Riding the Wave: How and When Public Issue Salience Impacts Corporate Social Responsibility Advertising

References

• Abou-Chadi, Tarik. 2016. “Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts–How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact.” British Journal of Political Science 46 (2):417–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, Rajeev, Venkatram Ramaswamy, Dana L. Alden, Jan‐Benedict E. M. Steenkamp, and Shivaramaiah Ramachander. 2000. “Effects of Brand Local and Nonlocal Origin on Consumer Attitudes in Developing Countries.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 9 (2):83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2010. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Éric, and Bonnie M. Meguid. 2008. “Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-Based Vote Choice.” Electoral Studies 27 (3):477–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagwat, Yashoda, Nooshin L. Warren, Joshua T. Beck, and George F. Watson, IV. 2020. “Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value.” Journal of Marketing 84 (5):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonardi, Jean-Philippe, and Gerald D. Keim. 2005. “Corporate Political Strategies for Widely Salient Issues.” Academy of Management Review 30 (3):555–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, Michael D., Sanaz Talaifar, and Samuel D. Gosling. 2018. “An Evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13 (2):149–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Lisa D., Cheryl Koopman, and Philip G. Zimbardo. 1995. “The Psychological Impact of Viewing the Film ‘JFK’: Emotions, Beliefs, and Political Behavioral Intentions.” Political Psychology 16 (2):237–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Margaret C., and Kevin Lane Keller. 2003. “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2):292–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuk, David J., and Berwood A. Yost. 2016. “The Effects of Issue Salience, Elite Influence, and Policy Content on Public Opinion.” Political Communication 33 (2):328–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conick, Hal. 2018. “Consumers Want Brands to Take a Stand on Social Issues.” October 2. https://medium.com/@AMA_Marketing/consumers-want-brands-to-take-a-stand-on-social-issues-46d8faea8c2.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., and Sara B. Hobolt. 2012. “When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs.” European Union Politics 13 (2):246–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser‐Jedenastik, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Anna Katharina Winkler. 2014. “How Parties Compete for Votes: A Test of Saliency Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (1):57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau, Stacy Landreth, and Judith Anne Garretson Folse. 2007. “Cause-Related Marketing (CRM): The Influence of Donation Proximity and Message-Framing Cues on the Less-Involved Consumer.” Journal of Advertising 36 (4):19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, Aisha. 2019. “The Exec Behind *That* Gillette Ad Says Brands Have a Responsibility to Challenge Toxic Masculinity.” May 24. https://qz.com/quartzy/1626698/pg-exec-behind-viral-gillette-ad-talks-toxic-masculinity/.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, David, Gabriele Paolacci, and Jesse J. Chandler. 2019. “Common Concerns with MTurk as a Participant Pool: Evidence and Solutions.” In Handbook in Research Methods in Consumer Psychology, edited by Frank R. Kardes, Paul M. Herr, and Norbert Schwarz, 319–37. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F. 2017. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Danny. 2008. “Does the Messenger Matter? Candidate-Media Agenda Convergence and Its Effects on Voter Issue Salience.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1):134–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Hongwei, Yan Li, and Lloyd Harris. 2012. “Social Identity Perspective on Brand Loyalty.” Journal of Business Research 65 (5):648–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Noah, David K. Park, and Travis N. Ridout. 2006. “Dialogue in American Political Campaigns? An Examination of Issue Convergence in Candidate Television Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):724–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Eunjin, S. Ratneshwar, and Esther Thorson. 2017. “Why Narrative Ads Work: An Integrated Process Explanation.” Journal of Advertising 46 (2):283–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Iñaki Sagarzazu. 2016. “Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention.” West European Politics 39 (2):380–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, Barbara A., and Diane R. Edmondson. 2009. “Portraying the Cause instead of the Brand in Cause-Related Marketing Ads: Does It Really Matter?” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 17 (2):129–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, Sophie, Claes de Vreese, and Rune Slothuus. 2009. “Issue Importance as a Moderator of Framing Effects.” Communication Research 36 (3):400–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Joanne M., Jon A. Krosnick, and Leandre R. Fabrigar. 2017. “The Origins of Policy Issue Salience: Personal and National Importance Impact on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Emotional Issue Engagement.” In Political Psychology: New Explorations, edited by Jon A. Krosnick, I-Chant A. Chiang, and Tobias H. Stark, 125–70. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, Christine. 2020. “Commentary: Brand Activism in a Political World.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 39 (4):388–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehling, Darrel D., David E. Sprott, and Abdullah J. Sultan. 2014. “Exploring the Boundaries of Nostalgic Advertising Effects: A Consideration of Childhood Brand Exposure and Attachment on Consumers’ Responses to Nostalgia-Themed Advertisements.” Journal of Advertising 43 (1):73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, Sourjo, and Niek Althuizen. 2020. “Brand Activism: Does Courting Controversy Help or Hurt a Brand?” International Journal of Research in Marketing 37 (4):772–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rade, Candalyn B., Sarah L. Desmarais, and Roger E. Mitchell. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis of Public Attitudes toward Ex-Offenders.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 43 (9):1260–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, Lydia. 2020. “Gallup Election 2020 Coverage.” October 29. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/321650/gallup-election-2020-coverage.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Sibai, Olivier, Laetitia Mimoun, and Achilleas Boukis. 2021. “Authenticating Brand Activism: Negotiating the Boundaries of Free Speech to Make a Change.” Psychology & Marketing 38 (10):1651–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiller, Stephen A., Gavan J. Fitzsimons, John G. Lynch, Jr., and Gary H. McClelland. 2013. “Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression.” Journal of Marketing Research 50 (2):277–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae‐Jae, Sara B. Hobolt, and Catherine E. De Vries. 2014. “Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (2):363–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57 (2):368–77. ”
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangari, Andrea Heintz, Judith Anne Garretson Folse, Scot Burton, and Jeremy Kees. 2010. “The Moderating Influence of Consumers’ Temporal Orientation on the Framing of Societal Needs and Corporate Responses in Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns.” Journal of Advertising 39 (2):35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, and Peter Van Aelst. 2006. “The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory.” Journal of Communication 56 (1):88–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Jack L. 1977. “Setting the Agenda in the US Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7 (4):423–45.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, David. 1991. “Issue Salience and Public Opinion: Are There Consequences of Agenda-Setting?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 3 (1):53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6 (4):371–98.
   Google Scholar