Tensions between inclusion and change in worldview education: can Joe F. Kincheloe’s bricolage help teachers navigate them?

References

• Andreassen, B.-O. 2016. Religionsdidaktikk. En innføring. 2. utgave. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, Ø. S., and C. S. Jørgensen. 2022. “Et ressursperspektiv på uenighet: Analyse av kjerneelementet Utforsking av religioner og livssyn med ulike metoder.” Prismet 73 (1–2): 23–49. doi:10.5617/pri.9696.
   Google Scholar
• Aukland, K. 2021. “Å lære hvordan. Forslag til et nytt mål utover å lære om og av religion.” Nordidactica - Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education 21 (1): 103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2020. Educational Research. An Unorthodox Introduction. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, O. M. H. 2021. “Non-Binary Worldviews in Education.” British Journal of Religious Education 44 (3): 325–335. doi:10.1080/01416200.2021.1901653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, Ø. 2018. “Religionskritikk i klasserommet. Fag, kritikk og ontologi i norsk skule.” Prismet 18 (2): 107–131. doi:10.5617/pri.6260.
   Google Scholar
• Brekke, Ø. 2023. Religionshermeneutikk. Forståing i ei polarisert tid. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. 1992. “Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings.” Journal of Learning Sciences 2 (2): 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2.
   Google Scholar
• CORE (Commission on Religious Education). 2018. “Final Report. Religion and Worldviews: The Way Forward. A National Plan for RE.” London: Religious Education Council of England and Wales. 7. Accessed 23 September 2022. https://www.commission-onre.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Final-Report-of-the-Commission-on-RE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1999. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Doney, J. 2021. Unearthing Policies of Instrumentalization in English Religious Education Using Statement Archaeology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erricker, C., and J. Erricker. 2000. Reconstructing Religious, Spiritual and Moral Education. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fischetti, J. C., and B. T. Dlamini. 2013. Joe L. Kincheloe. With Liberty and Justice for All. In A Critical Pedagogy of Resistance, edited by J. D. Kirylo. Rotterdam: Brill
   Google Scholar
• Flensner, K. K., and M. von der Lippe. 2019. “Being Safe from What and Safe for Whom? A Critical Discussion of the Conceptual Metaphor of ‘Safe space’.” Intercultural Education 30 (3): 275–288. doi:10.1080/14675986.2019.1540102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies In Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, R., J. Doney, G. Freathy, K. Walshe, and G. Teece. 2017. “Pedagogical Bricoleurs and Bricolage Researchers: The Case of Religious Education.” British Journal of Educational Studies 65 (4): 425–443. doi:10.1080/00071005.2017.1343454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freathy, G., and R. Freathy. 2013. “The RE-Searchers: A Dialogic Approach to RE in Primary Schools.” Resource 36 (1): 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, G., R. Freathy, J. Doney, K. Walshe, and G. Teece. 2015. The RE-Searchers: A New Approach to Primary Religious Education. Exeter: Exeter, University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, M. 2008. “What Should We Teach as Controversial? A Defense for the Epistemic Criterion.” Educational Theory 58 (2): 213–228. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00285.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, O. H. B., and A. Toft. 2022. “Mediatised Human Rights Education: The (Challenging) Role of the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation.” Human Rights Education Review 5 (1): 28–46. doi:10.7577/hrer.4451.
   Google Scholar
• Hilt, L. T., and S. Bøyum. 2015. “Kulturelt mangfold og intern eksklusjon.” Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift 99 (3.4): 181–193. doi:10.18261/ISSN1504-2987-2015-03-04-03.
   Google Scholar
• Høstmælingen, N. 2005. “For sterk trospåvirkning: norsk kristendomsundervisning i strid med menneskerettighetene.” Norsk teologisk tidsskrift 106 (4): s. 232–248. doi:10.18261/ISSN1504-2979-2005-04-03.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, D., and T. Huddelstone. 2015. Living with Controversy. Teaching Controversial Issues Through Education for Democratic Citizenship and And Human Rights (EDC/HRE). Collected from https://edoc.coe.int/en/human-rights-democratic-citizenship-and-interculturalism/7738-teaching-controversial-issues.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2001. “Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 7 (6): 679–692. doi:10.1177/107780040100700601.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2005a. Introduction. In Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare Teach, edited by P. Freire. Boulder: Westview Press
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2005b. “On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bricolage.” Qualitative Inquiry 11 (3): 323–350. doi:10.1177/1077800405275056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2011a. Critical Pedagogy and the Knowledge Wars of the Twenty-First Century. In Key Works in Critical Pedagogy, edited by K. Hayes, S. R. Steinberg, and K. Tobin. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2011b. Selling a New and Improved Jesus – Christotainment and the Power of the Political. In Key Works in Critical Pedagogy, edited by K. Hayes, S. R. Steinberg, and K. Tobin. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2011c. Willie Morris and the Southern Curriculum. In Key Works in Critical Pedagogy, edited by K. Hayes, S. R. Steinberg, and K. Tobin. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Lied, S. 2008. “The Norwegian Christianity, Religion and Philosophy Subject KRL in Strasbourg.” British Journal of Religious Education 31 (3): 263–275. doi:10.1080/01416200903112474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippe, M. V. D. 2017. “Fritak for hvem og for hva?“ In Religion i skolen. Didaktiske perspektiver på religions- og livssynsbegrepet, edited byMarie von der Lippe, and Sissel Undheim, 14. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Moulin, D. 2009. “A Too Liberal Religious Education? A Thought Experiment for Teachers and Theorists.” British Journal of Religious Education 31 (2): 153–165. doi:10.1080/01416200802661126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate of Education and Training. 2021. “Læreplan i kristendom, religion, livssyn og etikk (KRLE) (RLE01-03).” https://www.udir.no/lk20/rle01-03
   Google Scholar
• OFSTED. 2013. Religious Education: Realising the Potential. Manchester: Office for Standards in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2021. Research Review Series: Religious Education. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-review-series-religious-education.
   Google Scholar
• Pett, S., Ed. 2021-2022. Challenging Knowledge in RE: Vol 1-6. Birmingham: RE Today Services.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, D. C., and N. C. Burbules. 2000. Post-Positivism and Educational Research. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rambøl, A. H., and M. von Krogh. 2021. “Kjønnsvurderinger.” Klassekampen. https://klassekampen.no/artikkel/2021-12-11/kjønnsvurderinger
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. 2012. “Contextualizing Theories and Practices of Bricolage Research.” The Qualitative Report 17: 1–17. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1704.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 2016. Religious Education and Critical Realism. Knowledge, Reality and Religious Literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar