Heroes of the Green Room – How able successors revitalize and reinvent family firms

References

• Adams, R., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Understanding the relationship between founder–ceos and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2015). Using multilevel modeling and mixed methods to make theoretical progress in microfoundations for strategy research. Strategic Organization, 13(4), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015594622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, J. (2020). The succession question and the family firm: A theoretical, conceptual, and historical reflection. The Entrepreneurship SIG at the European Academy of Management: New Horizons with Strong Traditions, 2, 109–139.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, J., Calabrò, A., Huybrechts, J., & Woywode, M. (2019). The enigma of the family successor–firm performance relationship: A methodological reflection and reconciliation attempt. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 43(3), 437–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718816290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, J., Landman, A., & Woywode, M. J. (2015). Gender preferences in CEO successions in family firms: Family characteristics and human capital of the successor. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, J., Uhlaner, L., Woywode, M., & Zybura, J. (2018). “Shadow emperor” or “loyal paladin”? – the Janus face of previous owner involvement in family firm successions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcorn, P. B. (1982). Success and survival in the family-owned firm. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. (1990, August). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1990, No. (1), pp. 160–164). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. (1993). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arregle, J., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1996). Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 359–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(96)84701-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, V. L., III, & Duhaime, I. M. (1997). Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<13:AID-SMJ843>3.0.CO;2-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (2007). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed., 7. print). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, B. (1975). The development of organisation structure in the family firm. Journal of General Management, 3(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630707500300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N., Brüderl, J., & Woywode, M. J. (2008). Momentum or deceleration? Theoretical and methodological reflections on the analysis of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32625943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, B. K., Riley, R. A., & Yang, Y. (2005). The value of an heir apparent in succession planning. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647–691. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera-Suárez, M. K., García-Almeida, D. J., & Saá-Pérez, P. D. (2018). A dynamic network model of the successor’s knowledge construction from the resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 31(2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518776867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrò, A., Minichilli, A., Amore, M. D., & Brogi, M. (2018). The courage to choose! Primogeniture and leadership succession in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(7), 2014–2035. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, B., Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2008). Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Rowe, W. (1995). Leader capabilities, succession, and competitive context: A study of professional baseball teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie, A. (1889). Wealth. The North American Review, 148(391), 653–664.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, A. (1933). The advantage of poverty. In A. Carnegie (Ed.), The gospel of wealth, and other timely essays (pp. 50–77). Doubleday, Doran & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, M., Zhao, J., & Zhu, L. (2019). Lean innovation: Family firm succession and patenting strategy in a dynamic institutional landscape. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 100247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, W. F. (2002). Strategies for responsible restructuring. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(3), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.8540331
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Hambrick, D. C. (2012). CEO replacement in turnaround situations: Executive (mis)fit and its performance implications. Organization Science, 23(1), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirico, F., & Nordqvist, M. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal, 28(5), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610370402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00035.x
   Google Scholar
• Coad, A., Holm, J. R., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2018). Firm age and performance. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0532-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coch, L., & French, J. R. P., Jr. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1(4), 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674800100408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00827.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daspit, J. J., Holt, D. T., Chrisman, J. J., & Long, R. G. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515599688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, A., & Parada, M. J. (2019). Corporate governance in family businesses across generations: Exploring intergenerational issues. In E. Memili & C. Dibrell (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of heterogeneity among family firms (pp. 115–139). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. The Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1086/261354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (1987). Strategy and structural adjustment to regain fit and performance: In defence of contingency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 24(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00444.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2004). Private benefits of control: An international comparison. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 537–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00642.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, I., Rondi, E., & Massis, A. D. (2020). Managing the tradition and innovation paradox in family firms: A family imprinting perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 44(1), 20–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719839712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiegener, M. K., Brown, B. M., Prince, R. A., & File, K. M. (1994). A comparison of successor development in family and nonfamily businesses. Family Business Review, 7(4), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00313.x
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W., & Scotch, N. A. (1964). Scapegoating in baseball. The American Journal of Sociology, 70(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/223739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstein, D. L., & Reilly, N. P. (1985). Group decision making under threat: The tycoon game. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.5465/256117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00889.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Greiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4), 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyer, P. H., & Spender, J.‑C. (1979). Recipes, crises, and adaptation in mature businesses. International Studies of Management & Organization, 9(3), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1979.11656274
   Google Scholar
• Haddadj, S. (2003). Organization change and the complexity of succession. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810310468107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 844–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/256761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A., Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2001). Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review, 14(3), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00193.x
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (1983a). Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow’s strategic types. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/256132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (1983b). Turnaround strategies for mature industrial-product business units. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.5465/255972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler, W. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 15(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879001500105
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, C., & Block, J. (2020). Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A replication and extension meta-analysis. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00158
   Google Scholar
• Harrigan, K. R. (1980). Strategies for declining businesses. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., Martinez, J. I., & Ward, J. L. (1994). Is strategy different for the family-owned business? Family Business Review, 7(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00159.x
   Google Scholar
• Hauck, J., & Prügl, R. (2015). Innovation activities during intra-family leadership succession in family firms: An empirical study from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A. (1993). Ghosts of managers past: Managerial succession and organizational mortality. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.5465/256762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg, B. L. T., Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herriau, C., & Touchais, L. (2015). The role of control systems in the process of change: Application to a family business succession. Journal of Change Management, 15(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2014.922603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrand, S., & Teichert, T. (2020). Successor selection in times of continuity and renewal - a discrete choice-experiment. WiSo-HH Working Paper Series No. 59.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, D., & McColgan, P. (2009). Firm performance and managerial succession in family managed firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3–4), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, C. W. (1980). Turnaround strategies. The Journal of Business Strategy, 1(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb038886
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, T. R., Holmes, R. M., Jr., & Connelly, B. L. (2009). Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtz-Eakin, D., Joulfaian, D., & Rosen, H. S. (1993). The Carnegie conjecture: Some empirical evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(2), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, J., Voordeckers, W., & Lybaert, N. (2013). Entrepreneurial risk taking of private family firms. Family Business Review, 26(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512469252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., & Rau, S. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative science quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Florencino, L.D.S., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerlander, N., Dessì, C., Bird, M., Floris, M., & Murru, A. (2015). The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation. Family Business Review, 28(4), 332–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515607777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. N. (2008). Are U.S. CEOs overpaid? Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(2), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.32739755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieser, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2010). Organisation (6th ed.). überarbeitete Auflage. Schäffer-Poeschel.
   Google Scholar
• Lansberg, I. S. (1983). Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(83)90025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansberg, I. S., & Astrachan, J. H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review, 7(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00039.x
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 12(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, P., Kenway-Smith, W., Hart, A., Morris, T., Ainsworth, J., Beterlsen, E., & Pasari, V. (1990). Managing the family business in the U.K.: A stoy hayward survey in conjunction with the London Business School. Stoy Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Le Breton–Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2015). Learning stewardship in family firms: For family, by family, across the life cycle. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(3), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2016). Family firms and practices of sustainability: A contingency view. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löhde, A. S. K., Calabrò, A., & Torchia, M. (2020). Understanding the main drivers of family firm longevity: The role of business family learning. International Studies of Management & Organization, 50(2), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2020.1758421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003600
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McConaughy, D. L. (2000). Family CEOs vs. nonfamily CEOs in the family-controlled firm: An examination of the level and sensitivity of pay to performance. Family Business Review, 13(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00121.x
   Google Scholar
• Meindl, J. R., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1987). The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/255897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1990). The Icarus Paradox: How exceptional companies bring about their own downfall. new lessons in the dynamics of corporate success, decline, and renewal. Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1991). Stale in the saddle: Ceo tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 37(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.1.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1993). Some organizational consequences CEO succession. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.5465/256597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1994). Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Administrative science quarterly, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1980). Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.2307/255551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Le Breton-miller, I. (2006). Lessons from family firms about managing for the long run. Leader to Leader, 2006(39), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.160
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Steier, L., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichilli, A., Nordqvist, M., Corbetta, G., & Amore, M. D. (2014). CEO succession mechanisms, organizational context, and performance: A socio-emotional wealth perspective on family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1153–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs.
   Google Scholar
• Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2012). Mixed methods research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110393023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morewedge, C. K. (2015). Utility: Anticipated, experienced, and remembered. In G. Keren & G. Wu (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (Vol. 1, pp. 295–330). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). SAGE Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. H., Williams, R. O., Allen, J. A., & Avila, R. A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussolino, D., & Calabrò, A. (2014). Paternalistic leadership in family firms: Types and implications for intergenerational succession. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. O. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050–1073. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change (4th ed.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, M., Wennberg, K., Bau’, M., & Hellerstedt, K. (2013). An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1087–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9466-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1984). To avoid organizational crises, unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12(4), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(84)90011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo-Del-Val, M. (2009). Succession in family firms from a multistaged perspective. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0092-1
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S. C. (2016). Family firms and the “willing successor” problem. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 40(6), 1241–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-González, F. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. The American Economic Review, 96(5), 1559–1588. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependency perspective. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Creating and sustaining superior performance competitive advantage. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. V. V. (1990). Neither markets nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107303349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu Lefebvre, M. (2021). The successors conundrum: A moral dilemma. In M. R. Allen & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), Family entrepreneurship (pp. 173–182). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1993). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room. Sloan management review, 34(2), 85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Cal. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1996). A review and annotated bibliography of family business studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovin, M. B., & Sushka, M. E. (1993). Ownership concentration, corporate control activity, and firm value: Evidence from the death of inside blockholders. The Journal of Finance, 48(4), 1293–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04755.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, C., & Vertinsky, I. (1977). Designs for crisis decision units. Administrative science quarterly, 22(4), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. F., & Amoako-Adu, B. (1999). Management succession and financial performance of family controlled firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(4), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00010-3
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenfeld, J. A., & Spence, P. L. (1989). The parting patriarch of a family firm. Family Business Review, 2(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.tb00004.x
   Google Scholar
• Stalk, G., & Foley, H. (2012). Avoid the traps that can destroy family businesses. Harvard Business Review, 90(1/2), 25–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. I. (1987). The process of organizational death: Disbanding and reconnecting. Administrative science quarterly, 32(4), 542–569. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trow, D. B. (1961). Executive succession in small companies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171–222.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahnemann, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, A. H., Ganco, M., & Hinings, C. R. (2013). Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 393–440. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.774981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., & Prescott, J. E. (1990). Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management, 11(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent Ponroy, J., Lê, P., & Pradies, C. (2019). In a family way? A model of family firm identity maintenance by non-family members. Organization Studies, 40(6), 859–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619836707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volberda, H. W., van der Weerdt, N., Verwaal, E., Stienstra, M., & Verdu, A. J. (2012). Contingency fit, institutional fit, and firm performance: A metafit approach to organization–environment relationships. Organization Science, 23(4), 1040–1054. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, D., Block, J. H., Miller, D., Schwens, C., & Xi, G. (2015). A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms: Another attempt. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (1987). Organizational growth and decline processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002003
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, L. P., & James, E. H. (2008). Linking crisis management and leadership competencies: The role of human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(3), 352–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308316450
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zammuto, R. F., & Cameron, K. S. (1985). Environmental decline and organizational response. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 223–262.
   Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2009.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families. Family Business Review, 25(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511423531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2010). Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO Origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zona, F. (2016). CEO leadership and board decision processes in family-controlled firms: Comparing family and non-family CEOs. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9764-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zybura, N., Müller, B., & Gottschalk, S. (2021a). Innovation activities after CEO succession in family firms: A longitudinal perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 12(2), 14817.
   Google Scholar
• Zybura, J., Zybura, N., Ahrens, J.‑P., & Woywode, M. (2021b). Innovation in the post-succession phase of family firms: Family CEO successors and leadership constellations as resources. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(2), 100336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar