FsQCA in entrepreneurship research: Opportunities and best practices

References

• Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, M., & Thiem, A. (2020). Often trusted but never (properly) tested: Evaluating qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 279–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117701487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon, M. J., Jones, P., & Pickernell, D. (2020). Country-level entrepreneurial attitudes and activity through the years: A panel data analysis using FsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 115, 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, S., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2020). The tangled historical roots of entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(4), 616–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, E. J., Shepherd, D. A., & Prentice, C. (2020). Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis for a finer-grained understanding of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 105970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sawy, O. A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2010). Research commentary—seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to tango. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretical approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P., Marx, A., & Cambré, B. (2013). Chapter 1 Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research: Introduction. In P. C. Fiss, B. Cambré, & A. Marx (Eds.), Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research (Vol. 38, pp. 1–22). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0000038005
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research–the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google scholar, web of science, and scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. D., Gaba, V., & Colwell, K. A. (2005). Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organization Science, 16(5), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195. https://doi.org/10.2307/256809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management science, 30(10), 1161–1183. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. V. (2017). Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, P., Kibler, E., Mandakovic, V., & Amorós, J. E. (2020). Local entrepreneurial ecosystems as configural narratives: A new way of seeing and evaluating antecedents and outcomes. Research Policy, 104065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikou, S., Brännback, M., Carsrud, A. L., & Brush, C. G. (2019). Entrepreneurial intentions and gender: Pathways to start-up. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 348–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-04-2019-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behaviour with FsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parente, T. C., & Federo, R. (2019). Qualitative comparative analysis: Justifying a neo-configurational approach in management research. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, G. T. (2006). Examining configurations and firm performance in a suboptimal equifinality context. Organization Science, 17(6), 756–770. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy set and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net Effects Analysis Versus Configurational Analysis: An Empirical Demonstration. In C. Ragin (Ed.), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (pp. 190–212). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rediker, K., & Seth, A. (1995). Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rippa, P., Ferruzzi, G., Holienka, M., Capaldo, G., & Coduras, A. (2020). What drives university engineering students to become entrepreneurs? Finding different recipes using a configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1790291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, F., Karadağ, H., & Tuncer, B. (2019). Big five personality traits, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention: A configurational approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 25(6), 1188–1211. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2018-0466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, S. C., Nikou, S., Brännback, M., & Liguori, E. W. (2021). Are social and traditional entrepreneurial intentions really that different? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 27(7), 1891–1911. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroe, S., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2018). Effectuation or causation: An fsQCA analysis of entrepreneurial passion, risk perception, and self-efficacy. Journal of Business Research, 89, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedula, S., & Fitza, M. (2019). Regional recipes: A configurational analysis of the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem for US venture capital-backed start-ups. Strategy Science, 4(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2019.0076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham-Crowley, T. (1992). Guerrillas and revolution in Latin America: A comparative study of insurgents and Regimes since 1956. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G. (2015). Constructing business-to-business marketing models that overcome the limitations in variable-based and case-based research paradigms. Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing, 22(1–2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2015.1021589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoruk, E., & Jones, P. (2020). Firm-environment alignment of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation in technology-based ventures: A configurational approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1800354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar