Beneficial or Harmful? How (Mis)Fit of Targeted Political Advertising on Social Media Shapes Voter Perceptions

References

• Aaker, J. L. 1999. “The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion.” Journal of Marketing Research 36 (1):45–57. doi:10.1177/002224379903600104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auxier, B., L. Rainie, M. Anderson, A. Perrin, M. Kumar, and E. Turner. 2019, November 15. “Americans and Privacy: Concerned, Confused, and Feeling Lack of Control over Their Personal Information." https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/11/15/americans-and-privacy-concerned-confused-and-feeling-lack-of-control-over-their-personal-information/.
   Google Scholar
• Barocas, S. 2012. “The Price of Precision: Voter Microtargeting and Its Potential Harms to the Democratic Process.” Proceedings of the First Edition Workshop on Politics, Elections and Data – PLEAD 12:31–6. doi:10.1145/2389661.2389671.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. 2006. “Three Virtues of Panel Data for the Analysis of Campaign Effects.” In Capturing Campaign Effects, edited by H. E. Brady and R. G. C. Johnston, 134–63. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, K., S. Meissner, and H. Krasnova. 2021. “Partisan Self-Interest Is an Important Driver for People’s Support for the Regulation of Targeted Political Advertising.” PLoS One 16 (5):e0250506. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beam, M. A. 2014. “Automating the News: How Personalized News Recommender System Design Choices Impact News Reception.” Communication Research 41 (8):1019–41. doi:10.1177/0093650213497979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, É., and B. M. Meguid. 2008. “Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-Based Vote Choice.” Electoral Studies 27 (3):477–91. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. 2016. “Voter Databases, Micro-Targeting, and Data Protection Law: Can Political Parties Campaign in Europe as They Do in North America?” International Data Privacy Law 6 (4):261–75. doi:10.1093/idpl/ipw021.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, A., M. Stubenvoll, M. Hirsch, and J. Matthes. 2022. “Why Am I Getting This Ad? How the Degree of Targeting Disclosures and Political Fit Affect Persuasion Knowledge, Party Evaluation, and Online Privacy Behaviors.” Journal of Advertising 51 (2):206–22. doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.2015727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleier, A., and M. Eisenbeiss. 2015. “Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where.” Marketing Science 34 (5):669–88. doi:10.1287/mksc.2015.0930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., and S. Kruikemeier. 2016. “Consumer Responses to Promoted Tweets Sent by Brands and Political Parties.” Computers in Human Behavior 65:285–94. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., S. Kruikemeier, and F. J. Zuiderveen Borgesius. 2017. “Online Behavioral Advertising: A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Advertising 46 (3):363–76. doi:10.1080/00913367.2017.1339368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., E. A. van Reijmersdal, E. Rozendaal, and A. L. Dima. 2018. “Development of the Persuasion Knowledge Scales of Sponsored Content (PKS-SC).” International Journal of Advertising 37 (5):671–97. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1470485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, N., T. Dienlin, S. Kruikemeier, M. Sax, S. C. Boerman, J. Strycharz, N. Helberger, and C. H. de Vreese. 2018. “Understanding the Effects of Personalization as a Privacy Calculus: Analyzing Self-Disclosure across Health, News, and Commerce Contexts.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 23 (6):370–88. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmy020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchi, M., E. Fosch-Villaronga, C. Lutz, A. Tamò-Larrieux, and S. Velidi. 2021. “Making Sense of Algorithmic Profiling: User Perceptions on Facebook.” Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1989011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I., and D. J. Farlie. 1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in 23 Democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Burkholder, G. J., and L. L. Harlow. 2003. “An Illustration of a Longitudinal Cross-Lagged Design for Larger Structural Equation Models.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 10 (3):465–86. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. 2016. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315757421
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C. 1995. “When Attention-Getting Advertising Tactics Elicit Consumer Inferences of Manipulative Intent: The Importance of Balancing Benefits and Investments.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 4 (3):225–54. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0403_02.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. 1997. “Effects of Attention to Campaign Coverage on Political Trust.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 9 (3):286–96. doi:10.1093/ijpor/9.3.286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 2012, October 26. “Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02).” Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:C2012/326/02
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., R. G. Niemi, and G. E. Silver. 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12 (3):289–314. doi:10.1007/BF00992337.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. 1983. “The Third-Person Effect in Communication.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 47 (1):1–15. doi:10.1086/268763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, D. V., A. Shehata, J. Strömbäck, and L. W. Nord. 2014. “The Effects of Digital Media on Political Knowledge and Participation in Election Campaigns: Evidence from Panel Data.” Communication Research 41 (1):95–118. doi:10.1177/0093650211426004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, T., D. Trilling, N. Helberger, and C. de Vreese. 2019. “Spiraling Downward: The Reciprocal Relation between Attitude toward Political Behavioral Targeting and Privacy Concerns.” New Media & Society 21 (6):1212–31. doi:10.1177/1461444818813372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, T., D. Trilling, N. Helberger, and C. H. de Vreese. 2017. “Two Crates of Beer and 40 Pizzas: The Adoption of Innovative Political Behavioural Targeting Techniques.” Internet Policy Review 6 (4):1–25. doi:10.14763/2017.4.777.
   Google Scholar
• Dommett, K. 2019. “Data-Driven Political Campaigns in Practice: Understanding and Regulating Diverse Data-Driven Campaigns.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4):1–18. doi:10.14763/2019.4.1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, K. 2020. “Targeted Issue Messages and Voting Behavior.” American Politics Research 48 (2):317–28. doi:10.1177/1532673X19875694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. U. General Data Protection Regulation. 2016, April 27. “Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).” Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. 2022. “How Does Facebook Decide Which Ads to Show Me?" Help Center. https://www.facebook.com/help/562973647153813?helpref=related&source_cms_id=794535777607370&ref=related&cms_id=562973647153813.
   Google Scholar
• Felzmann, H., E. F. Villaronga, C. Lutz, and A. Tamò-Larrieux. 2019. “Transparency You Can Trust: Transparency Requirements for Artificial Intelligence between Legal Norms and Contextual Concerns.” Big Data & Society 6 (1):1–14. doi:10.1177/2053951719860542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, M. L., E. G. Smit, and P. W. J. Verlegh. 2015. “Strategies and Motives for Resistance to Persuasion: An Integrative Framework.” Frontiers in Psychology 6:1201–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1):1–31. doi:10.1086/209380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaus, M., U. Wagner, and R. C. Rainer. 2021. “Emotional Targeting Using Digital Signage Systems and Facial Recognition at the Point-of-Sale.” Journal of Business Research 131:747–62. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germelmann, C. C., J.-L. Herrmann, M. Kacha, and P. R. Darke. 2020. “Congruence and Incongruence in Thematic Advertisement–Medium Combinations: Role of Awareness, Fluency, and Persuasion Knowledge.” Journal of Advertising 49 (2):141–64. doi:10.1080/00913367.2020.1745110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., B. Palmquist, and E. Schickler. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haenschen, K., and J. Jennings. 2019. “Mobilizing Millennial Voters with Targeted Internet Advertisements: A Field Experiment.” Political Communication 36 (3):357–75. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1548530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkias, G., and F. Kokkinaki. 2011. “How Schema Incongruity Influences Consumer Responses: Exploring the Degree of Incongruity for Different Sources of Discrepancy.” In E – European Advances in Consumer Research, edited by A. Bradshaw, C. Hackley, and P. Maclaran, 144–50. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Halkias, G., and F. Kokkinaki. 2013. “Increasing Advertising Effectiveness through Incongruity-Based Tactics: The Moderating Role of Consumer Involvement.” Journal of Marketing Communications 19 (3):182–97. doi:10.1080/13527266.2011.592346.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, C.-D., and M. R. Nelson. 2016. “The Role of Persuasion Knowledge, Assessment of Benefit and Harm, and Third-Person Perception in Coping with Online Behavioral Advertising.” Computers in Human Behavior 62:689–702. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. D., and B. F. Schaffner. 2013. “Targeted Campaign Appeals and the Value of Ambiguity.” The Journal of Politics 75 (2):520–34. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J., and S. Globetti. 2002. “Political Trust and Racial Policy Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2):253. doi:10.2307/3088375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillygus, D. S., and T. G. Shields. 2009. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400831593
   Google Scholar
• Holman, M. R., M. C. Schneider, and K. Pondel. 2015. “Gender Targeting in Political Advertisements.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (4):816–29. doi:10.1177/1065912915605182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. W., and G. M. Zinkhan. 1995. “Self-Concept and Advertising Effectiveness: The Influence of Congruency, Conspicuousness, and Response Mode.” Psychology and Marketing 12 (1):53–77. doi:10.1002/mar.4220120105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoomans, J. 2015, March 20. “35,000 Decisions: The Great Choices of Strategic Leaders.” The Leading Edge. https://go.roberts.edu/leadingedge/the-great-choices-of-strategic-leaders.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-L., and J. C.-C. Lin. 2018. “Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption of Internet of Things Services.” Journal of Computer Information Systems 58 (1):49–57. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1186524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., and A. Bankert. 2017. “Political Partisanship as a Social Identity.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, edited by W. R. Thompson, 1–24. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.250
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. 2013. “Messages, Micro-Targeting, and New Media Technologies.” The Forum 11 (3):429–35. doi:10.1515/for-2013-0052.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., and J. Meng. 2011. “Reinforcement of the Political Self through Selective Exposure to Political Messages.” Journal of Communication 61 (2):349–68. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, P. D. 2020. “Why Digital-Era Political Marketing Is Not the Death Knell for Democracy: On the Importance of Placing Political Microtargeting in the Context of Party Competition.” Statistics, Politics and Policy 11 (1):87–110. doi:10.1515/spp-2019-0006.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. 2017. “Micro-Targeting, the Quantified Persuasion.” Internet Policy Review 6 (4):1–14. doi:10.14763/2017.4.774.
   Google Scholar
• Krotzek, L. J. 2019. “Inside the Voter’s Mind: The Effect of Psychometric Microtargeting on Feelings toward and Propensity to Vote for a Candidate.” International Journal of Communication 13:3609–29. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., M. Sezgin, and S. C. Boerman. 2016. “Political Microtargeting: Relationship between Personalized Advertising on Facebook and Voters’ Responses.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 19 (6):367–72. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. S., S. S. Lee, F. Liang, D. H. Kim, L. Shen, B. E. Weeks, and N. Kwak. 2019. “Social Media Expression and the Political Self.” Journal of Communication 69 (1):49–72. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, R. S., and M. Wolfe. 1977. “Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Developmental Theory.” Journal of Social Issues 33 (3):22–42. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01880.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne, M. 2021. “Strengthening Ties: The Influence of Microtargeting on Partisan Attitudes and the Vote.” Party Politics 27 (5):965–76. doi:10.1177/1354068820918387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevere, J., A. Tresch, and S. Walgrave. 2015. “Introduction: Issue Ownership.” West European Politics 38 (4):755–60. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1039375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. 2019. “Too Fast, Too Straight, Too Weird: Non-Reactive Indicators for Meaningless Data in Internet Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 13 (3):229–48. doi:10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. 2016. “When Does Web-Based Personalization Really Work? The Distinction between Actual Personalization and Perceived Personalization.” Computers in Human Behavior 54:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, A., and P. Harris. 1996. “Political Marketing – vive la différence!.” European Journal of Marketing 30 (10/11):14–24. doi:10.1108/03090569610149764.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, J., H. Cheng, and D. Riffe. 2010. “Voters’ Attention, Perceived Effects, and Voting Preferences: Negative Political Advertising in the 2006 Ohio Governor’s Election.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (5):487–511. doi:10.1080/15205430903457430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D., and S. Chaiken. 1991. “Promoting Systematic Processing in Low-Motivation Settings: Effect of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (1):13–25. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. 1982. “The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste.” In Affect and Cognition : 17th Annual Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition, edited by M. S. Clark and S. T. Fiske, 3–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mani, Z., and I. Chouk. 2017. “Drivers of Consumers’ Resistance to Smart Products.” Journal of Marketing Management 33 (1–2):76–97. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2016.1245212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., M. Hirsch, M. Stubenvoll, A. Binder, S. Kruikemeier, S. Lecheler, and L. Otto. 2022. “Understanding the Democratic Role of Perceived Online Political Micro-Targeting: Longitudinal Effects on Trust in Democracy and Political Interest.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 19 (4):435–48. doi:10.1080/19331681.2021.2016542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., and F. Marquart. 2015. “A New Look at Campaign Advertising and Political Engagement: Exploring the Effects of Opinion-Congruent and -Incongruent Political Advertisements.” Communication Research 42 (1):134–55. doi:10.1177/0093650213514600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. M., and M. Wagner. 2016. “Issue Engagement in Election Campaigns the Impact of Electoral Incentives and Organizational Constraints.” Political Science Research and Methods 4 (3):555–71. doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanz, A., and J. Matthes. 2022. “Seeing Political Information Online Incidentally. Effects of First- and Second-Level Incidental Exposure on Democratic Outcomes.” Computers in Human Behavior 133:107285. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. R., C. D. Ham, E. Haley, and U. C. Chung. 2021. “How Political Interest and Gender Influence Persuasion Knowledge, Political Information Seeking, and Support for Regulation of Political Advertising in Social Media.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 21 (3):225–42. doi:10.1080/15252019.2021.1978352.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, L. P., F. Thomas, I. Glogger, and C. H. De Vreese. 2021. “Linking Media Content and Survey Data in a Dynamic and Digital Media Environment – Mobile Longitudinal Linkage Analysis.” Digital Journalism 10 (1):200–15. doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1890169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakyriakopoulos, O., S. Hegelich, M. Shahrezaye, and J. C. M. Serrano. 2018. “Social Media and Microtargeting: Political Data Processing and the Consequences for Germany.” Big Data & Society 5 (2):1–15. doi:10.1177/2053951718811844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3):825–50. doi:10.2307/2111797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilditch, T., and J. K. Madsen. 2021. “Targeting Your Preferences: Modelling Micro-Targeting for an Increasingly Diverse Electorate.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 24 (1):1–16. doi:10.18564/jasss.4452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, F., and J. Matthes. 2021. ““The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”: A Panel Study on the Reciprocal Effects of Negative, Dirty, and Positive Campaigning on Political Distrust.” Mass Communication and Society 25 (5):649–72. doi:10.1080/15205436.2021.1934702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemmele, A., and R. Gibson. 2020. “Scientific and Subversive: The Two Faces of the Fourth Era of Political Campaigning.” New Media & Society 22 (4):595–610. doi:10.1177/1461444819893979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48:1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J. 1985. “Using Self-Congruity and Ideal Congruity to Predict Purchase Motivation.” Journal of Business Research 13 (3):195–206. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(85)90026-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J. 2018. “Self-Congruity Theory in Consumer Behavior: A Little History.” Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 28 (2):197–207. doi:10.1080/21639159.2018.1436981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, E. G., G. Van Noort, and H. A. M. Voorveld. 2014. “Understanding Online Behavioural Advertising: User Knowledge, Privacy Concerns and Online Coping Behaviour in Europe.” Computers in Human Behavior 32:15–22. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubenvoll, M., A. Binder, S. Noetzel, M. Hirsch, and J. Matthes. 2022. “Living Is Easy with Eyes Closed: Avoidance of Targeted Political Advertising in Response to Privacy Concerns, Perceived Personalization, and Overload.” Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/00936502221130840.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by S. Worchel and L. W. Austin, 276–93. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Taris, T. 2000. A Primer in Longitudinal Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., K. Cotter, M. Medeiros, and C. Pak. 2019. “Algorithmic Inference, Political Interest, and Exposure to News and Politics on Facebook.” Information, Communication & Society 24 (2):183–200. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., L. Reinecke, N. B. Ellison, O. Quiring, M. Z. Yao, and M. Ziegele. 2017. “A Cross-Cultural Perspective on the Privacy Calculus.” Social Media + Society 3 (1):1–13. doi:10.1177/2056305116688035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, E., K. Poels, and M. Walrave. 2020. “How Do Users Evaluate Personalized Facebook Advertising? An Analysis of Consumer- and Advertiser Controlled Factors.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 23 (2):309–27. doi:10.1108/QMR-10-2018-0125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn, J., and J. C. Hoekstra. 2013. “Customization of Online Advertising: The Role of Intrusiveness.” Marketing Letters 24 (4):339–51. doi:10.1007/s11002-012-9222-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., A. Tresch, and J. Lefevere. 2015. “The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Issue Ownership.” West European Politics 38 (4):778–96. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1039381.
   Google Scholar
• West, E. A., and S. Iyengar. 2020. “Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization.” Political Behavior 44:807–38. doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09637-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., T. Dobber, G. De Pauw, and C. de Vreese. 2020. “Using a Personality-Profiling Algorithm to Investigate Political Microtargeting: Assessing the Persuasion Effects of Personality-Tailored Ads on Social Media.” Communication Research 49 (8):1066–91. doi:10.1177/0093650220961965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., K. Poels, M. Walrave, and K. Ponnet. 2019. “The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Adolescents’ Evaluation of Targeted Advertising on Social Networking Sites.” International Journal of Advertising 38 (2):316–35. doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1419416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. 2015. “Improving Privacy Protection in the Area of Behavioural Targeting.” SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2654213 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.2654213.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., J. Möller, S. Kruikemeier, R. Ó Fathaigh, K. Irion, T. Dobber, B. Bodo, and C. De Vreese. 2018. “Online Political Microtargeting: Promises and Threats for Democracy.” Utrecht Law Review 14 (1):82–96. doi:10.18352/ulr.420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar