Can playing defense yield gains? Examining the relationships among regulatory focus, innovation, and SME performance

References

• Adomako, S. (2017). CEO’s regulatory foci and firm-level innovativeness in competitive environments. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(5), 640–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2016-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aidis, R., Mickiewicz, T., & Sauka, A. (2008). Why are optimistic entrepreneurs successful? An application of the regulatory focus theory. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 214, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. (1993). From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings. In J. A. Katz & R. H. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (pp. 145–195). JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran, S. (2006). Incremental innovation and business performance: Small and medium-size food enterprises in a concentrated industry environment. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. A., Hart, M., & Wainwright, T. (2013). Small business performance: Business, strategy and owner-manager characteristics. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001311298394
   Google Scholar
• Branzei, O., & Vertinsky, I. (2006). Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitzman, A., & Hicks, D. (2008, November). An analysis of small business patents by industry and firm size. Faculty Scholarship for the College of Science & Mathematics. 12. https://rdw.rowan.edu/csm_facpub/12
   Google Scholar
• Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockner, J., Higgins, E. T., & Low, M. B. (2004). Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00007-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, P. (2009). Self-regulation and moral awareness among entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certo, S. T., Busenbark, J. R., Woo, H., & Semadeni, M. (2016). Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2639–2657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processeses, 69(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., Szabat, K., & Evan, W. (1989). The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00746.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B., Jr. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, R., & Dutton, J. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, T. C., Aaron, J. R., McDowell, W. C., Urban, D. J., & Geho, P. R. (2017). The impact of leadership on small business innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4876–4881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible industry 4.0: A scenario-based approach to learning for the future of production. Procedia CIRP, 54, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.162
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., Frese, M., Mertins, J. C., Hardt, J. V., Thomas, F., Schauder, J., Schmitz, M., & Jette, W. (2014). Climate for personal initiative and radical and incremental innovation in firms: A validation study. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 22(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495814500046
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, D., Mauer, R., & Brettel, M. (2018). Regulatory focus theory and sustainable entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(2), 408–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2015-0269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freixanet, J., & Rialp, J. (2022). Disentangling the relationship between internationalization, incremental and radical innovation, and firm performance. Global Strategy Journal, 12(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, R. J. (2010). Locating innovation: The endogeneity of technology, organizational structure, and financial contracting. Columbia Law Review, 110, 885–917. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K64J5R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, H., & Higgins, T. (2003). Optimism, promotion pride, and prevention pride as predictors of quality of life. Personality and Social Psychology, 29(12), 1521–1532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronums, S., Verreynne, M. L., & Kastelle, T. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headd, B. (2021). Science/high-tech workers and small firms. Small Business Facts – US Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy Report. https://cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/30103659/High-Tech-Workers-And-Small-Firms.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M. P., Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., & Johnson, G. (2015). Off to plan or out to lunch? Relationships between design characteristics and outcomes of strategy workshops. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. The American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. The American Psychologist, 55(10), 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113(3), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmieleski, K., & Baron, R. (2009). Regulatory focus and new venture performance: A study of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation under conditions of risk versus uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, B. (2014). Linking business models with technological innovation performance through organizational learning. European Management Journal, 32(4), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., & Hughes, M. (2020). Radical innovation in family firms: A systematic analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(6), 1199–1234. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2019). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219871976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafetzopoulos, D., & Psomas, E. (2015). The impact of innovation capability on the performance of manufacturing companies: The Greek case. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(1), 104–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2012-0117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (2006). A guide to econometrics. Walden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschenhofer, F., & Lechner, C. (2012). Performance drivers of serial entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurial and team experience. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(3), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551211227693
   Google Scholar
• Landoni, P., Dell’Era, C., Ferraloro, G., Karlsson, H., Peradotto, M., & Verganti, R. (2016). Design contribution to the competitive performances of SMEs: The role of design innovation capabilities. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(4), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M., & Montgomery, D. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lux, A. A., Romero, F. R., & Brown, K. A. (2020). Putting the entrepreneur back into entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 1011–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2020-0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Pinzón-Castro, S. Y., & Kumar, V. (2018). Innovation capabilities and performance: Are they truly linked in SMEs? International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(8), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2017-0139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzarol, T., Reboud, S., & Soutar, G. N. (2009). Strategic planning in growth oriented small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 15(4), 320–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550910967912
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R., & Strong, C. A. (2003). Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation. Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00218-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K. (2021). The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business models – a comparison between SMEs and large enterprises. European Management Journal, 39(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Filippini, R., Forza, C., Vinelli, A., & Hii, J. (2001). A framework for analysing business performance, firm innovation and related contextual factors: Perceptions of managers and policy makers in two European regions. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060110384307
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, P., & Coad, A. (2016). Challenging assumptions and bias in entrepreneurship research. In H. Landström (Ed.), Challenging entrepreneurship research. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and diffusion in small firms: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6(5), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cass, A., & Sok, P. (2014). The role of intellectual resources, product innovation capability, reputational resources and marketing capability combinations in firm growth. International Small Business Journal, 32(8), 996–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613480225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oke, A., Burke, G., & Myers, A. (2007). Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710756974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida, V., & Örtqvist, D. (2015). Interactive effects of network capability, ICT capability, and financial slack on technology‐based small firm innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2019). Inbound open innovation activities in high‐tech SMEs: The impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romijn, H. A., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronic and software firms in Southeast England. Research Policy, 31(7), 1053–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00176-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapienza, H. J., Smith, K. G., & Gannon, M. J. (1988). Using subjective evaluations of organizational performance in small business research. American Journal of Small Business, 12(3), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801200304
   Google Scholar
• Saunila, M. (2020). Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2012). Too much of a good thing? Trade-offs in promotion and prevention focus. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109351241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somohano-Rodríguez, F. M., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & López-Fernández, J. M. (2020). Does industry 4.0 really matter for SME innovation? Journal of Small Business Management, 60(4), 1001–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1780728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, R., Kumar, K., & Strandholm, K. (2009). The role of organizational competencies in the market‐orientation‐performance relationship: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 19(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569210910939645
   Google Scholar
• Szozda, N. (2017). Industry 4.0 and its impact on the functioning of supply chains. LogForum, 13(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2017.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taren, Y., Boer, H., & Lindgren, P. (2015). A business model innovation typology. Decision Sciences, 46(2), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., & Braun, R. (2012). In the eye of the beholder: How regulatory focus and self-efficacy interact in influencing opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(6), 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ţurcan, R. V., Mäkelä, M. M., Sørensen, O. J., & Rönkkö, M. (2010). Mitigating theoretical and coverage biases in the design of theory-building research: An example from international entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal, 6(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0122-7
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.2307/258398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossen, R. (1998). Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation. International Small Business Journal, 16(3), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242698163005
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J., Little, L., Hill, A., & Ridge, J. (2010). CEO regulatory foci, environmental dynamism, and small firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(4), 580–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, T. D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., & West, M. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Lu, Y., Zhao, Y., Gong, S., & Li, B. (2013). Organisational unlearning, organisational flexibility and innovation capability: An empirical study of SMEs in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 61(2), 132–155. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2013.052178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. C. (1991). Environmental interest group behavior and self-selection bias in contingent valuation mail surveys. Growth and Change, 22(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1991.tb00538.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woschke, T., Haase, H., & Kratzer, J. (2017). Resource scarcity in SMEs: Effects on incremental and radical innovations. Management Research Review, 40(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., McMullen, J. S., Neubert, M. J., & Yi, X. (2008). The influence of leader regulatory focus on employee creativity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, J. Y., Yeung, A. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2008). Radical innovations in new product development and their financial performance implications: An event study of US manufacturing firms. Operations Management Research, 1(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-009-0017-3
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Fang, H., Dou, J., & Chrisman, J. J. (2022). Endogeneity issues in family business research: Current status and future recommendations. Family Business Review, 35(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211049092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar