Defense of the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification: A Reply to Boettcher.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1): 255–266. doi:10.1007/s10677-015-9605-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weithman, P. 2010. Why Political Liberalism? New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolterstorff, N. 2012. Understanding Liberal Democracy, edited by T. Cuneo. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar