Using framework analysis methods for qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 164

References

• Averill JB. 2002. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 12(6):855–866. doi: 10.1177/104973230201200611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer DF, Varpio L, Bennett D, Teunissen PW. 2021. Longitudinal qualitative research in medical education: time to conceptualise time. Med Educ. 55(11):1253–1260. doi:10.1111/medu.14542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard H, Ryan G. 2010. Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd. http://studysites.uk.sagepub.com/braunandclarke/study/additional.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2021. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Burton N, Galvin P. 2019. Using template and matrix analysis: a case study of management and organisation history research. Qual Res Organ Manage . 14(4):393–409. doi: 10.1108/QROM-04-2018-1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bynum WE, Teunissen P, Varpio L. 2021. In the ‘shadow of shame’: a phenomenological exploration of the nature of shame experiences in medical students. Acad Med. 96(11S):S23–S30. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K. 2011. A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 11(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., Booth, A., Leaviss, J., Rick J. (2013). “Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 13(1):37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. 2000. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; p. 509–535.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson E, Edwards R, Jamieson L, Weller S. 2019. Big data, qualitative style: a breadth-and-depth method for working with large amounts of secondary qualitative data. Qual Quant. 53(1):363–376. doi:10.1007/s11135-018-0757-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M. 2011. Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BMC Med. 9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-39/METRICS.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper CE, Mabena G, Motlhatlhedi M, Thwala N, Lawrence W, Weller S, Klingberg S, Ware LJ, Lye SJ, Norris SA. 2022. Implementation of Healthy Conversation Skills to support behaviour change in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a process evaluation. SSM Mental Health. 2:100132. doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100132.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay L. 2021. Thematic analysis: the ‘good’, the ‘bad’ and the ‘ugly’. Eur J Qual Res Psychother. 11:103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. 2013. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 13(1):117. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath G, Cameron E, Cummins C, Greenfield S, Pattison H, Kelly D, Redwood S. 2012. Paediatric ‘care closer to home’: stake-holder views and barriers to implementation. Health Place. 18(5):1068–1073. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmich E, Diachun L, Joseph R, LaDonna K, Noeverman-Poel N, Lingard L, Cristancho S. 2018. ‘Oh my God, I can’t handle this!’: trainees’ emotional responses to complex situations. Med Educ. 52(2):206–215. doi:10.1111/medu.13472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howman M, Walters K, Rosenthal J, Ajjawi R, Buszewicz M. 2016. ‘You kind of want to fix it don’t you?’ Exploring general practice trainees’ experiences of managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms. BMC Med Educ. 16(1):27. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0523-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins L, Mash B, Derese A. 2013. The national portfolio of learning for postgraduate family medicine training in South Africa: experiences of registrars and supervisors in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 13(1):149. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-149/TABLES/1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King N, Brooks J. 2018. Thematic analysis in organizational research. In: Cassell C, Cunliffe AL, Grandy G, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: volume 2: methods and challenges. Vol. 2. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Klingberg S, Motlhatlhedi M, Mabena G, Mooki T, Verdezoto N, Densmore M, Norris SA, CoMaCH Network. 2022. "Must you make an app?” A qualitative exploration of socio-technical challenges and opportunities for designing digital maternal and child health solutions in Soweto, South Africa. PLoS Glob Public Health. 2(12):e0001280. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klingberg S, van Sluijs EMF, Jong ST, Draper CE. 2021. Can public sector community health workers deliver a nurturing care intervention in South Africa? The Amagugu Asakhula feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 7(1):60. doi:10.1186/s40814-021-00802-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar K, Roberts C, Thistlethwaite J. 2011. Entering and navigating academic medicine: academic clinician-educators’ experiences. Med Educ. 45(5):497–503. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03887.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyura B, Ng SL, Baker LR, Lieff S, Millar BA, Mori B. 2017. A mandala of faculty development: using theory-based evaluation to explore contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 22(1):165–186. doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9690-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo C, King O, Brock T, Brown T, Crampton P, Hall H, Macaulay J, Morphet J, Mundy M, Oliaro L, et al. 2019. Setting priorities for health education research: a mixed methods study. Med Teach. 41(9):1029–1038., doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1612520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. 2000. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 320(7227):114–116. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman M, Pearce J, Gajebasia S, Johnson M, Finn G. 2017. Care of the dying: a qualitative exploration of foundation year doctors’ experiences. Med Educ. 51(10):1025–1036. doi:10.1111/medu.13358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. New York: Routledge; p. 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Barroso J. 2003. Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res. 13(7):905–923. doi: 10.1177/1049732303253488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier M. 2012. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens GC, Rees CE, Lazarus MD. 2021. Exploring the impact of education on preclinical medical students’ tolerance of uncertainty: a qualitative longitudinal study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 26(1):53–77. doi: 10.1007/S10459-020-09971-0/METRICS.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Thomson S. 2009. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. J Adm Governance. 4(2):72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Varpio L, MacLeod A. 2020. Philosophy of Science Series: harnessing the multidisciplinary edge effect by exploring paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, axiologies, and methodologies. Acad Med. 95(5):686–689. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar