Taking authorial liberties: Thomas Hobbes on the occasion of Leviathan

Bibliography

• Almond, Philip. Heaven and Hell in Enlightenment England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, Norberto. Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. Translated by Daniela Gobetti. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Borot, Luc. “History in Hobbes’s Thought.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, edited by T. Sorrell, 305–328. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Glenn. “Contexts for the Writing and Publication of Hobbes’s Leviathan.” History of Political Thought 11 (1990): 675–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, Norman T. Christian Mortalism from Tyndale to Milton. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Edited by Tom Sorrell, CambridgeCambridge UP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cantalupo, Charles, ed. A Literary Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes’s Masterpiece of Language. Bucknell: Bucknell UP, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Champion, J. A. I. “An Historical Narration Concerning Heresie: Thomas Hobbes, Thomas Barlow, and the Restoration Debate Over ‘Heresy’.” In Heresy, Literature and Politics in Early Modern English Culture, edited by D. Loewenstein and J. Marshall. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, Vere, ed. Hobbes and Bramhall on Liberty and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, William Dean. “Milton, Thomas Hobbes, and the Political Problem of Chaos.” SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 60, no. 1 (2020): 133–51. doi:10.1353/sel.2020.0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Jeffrey R. The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Jeffrey R. “Interpreting Thomas Hobbes in Competing Contexts.” Journal of the History of Ideas 70, no. 1 (2009): 165–80. doi:10.1353/jhi.0.0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condren, Conal. “On the Rhetorical Foundations of Leviathan.” History of Political Thought 11 (1990): 703–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromartie, Alan. “Hobbes, History, and Non-Denomination.” Hobbes Studies 22, no. 2 (2009): 171–77. doi:10.1163/092158909X12452520755513.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, Edwin. “I Durst Not Write so Boldly: How to Read Hobbes’ Theological-Political Treatise.” In Hobbes e Spinoza scienza e politca: atti del Convegno Internazionale, edited by Daniela, Bostrenghi, 497–593. Naples: University of Naples, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. C. Utopia and the Ideal Society: A Study of English Utopian Writing, 1516-1700. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, Oliver Lawson, ed. Aubrey’s Brief Lives. London: Secker and Warburg, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, James. “‘Atomes of Scripture’: Hobbes and the Politics of Biblical Interpretation.” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, edited by M. G. Dietz, 172–96. Lawrence: University Press of Kansa, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Geach, Peter. “The Religion of Thomas Hobbes.” Religious Studies 17, no. 4 (1981): 549–58. doi:10.1017/S0034412500013305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, David, and David Wengrow. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. New York and London: Penguin/Random House, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Hardy. “Hobbes and Mathematics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, edited by T. Sorrell. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Christopher. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the Revolution. London: Penguin, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. The English Works of Thomas Hobbes. Edited by Sir William Molesworth. 11 vols. London, 1839–1845a.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Opera Philosophica Quae Latina Scripsit Omnia. Edited by Sir William Molesworth. 5 vols. London, 1839–1845b.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England. Edited by Joseph Cropsey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. The Correspondence of Thomas Hobbes. Edited by Noel Malcolm. 2 vols. Clarendon: Oxford UP, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes. Edited by Noel B. Reynolds and Arlene W. Saxenhouse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Behemoth, or the Long Parliament. Edited by Paul Seaward. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen. Translated by Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, Edward, and Earl of Clarendon. A Brief View and Survey of the Dangerous and Pernicious Errors to Church and State in Mr. Hobbes’s Book Entitled Leviathan. Oxford, England, 1676.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, David. The Rhetoric of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Cultural Transformation. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, David. “Hobbes’s Mortalism.” History of Political Thought 10 (1989): 647–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Warren. “Eschatology and Radicalism After the Restoration: The English Context.” In Prophecy and Eschatology in the Transatlantic World, 1550-1800, edited by A. Crome, 187–211. London: Springer, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Victoria. Rhetoric, Prudence, and Skepticism in the Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, Noel. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, Noel. “A Summary Biography of Hobbes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, edited by Tom Sorell. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Manuel, F. E., and F. P. Manuel. Utopian Thought in the Western World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Martinich, A. P. Hobbes: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Martinich, A. P. “Interpreting the Religion of Thomas Hobbes: An Exchange.” Journal of the History of Ideas 70, no. 1 (2009): 143–63. doi:10.1353/jhi.0.0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, Samuel. The Hunting of Leviathan: Seventeenth-Century Reactions to the Materialism and Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Eric. The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge MA: Harvard UP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Okada, Takuya. “Hobbes’s Eschatology and Scriptural Interpretation in Leviathan.” The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 73, no. 2 (2022): 308–25. doi:10.1017/S0022046921000683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacchi, Arrigo. “Hobbes and the Problem of God.” In Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, edited by G. A. J. Rogers and Alan Ryan, 171–187. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, Jon. “Baiting the Bear: The Anglican Attack on Hobbes in the Later 1660s.” History of Political Thought 34, no. 3 (2013): 421–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, Jon. Taming the Leviathan: The Reception of the Political and Religious Ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England: 1640-1700. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. “Time, History and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes.” In Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History, 148–201. New York: Atheneum, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Prokhovik, Raia. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Hobbes’ Leviathan. New York: Routledge, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Raylor, Timothy. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Alan. “Hobbes, Toleration, and the Inner Life.” In The Nature of Political Theory, edited by David Miller and Larry Siedentop, 197–218. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Joel. “Hobbes and the Two Kingdoms of God.” Polity 18, no. 1 (1986): 7–24. doi:10.2307/3234730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, Victoria. “Hobbes on Rhetoric.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, edited by Tom Sorell, 329–345. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy.” In The Interregnum: The Quest for Settlement 1646-1660, edited by G. E. Aylmer, 79–98. London: Macmillan, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Thomas Hobbes on the Proper Signification of Liberty the Prothero Lecture.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 40 (1990): 121–51. doi:10.2307/3679165
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Thomas Hobbes and the Renaissance Studia Humanitatis.” In Writing and Political Engagement in Seventeenth-Century England, edited by Derek Hirst and Richard Strier, 69–88. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville, J. P. Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Context. New York: Macmillan, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Springborg, Patricia. “Leviathan and the Problem of Ecclesiastical Authority.” Political Theory 3, no. 3 (1975): 289–303. doi:10.1177/009059177500300305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springborg, Patricia. “Leviathan, the Christian Commonwealth Incorporated.” Political Studies 24, no. 2 (1976): 171–83. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1976.tb00102.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springborg, Patricia. “Hobbes, Heresy, and the Historia Ecclesiastica.” Journal of the History of Ideas 55, no. 4 (1994): 553–71. doi:10.2307/2709922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springborg, Patricia. “Hobbes’s Biblical Beasts: Leviathan and Behemoth.” Political Theory 23, no. 2 (1995): 353–75. doi:10.1177/0090591795023002008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springborg, Patricia. “Hobbes on Religion” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, edited by Tom Sorell, 346–380. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, Tracy B. “How to Write Scripture: Words, Authority, and Politics in Thomas Hobbes.” Critical Inquiry 20, no. 1 (1993): 128–59. doi:10.1086/448703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Keith. Man and the Natural World: A History of the Modern Sensibility. New York: Pantheon, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Keith. “The Social Origins of Hobbes’s Political Thought.” In Hobbes Studies, edited by K. C. Brown, 185–236. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, Richard. Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, Richard. “The Christian Atheism of Thomas Hobbes.” In Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment, edited by Michael Hunter and David Wootton, 111–130. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, Richard. “The Civil Religion of Thomas Hobbes.” In Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, edited by Nicholas Phillipson and Quentin Skinner, 120–138. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993a.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government, 1572-1651. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993b.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, John. “John Davies of Kidwelly (1627?-1693), Translator from the French.” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 44, no. 2 (1950): 119–51. doi:10.1086/pbsa.44.2.24298751.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, John. Hobbius Heauton-timorumenos. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1662.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. The Revolution of the Saints. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, George. “1668 Appendix to Leviathan, Translated with an Introduction and Notes.” Interpretation 18 (1991): 323–413.
   Google Scholar